West China Journal of Stomatology

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biocompatibility of new bone tissue engineering scaffolds in vivo

LI Yi1, RAN Wei2, WANG Gai-ling1, JING Xiang-dong1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China; 2. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2009-08-25 Revised:2009-08-25 Online:2009-08-20 Published:2009-08-20
  • Contact: LI Yi,Tel:13794418619

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the biocompatibility of new bone tissue engineering scaffolds, A:D, L-polylactic acid(PDLLA)/polylactic acid-polyethylene glycol-polylactic acid-polylactic acid(PLA-PEG-PLA)/Tricalcium phosphate and B: PDLLA/PLA -PEG -PLA in vivo, compared with PDLLA in repair of a rabbit mandibular body defect. Methods 24 New Zealand adult rabbits were divided into 4 groups randomly. 15 mm×6 mm defects were made surgically in the bilateral mandibular bodies and each hemi-mandible was assigned as an experimental unit. The defects were randomly repaired with scaffold materials in each group. Specimens obtained were evaluated with general observation, X-ray, histomorphology and computerized graphical analysis at 2, 4 , 8, 12 weeks after surgery. Results Compared with PDLLA, the new scaffold materials B showed biocompatibility. At the same time the quantity of new bone produced was much more than that in control group(P<0.05). The new scaffold materials A showed the clear chronic granulomatous inflammation. Conclusion New scaffold material B had sound biocompatibility. It was much better than PDLLA. So it may be an ideal bone tissue engineering scaffold material. A is not adapted to be used as scaffold material.

Key words: bone tissue engineering, scaffold material, mandibular defect