| 1 |
Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: a literature review[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2020, 64(2): 109-113.
|
| 2 |
Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. PartⅠ: time efficiency of complete-arch di-gital scans versus conventional impressions[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(1): 69-75.
|
| 3 |
Watanabe H, Fellows C, An H. Digital technologies for restorative dentistry[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2022, 66(4): 567-590.
|
| 4 |
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, et al. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(1): 35-41.
|
| 5 |
Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. PartⅡ: time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(2): 252-257.
|
| 6 |
Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part Ⅲ: marginal and internal fit[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(3): 426-431.
|
| 7 |
Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. PartⅡ: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 118(1): 43-48.
|
| 8 |
Vavrickova L, Kapitan M, Schmidt J. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of digital and conventional impression methods for fixed dentures[J]. Technol Heal-th Care, 2023, 32(2): 885-896.
|
| 9 |
Sturzenegger B, Fehér A, Lüthy H, et al. Clinical study of zirconium oxide bridges in the posterior segments fabricated with the DCM system[J]. Swiss Dent J, 2000, 110(12): 131-139.
|
| 10 |
Adams HF. Managing gingival tissues during definiti-ve restorative treatment[J]. Quintessence Int Dent Dig, 1981, 12(2): 141-149.
|
| 11 |
de Oliveira NRC, Pigozzo MN, Sesma N, et al. Clinical efficiency and patient preference of digital and conventional workflow for single implant crowns using imme-diate and regular digital impression: a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(8): 669-686.
|
| 12 |
Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, et al. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 127(1): 71-79.
|
| 13 |
Shalileh S, Abbasi K, Azhmand H, et al. Effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the impression accuracy of digital and conventional methods[J]. J Med Life, 2023, 16(5): 736-742.
|
| 14 |
Park JS, Lim YJ, Kim B, et al. Clinical evaluation of time efficiency and fit accuracy of lithium disilicate single crowns between conventional and digital impression[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(23): 5467.
|
| 15 |
Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(2): 121-128.
|
| 16 |
Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2013, 16(1): 11-21.
|
| 17 |
Radi IA, ElKhashab MA. Intraoral scanning and conventional impression may have similar time efficientcy for complete coverage crowns and three-unit tooth-suppor-ted prostheses[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2023, 23(3): 101894.
|
)
