华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 532-536.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.05.010

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙周内窥镜辅助龈下刮治对残留牙周袋疗效的随机对照临床研究

张杨珩(), 李厚轩, 闫福华, 谭葆春()   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院·南京市口腔医院牙周病科,南京 210008
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-28 修回日期:2020-06-29 出版日期:2020-10-01 发布日期:2020-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 谭葆春 E-mail:zhangyh207@163.com;tanbaochun2002@163.com
  • 作者简介:张杨珩,医师,博士,E-mail:zhangyh207@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK17139);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20190133);江苏省医学创新团队(CXTDB2017-014)

Clinical effects of scaling and root planing with an adjunctive periodontal endoscope for residual pockets: a randomized controlled clinical study

Zhang Yangheng(), Li Houxuan, Yan Fuhua, Tan Baochun()   

  1. 5 mm) in patients with periodontitis after initial periodontal therapy and has advantages in improving the long-term curative effect of this therapy.
    Dept. of Periodontology, Nanjing Sto?matological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2019-12-28 Revised:2020-06-29 Online:2020-10-01 Published:2020-10-14
  • Contact: Tan Baochun E-mail:zhangyh207@163.com;tanbaochun2002@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Program(YKK17139);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20190133);Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Team(CXTDB2017-014)

摘要: 目的 比较牙周内窥镜辅助龈下刮治和根面平整(SRP)与传统SRP对慢性牙周炎患者基础治疗后残留牙周袋的临床疗效。方法 将牙周基础治疗后口内每个区至少有1个位点探诊深度(PD)≥5 mm的患者纳入研究,随机分为内窥镜组和SRP组,分别对残留牙周袋位点进行内窥镜辅助SRP治疗和传统SRP治疗。在治疗前(基线)、治疗后3、6个月检查PD、探诊出血(BOP)和附着丧失(AL),采用SPSS 20.0统计学软件对数据进行统计分析。结果 与基线相比,治疗后3、6个月内窥镜组及SRP组PD≥5 mm位点百分比、PD、AL、BOP阳性位点百分比均降低(P<0.05)。治疗后6个月与3个月相比,内窥镜组PD≥5 mm位点百分比、PD、AL、BOP阳性位点百分比均降低(P<0.05),而SRP组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与SRP组相比,内窥镜组治疗后3及6个月PD≥5 mm位点百分比、PD均降低,治疗后6个月AL、BOP阳性位点百分比降低(P<0.05)。结论 牙周内窥镜辅助SRP对于基础治疗后的残留牙周袋(PD≥5 mm)的临床疗效优于传统SRP,尤其具有更好的远期预后。

关键词: 牙周内窥镜, 残留牙周袋, 龈下刮治和根面平整, 慢性牙周炎

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of scaling and root planing (SRP) with a periodontal endoscope in the treatment of residual pockets in patients with periodontitis after initial periodontal therapy. Methods Patients with residual pockets [probing depth (PD)≥5 mm] were included and randomly assigned to the endoscope group (SRP with a periodontal endoscope) or SRP group (SRP alone). The PD, attachment loss (AL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) of residual pockets were recorded before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0 software. Results Compared with the baseline values, the percentage of PD≥5 mm sites, PD, AL, and BOP (+)% in the endoscope group and SRP group at 3 and 6 months after treatment decreased (P<0.05). Compared with the values at 3 months after treatment, the percentage of PD≥5 mm sites, PD, AL, and BOP (+)% at 3 and 6 months after treatment decreased in the endoscope group (P<0.05), whereas no statistical difference in these values was observed in the SRP group (P>0.05). Compared with those in the SRP group, the percentage of PD≥5 mm sites and PD at 3 and 6 months after treatment and AL and BOP (+)% at 6 months after treatment in the endos?cope group decreased (P<0.05). Conclusion SRP with a periodontal endoscope shows a better effect in improving the PD, AL, and BOP of residual pockets (PD≥5 mm) in patients with periodontitis after initial periodontal therapy and has advan?tages in improving the long-term curative effect of this therapy.

Key words: periodontal endoscope, residual pockets, scaling and root planing, chronic periodontitis

中图分类号: