华西口腔医学杂志

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

磁性附着体模拟静磁场对成骨细胞增殖活性和周期分布及凋亡率的影响

赵煜1, 2, 李冰雁3, 巢永烈1, 杜莉1   

  1. 1.四川大学华西口腔医院修复科, 四川成都610041; 2.中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院修复科, 广东广州510055; 3.四川大学华西口腔医院关节科, 四川成都610041
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-25 修回日期:2007-10-25 出版日期:2007-10-20 发布日期:2007-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 杜莉,Tel:028- 85501450
  • 作者简介:赵煜(1971-),女,山西人,主治医师,博士
  • 基金资助:

    四川省科委应用基础研究基金资助项目(02sy029.138)

Effects of simulating static magnetic fields of magnetic attachments on osteoblasts prolifer ation, cell cycle distr ibution and apoptosis r atio

ZHAO Yu1,2, LI Bing- yan3, CHAO Yong- lie1, DU Li1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;2. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat- Sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China;3. Dept. of Articulation, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2007-10-25 Revised:2007-10-25 Online:2007-10-20 Published:2007-10-20
  • Contact: DU Li,Tel:028- 85501450

摘要:

目的研究不同强度磁性附着体模拟静磁场对成骨细胞增殖活性、细胞周期及细胞凋亡的影响。方法通过模拟Magnedisc 800磁性附着体静磁场,对体外培养的SD大鼠成骨细胞进行3种强度(12.5、125、250 mT)、持续不同时间的静磁场加载,检测成骨细胞的增殖活性,流式细胞术分析细胞周期分布和细胞凋亡率。结果成骨细胞加载3种强度的静磁场1、3、5、7、9 d后,细胞增殖活性未发生明显改变,各组细胞生长趋势基本一致,静磁场作用无明显的剂量- 效应关系。成骨细胞加载1、3、5、7 d后,未发现静磁场对G0 /G1期、S期、G2/M期细胞百分比、增殖指数及细胞凋亡率产生明显影响。结论磁性附着体静磁场在闭合磁路、磁体和衔铁的闭合过程中以及开放磁路下,对成骨细胞的增殖均无明显的促进和抑制作用,未改变细胞的周期分布和促进细胞凋亡的发生。

关键词: 磁性附着体, 静磁场, 成骨细胞, 增殖活性, 细胞周期, 细胞凋亡

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of the static magnetic field(SMF) generated by dental magnetic attachments on osteoblastic proliferations, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis ratio. Methods By simulating those of the closed- field, the closure process and the open- field Magnedisc 800 magnetic attachments respectively, the in vitro cultured rat osteoblasts were exposed continuously to 12.5, 125, 250 mT SMF. The effects of the SMF on the proliferation of the cells were examined. MTT colorimetry test was performed to detect the effect of the SMF on the vitalities of cells. Flow cytometry was utilized to analyze the cell cycles and cell apoptosis rates. Results The SMF exposure didn′t change the vital osteoblasts number, the cell cycle distribution and proliferation activities of osteoblasts. The cell apoptosis situation were not observed statistical differences. Conclusion No matter the closed- field, the closure process and the open- field magnetic attachments respectively, continuous simulating SMF- stimulation of magnetic attachments couldn′t change osteoblasts proliferation activity, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis ratio.

Key words: magnetic attachment, static magnetic field, osteoblasts, proliferation, cell cycle distribution, cell apoptosis