数字光处理打印牙科氧化锆的微观结构和机械性能研究

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2021.05.013

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 576-581.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.05.013

数字光处理打印牙科氧化锆的微观结构和机械性能研究

梅子彧(), 鲁雨晴, 楼雨欣, 张隽婧, 孙蔓琳, 于海洋()

口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院修复科，成都 610041

收稿日期:2020-07-18 修回日期:2021-06-20 出版日期:2021-10-01 发布日期:2021-10-11
通讯作者: 于海洋 E-mail:1085427833@qq.com;yhyang6812@scu.edu.cn
作者简介:梅子彧，硕士，E-mail：1085427833@qq.com
基金资助:
四川省科技计划重点研发项目(2020YFS0040)

An investigation of the microstructure and mechanical properties of dental zirconia manufactured by digital light processing 3D printing

Mei Ziyu(), Lu Yuqing, Lou Yuxin, Zhang Junjing, Sun Manlin, Yu Haiyang.()

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2020-07-18 Revised:2021-06-20 Online:2021-10-01 Published:2021-10-11
Contact: Yu Haiyang. E-mail:1085427833@qq.com;yhyang6812@scu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Science and Technology Plan(2020YFS0040);Correspondence: Yu Haiyang, E-mail: yhyang6812@scu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的

研究数字光处理技术（DLP）打印牙科氧化锆的微观结构特征和机械性能，探究其临床应用前景。

方法

以DLP技术制备氧化锆为实验组（DLP组），数控切削技术制备氧化锆为对照组（MILL组），测定其密度、晶粒尺寸及晶相构成以研究微观结构特征，采用三点弯曲试验测量挠曲强度，硬度计测量维氏硬度，单边V槽横梁法测量断裂韧度。

结果

DLP组氧化锆的密度为（6.019 8±0.021 3）g·cm^-3，晶粒尺寸为（0.603 0±0.032 6）μm，与MILL组无统计学差异（P>0.05）。2组氧化锆晶相构成均为单一四方相。DLP组氧化锆挠曲强度为（1 012.7±125.5）MPa，维氏硬度为（1 238.5±10.8）HV₁，略低于MILL组（P<0.05）；断裂韧度为（7.22±0.81）MPa·m^1/2，与MILL组无统计学差异（P>0.05）。

结论

DLP成型牙科氧化锆的微观结构特征及机械性能与切削氧化锆相似，仅挠曲强度和维氏硬度略低于切削氧化锆，显示出良好的临床应用前景。

关键词: 数字光处理, 氧化锆, 微观结构, 挠曲强度, 维氏硬度, 断裂韧度

Abstract: Objective

This study was performed to investigate the microstructure and mechanical properties of dental zirconia manufactured by digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing and the clinical application prospects of this material.

Methods

The experiment (DLP) group was zirconia manufactured by DLP 3D printing, and the control (MILL) group was milled zirconia. The density, grain size, and phase composition were measured to study the microstructure. Flexural strength was measured by using three-point bending tests, while Vickers hardness was determined through a Vickers hardness tester. Fracture toughness was tested using the single-edge V-notched beam method.

Results

Zirconia density of the DLP group was (6.019 8±0.021 3) g·cm^-3, and the average grain size was (0.603 0±0.032 6) μm, but without statistical difference with the corresponding values of the MILL group (P>0.05). Tetragonal phase was found in the X-ray diffraction patterns of the DLP and MILL groups. The flexural strength of the DLP group was (1 012.7±125.5) MPa, and Vickers hardness was (1 238.5±10.8) HV₁, which was slightly lower than that of the MILL group (P<0.05). The fracture toughness of the DLP group was (7.22±0.81) MPa·m^1/2, which was not statistically different from that of the MILL group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Zirconia manufactured by DLP 3D printing had microstructure and mechanical properties similar to those of the milled zirconia. Only the flexural strength and the Vickers hardness of the experimental zirconia were slightly lower than those of the milled zirconia. Therefore, DLP-manufactured zirconia has a promising future for clinical use.

Key words: digital light processing, zirconia, microstructure, flexural strength, Vickers hardness, fracture toughness

中图分类号:

R 783.2

梅子彧, 鲁雨晴, 楼雨欣, 张隽婧, 孙蔓琳, 于海洋. 数字光处理打印牙科氧化锆的微观结构和机械性能研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 576-581.

Mei Ziyu, Lu Yuqing, Lou Yuxin, Zhang Junjing, Sun Manlin, Yu Haiyang.. An investigation of the microstructure and mechanical properties of dental zirconia manufactured by digital light processing 3D printing[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2021, 39(5): 576-581.

图/表 10

表 1

表 2

图 1

图 2

表 3

图 3

图 4

图 5

图 6

图 7

参考文献 11

1	Alao AR, Stoll R, Song XF, et al. Surface quality of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal in CAD/CAM milling, sintering, polishing and sandblasting processes[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017, 65: 102-116.
2	何俊宏, 吴甲民, 陈安南, 等. 增材制造专用陶瓷材料及其成形技术[J]. 中国材料进展, 2020, 39(5): 337-348.
	He JH, Wu JM, Chen AN, et al. Ceramic materials for additive manufacturing and their forming technologies[J]. Mater China, 2020, 39(5): 337-348.
3	李亚运, 司云晖, 熊信柏, 等. 陶瓷3D打印技术的研究与进展[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2017, 45(6): 793-805.
	Li YY, Si YH, Xiong XB, et al. Research and progress on three dimensional printing of ceramic materials[J]. J Chin Ceram Soc, 2017, 45(6): 793-805.
4	Li H, Song L, Sun J, et al. Dental ceramics prostheses by stereolithography-based additive manufacturing: potentials and challenges[J]. Adv Appl Ceram, 2019, 118(1): 30-36.
5	Osman RB, van der Veen AJ, Huiberts D, et al. 3D-prin-ting zirconia implants; a dream or a reality? An in-vitro study evaluating the dimensional accuracy, surface topography and mechanical properties of printed zirconia implant and discs[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017, 75: 521-528.
6	Fischer H, Waindich A, Telle R. Influence of preparation of ceramic SEVNB specimens on fracture toughness te-sting results[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(5): 618-622.
7	Lu Y, Mei Z, Zhang J, et al. Flexural strength and Wei-bull analysis of Y-TZP fabricated by stereolithographic additive manufacturing and subtractive manufacturing[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2020, 40(3): 826-834.
8	Harrer W, Schwentenwein M, Lube T, et al. Fractography of zirconia-specimens made using additive manufacturing (LCM) technology[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2017, 37: 4331-4338.
9	Ozkol E, Zhang W, Ebert J, et al. Potentials of the ''direct injet printing'' method for manufacturing 3Y-TZP based dental restorations[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2012, 32(10): 2193-2201.
10	Wang L, Dou R, Bai M, et al. Characterisation of microstructure and hardness of perovskite-structured Ba_0.5Sr_0.5- Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3-δ under different sintering conditions[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2016, 36(7): 1659-1667.
11	Cui J, Gong Z, Lü M, et al. Effect of notch depth on fracture toughness of zirconia ceramics tested by SEVNB method[J]. Ceram Int, 2018, 44(14): 17218-17223.

组别	密度/（g·cm^-3）	相对密度/%	晶粒尺寸/μm	晶相构成
DLP	6.019 8±0.021 3	99.009 9	0.603 0±0.032 6	四方相
MILL	6.038 2±0.011 5	99.312 5	0.591 1±0.033 0	四方相

组别	n	挠曲强度/MPa	Weibull模量	特征强度/MPa	R²
DLP	30	1 012.7±125.5	9.4	1 067.0	0.96
MILL	30	1 157.6±114.4	12.1	1 207.0	0.94

[1]	李燕, 钟梦怡, 杨瑛. 快速烧结和低温老化对高透氧化锆半透性的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 62-66.
[2]	王莹, 杨家雪, 谢海峰, 陈晨. 充填厚度对光固化大块复合树脂充填效果的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 169-174.
[3]	林珍香, 潘在兴, 叶起清, 郑志强, 林捷. 二硅酸锂陶瓷和氧化锆髓腔固位冠的面厚度设计对抗折性能的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(6): 647-651.
[4]	印准, 战德松, 付佳乐. 表面应用粘接剂、底涂剂对锆瓷与树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(4): 376-379.
[5]	刘皓琰,郑志强,彭诚,林捷. 通用型粘接剂和树脂水门汀对氧化锆剪切粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 476-479.
[6]	陈冰卓, 杨路, 陈莹, 张怀勤, 谢海峰, 何峰. 纳米氢氧化锆涂层对10-甲基丙烯酰氧癸二氢磷酸酯提高氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(3): 252-256.
[7]	宫琪, 孙惠强, 胡以俊, 陈佳, 丁伟山. 不同表面处理方法对氧化锆基底材料与饰面瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(6): 598-602.
[8]	吴金双, 周磊, 邢鹤琳, 王喆, 董超芳, 杨瑟飞. Al₂O₃-氮化硼纳米晶包覆的3%氧化钇稳定的四方氧化锆多晶复合陶瓷粉体的制备[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 461-467.
[9]	卢枳岑, 谢海峰, 章非敏, 张怀勤, 陈晨. 磷酸酯类单体与氧化锆间化学反应模型的建立及作用机制[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(2): 145-149.
[10]	胡国新, 杨瑛, 江月梅, 夏文静. 微波烧结与常规烧结对牙科用氧化锆摩擦磨损性能的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(2): 150-154.
[11]	李斯文, 李施施, 王艳红, 马红梅. 不同表面处理方法对氧化锆陶瓷微观结构和粘接强度影响的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 43-50.
[12]	罗新宇, 孟翔峰. 不同核材料与二氧化锆陶瓷树脂粘接耐久性的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 89-92.
[13]	刘翠玲,杨丽媛,高旭,商红. 氧化锆和纯钛基底冠材料及饰瓷烧结对种植全冠适合性的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016, 34(3): 262-266.
[14]	刘翠玲高旭齐玉萍杨丽媛. 不同设计和饰/釉瓷烧结对氧化锆种植全瓷冠内部和边缘适合性的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 63-67.
[15]	曾强,李宁,周亚男,颜家振,刘文博. 氧化铝喷砂对牙科用氧化锆基底与饰面瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(6): 638-641.

数字光处理打印牙科氧化锆的微观结构和机械性能研究

An investigation of the microstructure and mechanical properties of dental zirconia manufactured by digital light processing 3D printing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 11

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价