经多巴胺或硅烷化修饰的氧化石墨烯钛表面涂层的体外成骨性能研究

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2025.2024357

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 336-345.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2025.2024357

经多巴胺或硅烷化修饰的氧化石墨烯钛表面涂层的体外成骨性能研究

吴清霖(), 赖颖真(), 黄艳玲, 谢泽宇, 林彦吟

厦门医学院口腔医学院口腔生物材料福建省高校工程研究中心，厦门 361023

收稿日期:2024-09-25 修回日期:2024-11-29 出版日期:2025-06-01 发布日期:2025-06-10
通讯作者: 赖颖真 E-mail:1976717712@qq.com;dentistyz@126.com
作者简介:吴清霖，学士，E-mail：1976717712@qq.com
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金(2022J011408);厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20244ZD1134);厦门医学院校级科研项目(K2023-01)

In vitro osteogenic performance study of graphene oxide-coated titanium surfaces modified with dopamine or silane

Wu Qinglin(), Lai Yingzhen(), Huang Yanling, Xie Zeyu, Lin Yanyin

School of Stomatology, Xiamen Medical College & Engineering Research Center of Stomatological Biomaterials, Fujian Province University, Xiamen 361023, China

Received:2024-09-25 Revised:2024-11-29 Online:2025-06-01 Published:2025-06-10
Contact: Lai Yingzhen E-mail:1976717712@qq.com;dentistyz@126.com
Supported by:
Fujian Natural Science Foundation Project(2022J011408);Xiamen City Medical and Health Guiding Project(3502Z20244ZD1134);Scientific Research Project of Xiamen Medical College(K2023-01)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的本研究通过比较经多巴胺或硅烷化修饰的氧化石墨烯钛表面涂层的成骨性能差异，旨在尝试为钛表面氧化石墨烯涂层的修饰提供较为适宜的方案。方法钛碱热处理后分别进行多巴胺和硅烷化改性，被覆氧化石墨烯涂层，设计对照组：纯钛（Ti）组；实验组：钛经碱热处理（Ti-NaOH）组、钛经碱热处理后硅烷化改性（Ti-APTES）组、钛经碱热处理后多巴胺改性（Ti-DOPA）组、钛经硅烷化改性表面修饰氧化石墨烯（Ti-APTES/GO）组、钛经多巴胺改性表面修饰氧化石墨烯（Ti-DOPA/GO）组。利用扫描电子显微镜、接触角测量仪、X射线光电子能谱分析仪及拉曼光谱分析仪对材料表面的理化性能进行分析。通过细胞活性检测、免疫荧光染色后激光共聚焦显微镜观察小鼠胚胎成骨细胞前体细胞MC3T3-E1在材料表面的增殖及黏附形态。通过碱性磷酸酶、茜素红染色及定量、实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应研究对MC3T3-E1细胞成骨分化的影响。结果氧化石墨烯涂层修饰后扫描电子显微镜观察可见覆盖一层薄膜样结构，实验组亲水性皆有改善，其中Ti-DOPA/GO组亲水性最佳。X射线光电子能谱学和拉曼光谱分析显示氧化石墨烯修饰后的材料均出现典型D峰和G峰，表面出现大量含氧官能团。细胞计数盒检测可见各组材料均无细胞毒性，Ti-APTES/GO组增殖水平高于Ti-DOPA/GO组。激光共聚焦显微镜下可见Ti-DOPA/GO组和Ti-APTES/GO组细胞铺展更为饱满。Ti-DOPA/GO组与Ti-APTES/GO组碱性磷酸酶染色最深，Ti-APTES/GO组茜素红染色矿化结节最多，茜素红染色定量结果最高；在Ti-DOPA/GO组和Ti-APTES/GO组中，早期成骨相关基因RUNX2的表达均达到较高水平，而在晚期成骨相关基因OPN和OCN的表达上，Ti-APTES/GO组的表现优于Ti-DOPA/GO组。结论 Ti-APTES/GO在促进MC3T3-E1细胞的黏附、增殖及体外成骨分化方面，效果显著优于Ti-DOPA/GO。

关键词: 钛, 氧化石墨烯, 表面改性, 成骨分化

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to compare the osteogenic performance differences of titanium surface coatings modified by dopamine or silanized graphene oxide, and to provide a more suitable modification scheme for titanium surface graphene oxide coatings. Methods Titanium was subjected to alkali-heat treatment and then modified with dopamine and silanization, respectively, followed by coating with graphene oxide. Control and experimental groups were designed as follows: pure titanium (Ti) group; titanium after alkali-heat treatment (Ti-NaOH) group; titanium after alkali-heat treatment and silanization modification (Ti-APTES) group; titanium after alkali-heat treatment and dopamine modification (Ti-DOPA) group; titanium with silanization-modified surface decorated with graphene oxide (Ti-APTES/GO) group; titanium with dopamine-modified surface decorated with graphene oxide (Ti-DOPA/GO) group. The physical and chemical properties of the material surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle goniometer, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Raman spectrometer. The proliferation and adhesion morphology of mouse embryonic osteoblast precursor cells MC3T3-E1 on the material surfaces were observed by cell viability detection and immunofluorescence staining followed by laser confocal microscopy. The effects on the osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells were studied by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, alizarin red staining and quantification, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results After modification with graphene oxide coating, a thin-film-like structure was observed on the surface under SEM. The hydrophilicity of all experimental groups was improved, among which the Ti-DOPA/GO group had the best hydrophilicity. XPS and Raman spectroscopy analysis showed that the modified materials exhibited typical D and G peaks, and XPS revealed the presence of a large number of oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface. CCK8 assay showed that all groups of materials had no cytotoxicity, and the proliferation level of the Ti-APTES/GO group was higher than that of the Ti-DOPA/GO group. Under the laser confocal microscope, the cells in the Ti-DOPA/GO and Ti-APTES/GO groups spread more fully. The Ti-DOPA/GO and Ti-APTES/GO groups had the deepest ALP staining, and the Ti-APTES/GO group had the most alizarin red-stained mineralized nodules and the highest quantitative result of alizarin red staining. In the Ti-DOPA/GO and Ti-APTES/GO groups, the expression of the early osteogenic-related gene RUNX2 reached a relatively high level, while in the expression of the late osteogenic-related genes OPN and OCN, the Ti-APTES/GO group performed better than the Ti-DOPA/GO group. Conclusion Ti-APTES/GO significantly outperformed Ti-DOPA/GO in promoting the adhesion, proliferation, and in vitro osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells

Key words: titanium, graphene oxide, surface modification, osteogenic differentiation

中图分类号:

R782

吴清霖, 赖颖真, 黄艳玲, 谢泽宇, 林彦吟. 经多巴胺或硅烷化修饰的氧化石墨烯钛表面涂层的体外成骨性能研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2025, 43(3): 336-345.

Wu Qinglin, Lai Yingzhen, Huang Yanling, Xie Zeyu, Lin Yanyin. In vitro osteogenic performance study of graphene oxide-coated titanium surfaces modified with dopamine or silane[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2025, 43(3): 336-345.

图/表 8

表 1

图 1

图 2

图 3

图 4

图 5

图 6

图 7

参考文献 43

1	Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies[J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 1969, 3(2): 81-100.
2	Xu JY, Zhang JW, Shi YF, et al. Surface modification of biomedical Ti and Ti alloys: a review on current advances[J]. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(5): 1749.
3	杨帮成, 周学东, 于海洋, 等. 钛种植体表面改性方法[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 124-129.
	Yang BC, Zhou XD, Yu HY, et al. Advances in titanium dental implant surface modification[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2019, 37(2): 124-129.
4	Spriano S, Yamaguchi S, Baino F, et al. A critical review of multifunctional titanium surfaces: new frontiers for improving osseointegration and host response, avoiding bacteria contamination[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 79: 1-22.
5	Xiao X, Xu Y, Fu JJ, et al. Enhanced hydroxyapatite growth and osteogenic activity on polydopamine coated Ti implants[J]. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett, 2015, 7(3): 233-239.
6	Pan HT, Zheng QX, Guo XD, et al. Polydopamine-assisted BMP-2-derived peptides immobilization on biomimetic copolymer scaffold for enhanced bone induction in vitro and in vivo [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 142: 1-9.
7	Cui DP, Guo W, Chang J, et al. Polydopamine-coated polycaprolactone/carbon nanotube fibrous scaffolds loa-ded with basic fibroblast growth factor for wound hea-ling[J]. Mater Today Bio, 2024, 28: 101190.
8	Zhao L, Zhang MY, Guo YF, et al. Alendronate-modified polydopamine-coated paclitaxel nanoparticles for osteosarcoma-targeted therapy[J]. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2019, 53: 101133.
9	Yan M, Liang W, Du L, et al. Metronidazole-loaded polydopamine nanomedicine with antioxidant and antibacterial bioactivity for periodontitis[J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2023, 18(29): 2143-2157.
10	Daneshmandi L, Barajaa M, Tahmasbi Rad A, et al. Graphene-based biomaterials for bone regenerative enginee-ring: a comprehensive review of the field and considerations regarding biocompatibility and biodegradation[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2021, 10(1): e2001414.
11	Moore L, Gatica M, Kim H, et al. Multi-protein delivery by nanodiamonds promotes bone formation[J]. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(11): 976-981.
12	Hao LJ, Li TJ, Wang L, et al. Mechanistic insights into the adsorption and bioactivity of fibronectin on surfaces with varying chemistries by a combination of experimental strategies and molecular simulations[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6(10): 3125-3135.
13	Schünemann FH, Galárraga-Vinueza ME, Magini R, et al. Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 98: 1294-1305.
14	Shin RS, Li Y, Jang LH, et al. Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2016, 105(PB): 255-274.
15	Hermenean A, Codreanu A, Herman H, et al. Chitosan-graphene oxide 3D scaffolds as promising tools for bone regeneration in critical-size mouse calvarial defects[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 16641.
16	Xu K, Tang X, Xiang Y, et al. Impact of high sodium diet on neovascularization and osseointegration around titanium implant: an in vivo and in vivo study[J]. Bio-med Environ Sci, 2024, 37(7): 739-753.
17	He XH, Guo CQ, Wang YH, et al. Enhancing osseointegration of titanium implants through MC3T3-E1 protein-gelatin polyelectrolyte multilayers[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2024, 112(2): e35373.
18	Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1981, 52(2): 155-170.
19	Kaur M, Singh K. Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2019, 102: 844-862.
20	Han X, Ma JX, Tian AX, et al. Surface modification te-chniques of titanium and titanium alloys for biomedical orthopaedics applications: a review[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2023, 227: 113339.
21	Li X, Wang L, Fan Y, et al. Nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2013, 101(8): 2424-2435.
22	Sjöström T, Brydone AS, Meek RM, et al. Titanium nanofeaturing for enhanced bioactivity of implanted orthopedic and dental devices[J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2013, 8(1): 89-104.
23	Chen X, Zhu RF, Gao H, et al. A microstructural study on the alkali-treated titanium subjected to induction hea-ting[J]. J Mater Res Technol, 2022, 20: 281-290.
24	Gao H, Jie YF, Wang ZQ, et al. Bioactive tantalum metal prepared by micro-arc oxidation and NaOH treatment[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2(9): 1216-1224.
25	Gailite L, Scopelliti PE, Sharma VK, et al. Nanoscale roughness affects the activity of enzymes adsorbed on cluster-assembled titania films[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(20): 5973-5981.
26	Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005, 74(1): 49-58.
27	Cheng W, Zeng XW, Chen HZ, et al. Versatile polydopamine platforms: synthesis and promising applications for surface modification and advanced nanomedicine[J]. A-CS Nano, 2019, 13(8): 8537-8565.
28	Guo Q, Chen JS, Wang JL, et al. Recent progress in synthesis and application of mussel-inspired adhesives[J]. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(3): 1307-1324.
29	Yang HL, Xu YZ, Zhu M, et al. Inhibition of titanium-particle-induced inflammatory osteolysis after local administration of dopamine and suppression of osteoclastogenesis via D2-like receptor signaling pathway[J]. Biomaterials, 2016, 80: 1-10.
30	Hanami K, Nakano K, Saito K, et al. Dopamine D2-like receptor signaling suppresses human osteoclastogenesis[J]. Bone, 2013, 56(1): 1-8.
31	Wang C, Chen X, Knierim JJ. Egocentric and allocentric representations of space in the rodent brain[J]. Curr O-pin Neurobiol, 2020, 60: 12-20.
32	Wu MH, Chen FX, Liu HF, et al. Bioinspired sandwich-like hybrid surface functionalized scaffold capable of regulating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis for robust bone regeneration[J]. Mater Today Bio, 2022, 17: 100458.
33	Su JH, Du ZB, Xiao L, et al. Graphene oxide coated titanium surfaces with osteoimmunomodulatory role to enhance osteogenesis[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020, 113: 110983.
34	Dettin M, Herath T, Gambaretto R, et al. Assessment of novel chemical strategies for covalent attachment of adhesive peptides to rough titanium surfaces: XPS analysis and biological evaluation[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2009, 91(2): 463-479.
35	Yu X, Xu R, Zhang Z, et al. Different cell and tissue behavior of micro-/ nano-tubes and micro-/ nano-nets topographies on selective laser melting titanium to enhan-ce osseointegration[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2021, 16: 3329-3342.
36	Senna PM, de Almeida Barros Mourão CF, Mello-Ma-chado RC, et al. Silane-coating strategy for titanium functionalization does not impair osteogenesis in vivo [J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(7): 1814.
37	Wang H, Lai YZ, Xie ZY, et al. Graphene oxide-modified concentric microgrooved titanium surfaces for the dual effects of osteogenesis and antiosteoclastogenesis[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14(49): 54500-54516.
38	Seok JM, Choe G, Lee SJ, et al. Enhanced three-dimensional printing scaffold for osteogenesis using a mussel-inspired graphene oxide coating[J]. Mater Des, 2021, 209: 109941.
39	Li Q, Wang Z. Involvement of FAK/P38 signaling pathways in mediating the enhanced osteogenesis induced by nano-graphene oxide modification on titanium implant surface[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15: 4659-4676.
40	Ren LP, Pan S, Li HQ, et al. Effects of aspirin-loaded graphene oxide coating of a titanium surface on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 15143.
41	Zheng D, Neoh KG, Shi ZL, et al. Assessment of stability of surface anchors for antibacterial coatings and immobilized growth factors on titanium[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2013, 406: 238-246.
42	Ou JF, Wang JQ, Liu S, et al. Tribology study of redu-ced graphene oxide sheets on silicon substrate synthesi-zed via covalent assembly[J]. Langmuir, 2010, 26(20): 15830-15836.
43	Felgueiras HP, Evans MDM, Migonney V. Contribution of fibronectin and vitronectin to the adhesion and morphology of MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells to poly(NaSS) grafted Ti₆Al₄V[J]. Acta Biomater, 2015, 28: 225-233.

基因	引物序列（5'-3'）
RUNX2	AACGATCTGAGATTTGTGGGC CCTGCGTGGGATTTCTTGGTT
ALP	CCAACTCTTTTGTGCCAGAGA GGCTACATTGGTGTTGAGCTTTT
COL-I	GCTCCTCTTAGGGGCCACT CCACGTCTCACCATTGGGG
OCN	CTGACCTCACAGATCCCAAGC TGGTCTGATAGCTCGTCACAAG
OPN	AGCAAGAAACTCTTCCAAGCAA GTGAGATTCGTCAGATTCATCCG
Osterix	ACCCCAAGATGTCTATAAGCCC CGCTCTAGCTCCTGACAGTTG
GAPDH	ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGG GCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC

[1]	张雪颖, 孟鑫, 刘志臻, 张康, 冀洪海, 孙敏敏. 人参皂苷Rb3调节磷酸化细胞外信号调节激酶通路减轻牙周炎大鼠炎症反应促进成骨[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2025, 43(2): 236-248.
[2]	崔晨, 权晶晶, 韦曦. 临床导向的机用镍钛预备器械研究新进展[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(6): 699-705.
[3]	董丹妮, 黄艳玲, 赖颖真, 尹戈. 钛表面不同改性处理后修饰胶原对体外成骨性能影响的比较研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(4): 452-461.
[4]	胡静, 崔智华, 黄克强, 苏荣健, 赵颂. GRP78-c-Src信号通路介导周期性牵张力作用下牙周膜成纤维细胞成骨分化的机制研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(3): 304-312.
[5]	孙艳萍, 廖立. 表面纳米形貌对牙周膜干细胞衰老的作用研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(2): 172-180.
[6]	唐小雪, 周政, 李启期, 姜丹丹. 西格列汀激活基质细胞衍生因子-1/CXC趋化因子受体4信号通路对脂多糖诱导的人牙周膜干细胞增殖、凋亡、炎症和成骨分化的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 37-45.
[7]	王梓, 薛明. 4种机用镍钛锉根管预备后形成牙本质微裂的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 75-81.
[8]	王鸿, 吴清霖, 赖颖真, 蔡艺煌. 氧化石墨烯修饰的类骨单位钛表面对巨噬细胞破骨分化影响的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 165-174.
[9]	张敏, 敖小刚, 郑铮, 陈文川. 低温等离子体促进人牙龈上皮细胞在钛表面的黏附[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 285-292.
[10]	张鹏, 左东川, 牟思宇, 钟宇彤, 袁小平, 曾锦. 内向整流钾2.1通道蛋白对人牙囊细胞成骨分化的影响及其机制研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 139-147.
[11]	张洁, 祝颂松, 姜楠. 微纳米共存的磷酸化涂层对钛植入体骨结合的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 531-539.
[12]	庞鸣, 韦红霞, 陈茜. 长链非编码RNA钾离子电压门控通道亚家族Q成员1重叠转录本1通过靶向miR-24-3p调控人牙周膜干细胞增殖和成骨分化[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 547-554.
[13]	敖小刚, 陈文川. 低温等离子体促进钛种植体骨结合的研究进展[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(5): 566-570.
[14]	温佳慧, 吴燕岷, 陈莉丽. 非编码RNA在人牙周膜来源细胞成骨分化中的作用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(3): 330-337.
[15]	余艺, 周昕, 郑黎薇. 乳牙根管治疗技术的进展[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(2): 205-210.

经多巴胺或硅烷化修饰的氧化石墨烯钛表面涂层的体外成骨性能研究

In vitro osteogenic performance study of graphene oxide-coated titanium surfaces modified with dopamine or silane

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价