华西口腔医学杂志

• 专栏论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

植入位点不同对颧骨种植义齿种植体周骨应力分布影响的研究

储顺礼1 周延民1 岳贵平2   

  1. 1.吉林大学口腔医院口腔种植中心, 吉林长春130041;2.中国第一汽车集团公司技术中心, 吉林长春130011
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-25 修回日期:2010-02-25 出版日期:2010-02-20 发布日期:2010-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 周延民,Tel:13039206505
  • 作者简介:储顺礼(1979—),男,安徽人,博士
  • 基金资助:

    吉林省科技发展计划资助项目(200505149)

Research on the influence of different implant site on the implant-bone-interface stress distribution in zygomatic implant denture

CHU Shun-li1, ZHOU Yan-min1, YUE Gui-ping2   

  1. 1. Implant Center, Stomatology School of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China; 2. China Faw Group Corporation R&D Center, Changchun 130011, China
  • Received:2010-02-25 Revised:2010-02-25 Online:2010-02-20 Published:2010-02-20
  • Contact: ZHOU Yan-min,Tel:13039206505

摘要:

目的探讨植入位点不同时颧骨种植义齿种植体-骨界面的应力分布规律。方法计算机模拟建立上颌后牙区重度萎缩三维有限元模型,分别在第一前磨牙区、第二前磨牙区、第一磨牙区和第二磨牙区模拟颧骨种植义齿修复。进行垂直向、颊向30°和舌向30°加载100 N,统计分析植入位点不同时颧骨种植义齿种植体-骨界面的应力。结果1)第一前磨牙区颧骨种植体颊侧暴露较多,与临床不符。2)上颌后牙区拉应力峰值比较:选择第二磨牙区植入时最大,第二前磨牙区次之,第一磨牙区最小。上颌后牙区压应力峰值比较:选择第二磨牙区植入时最大,第一磨牙区次之,第二前磨牙区最小。颧骨区拉应力及压应力峰值比较:选择第二前磨牙区植入时最大,第一磨牙区次之,第二磨牙区最小。结论选择第一磨牙区颧骨种植义齿修复较好。

关键词: 颧骨, 种植体, 应力,

Abstract:

Objective To probe the implant-bone-interface stress distribution of zygomatic implant denture concerning different implant sites. Methods Three-dimensional finite element model for severe atrophy maxillary posteriortooth area was established biomechanically in this study by computer technique and zygomatic implant was simulated into the model in the first-maxillary-premolar region, the second-maxillary-premolar region, the first-maxillary-molar region and the second-maxillary-molar region respectively. Vertical loading, buccal(30°) loading and lingual(30°) loading were preformed, 100 N. Then these load cases were calculated and analyzed. Results 1)When the implant site was placed in the first-maxillary-premolar region, the buccal side of zygomatic implant exposed out of the bone and didn′t meet the clinical request. 2)As far as the tensile stress peak value in the maxillary posterior-tooth area was concerned, the highest value was recorded when the implant was placed in the second-maxillary-molar region, and then the medium value was recorded when the implant was placed in the second-maxillary-premolar region, and the smallest was recorded when the implant in the first-maxillary-molar region. As far as the compressive stress peak value in the maxillary posterior -tooth area was concerned, the highest value was recorded when the implant was placed in the second-maxillary-molar region, and then the medium was recorded when the implant was in the firstmaxillary- molar region, and the smallest value was presented when the implant was in the second-maxillary-premolar region. As far as the tensile and compressive stress peak values in the zygomatic area were concerned, the highest value was recorded when the implant was in the second-maxillary-premolar region, and then the medium value when the implant was in the first-maxillary-molar region, and the smallest when the implant was in the second-maxillarymolar region. Conclusion The first-maxillary-molar region is the best implant site of zygomatic implant denture.

Key words: zygoma, implant, stress, bone