华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

自酸蚀和磷酸酸蚀窝沟封闭术的临床比较

张笋 秦满 李静   

  1. 北京大学口腔医院儿童口腔科, 北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2008-12-25 修回日期:2008-12-25 出版日期:2008-12-20 发布日期:2008-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 秦满,Tel:010-62179977-2361
  • 作者简介:张笋(1966-),女,北京人,副教授,硕士

A comparison study on the effect of self-etching adhesive and phosphoric acid fissure sealant in children

ZHANG Sun, QIN Man, LI Jing   

  1. Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2008-12-25 Revised:2008-12-25 Online:2008-12-20 Published:2008-12-20
  • Contact: QIN Man,Tel:010-62179977-2361

摘要:

目的应用自酸蚀法和磷酸酸蚀法对低龄高危患龋儿童进行窝沟封闭术,以比较窝沟封闭剂的保留率和龋齿预防情况。方法选择不超过42月龄、患龋牙数不低于4颗的高危患龋儿童43例为研究对象;试验牙为第一乳磨牙患龋患儿的第二乳磨牙,窝沟较深或早期脱矿但没有缺损的第二乳磨牙及第一乳磨牙,共选择试验牙138颗。采用自身半口对照方法,随机选择一侧试验牙应用自酸蚀法,另一侧应用传统磷酸酸蚀法进行窝沟封闭术,分别设为试验组和对照组。定期复查封闭剂保留情况和患龋情况。结果3个月复查时2组窝沟封闭剂的完好保留率没有统计学差异,6、12和18个月复查时自酸蚀组窝沟封闭剂完好保留率低于磷酸酸蚀组,龋齿发生率高于磷酸酸蚀组(P<0.05)。龋坏主要发生在封闭剂脱落的窝沟内,2组均出现了邻面龋。结论自酸蚀法窝沟封闭术的完好保留率低于磷酸酸蚀法,临床上应慎重应用。如果在低龄易患龋齿的儿童中应用该方法,需密切观察。

关键词: 窝沟封闭术, 自酸蚀, 磷酸酸蚀, 封闭剂保留率, 龋齿

Abstract:

Objective To compare the retention and caries prevention of fissure sealant on the primary molars etched with self-etching adhesive and phosphoric acid in children. Methods 43 children younger than 42 months with more than 4 decayed teeth were studied. The split-mouth design was used in this study. The second and/or first primary molars were randomly assigned into self-etching adhesive group in one side of mouth, and phosphoric acid group in the other side. Sealants were applied on 69 pair primary molars according to manufacturer′ s instruction with dental cotton-roll isolation. The children were followed up every 3 months, and the sealants were observed and evaluated. In the case caries occurred, the teeth were restored. Results After 3 months, the retention rate was 93% in self-etching adhesive group and 100% in phosphoric acid group. At 6, 12 and 18 months, the retention rate of self-etching adhesive group was statistically lower than that of phosphoric acid group(P<0.05) by Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Caries occurred in both groups and self-etching adhesive group had more caries than phosphoric acid group. Though its retention rate was low, self-etching adhesive was suitable for young children because it was timesaving and its bonding procedures were simple without discomfort rinsing. Conclusion The retention rate of sealant with self-etching adhesive was lower than that with phosphoric acid. The phosphoric acid is suitable for pit and fissure sealant. If self-etching adhesive is  sed for sealing primary molars of young children for a limited period of time, it should be reviewed every 3 months.

Key words: fissure sealant, self-etching adhesive, phosphoric acid, retention rate, caries