临床导向的机用镍钛预备器械研究新进展

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024225

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 699-705.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024225

临床导向的机用镍钛预备器械研究新进展

崔晨(), 权晶晶, 韦曦()

中山大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科，广东省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心，广州 510055

收稿日期:2024-06-12 修回日期:2024-07-09 出版日期:2024-12-01 发布日期:2024-11-29
通讯作者: 韦曦 E-mail:cuich7@mail.sysu.edu.cn;weixi@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:崔晨，主治医师，博士，E-mail：cuich7@mail.sysu.edu.cn|韦曦，主任医师、教授、博士生导师，中山大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科主任。兼任中华口腔医学会牙体牙髓病学专业委员会副主任委员，广东省口腔医学会牙体牙髓病学专业委员会主任委员，国家医师资格考试口腔类别试题开发专家委员会委员。主要从事牙髓病根尖周病的防治研究，擅长牙体牙髓疾病的显微与数字化治疗。发表学术论文200余篇，其中SCI收录96篇，主编、副主编专著6部。主持国家自然科学基金、省部级科研项目等18项，获省部级科技进步奖6项、省级教学成果一等奖3项。，教授，博士，E-mail：weixi@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(82370943);广州地区临床重大技术项目(2023P-ZD07)

Research progress in problem-solving nickel-titanium rotary instrument in endodontics

Cui Chen(), Quan Jingjing, Wei Xi()

Dept. of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University & Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center of Oral Diseases, Guangzhou 510055, China

Received:2024-06-12 Revised:2024-07-09 Online:2024-12-01 Published:2024-11-29
Contact: Wei Xi E-mail:cuich7@mail.sysu.edu.cn;weixi@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82370943);The Key Clinical Technical Pro-ject of Guangzhou(2023P-ZD07)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根管治疗是牙髓及根尖周疾病的主要治疗手段，为了增进根管清理和成形的效果，不同材质和设计的根管预备器械不断涌现，其中机用镍钛预备器械极大提高了根管预备效率。然而，随着根管系统解剖复杂性、根管治疗目的和预后的认识的深入，临床实践对机用镍钛预备器械提出了新需求，这些基于临床导向的需求为器械改革创新提供了动力。目前镍钛预备系统不断推陈出新，新型机用镍钛预备系统的改良及优势何在，其如何提高根管预备效率，本文拟对这类问题进行系统阐述。

关键词: 根管治疗, 镍钛器械, 机动预备, 微创, 效率, 临床应用

Abstract:

Root canal therapy is the primary treatment method for pulpal and periapical diseases. Various advanced endodontic instruments for mechanical preparation have been marketed. The emergence of nickel-titanium rotary instruments has greatly improved the efficiency of root canal preparation. New demands have been put forward for nickel-titanium rotary instruments as a result of the deepening of clinicians’ awareness of root canal anatomy system as well as the purpose and prognosis of root canal treatment. These clinical-oriented demands accelerate instrument reform and innovation. This work presents new marketed nickel-titanium systems and discusses the advantages and limitations of these systems and how they perform in terms of the efficiency and outcome of root canal preparation.

Key words: root canal therapy, nickel-titanium instrument, rotary preparation, minimally invasive, efficiency, clinical application

中图分类号:

R781.05

崔晨, 权晶晶, 韦曦. 临床导向的机用镍钛预备器械研究新进展[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(6): 699-705.

Cui Chen, Quan Jingjing, Wei Xi. Research progress in problem-solving nickel-titanium rotary instrument in endodontics[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 42(6): 699-705.

参考文献 44

1	White JM, Eakle WS. Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2000, 131 Suppl: 13S-19S.
2	Clark D, Khademi J. Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation[J]. Dent Clin N Am, 2010, 54(2): 249-273.
3	Plotino G, Özyürek T, Grande NM, et al. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study[J]. Int Endod J, 2019, 52(3): 343-351.
4	Silva EJNL, Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, et al. The impact of TruNatomy and ProTaper gold instruments on the pre-servation of the periradicular dentin and on the enlargement of the apical canal of mandibular molars[J]. J Endod, 2022, 48(5): 650-658.
5	Ribeiro G, Martin V, Rodrigues C, et al. Comparative evaluation of the canal shaping ability, pericervical dentin preservation, and smear layer removal of TruNatomy, WaveOne gold, and ProTaper ultimate—an ex vivo study in human teeth[J]. J Endod, 2023, 49(12): 1733-1738.
6	Gucyetmez Topal B, Falakaloglu S, Silva E, et al. Sha-ping ability of novel nickel-titanium systems in printed primary molars[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2023, 33(2): 168-177.
7	Romeiro K, Brasil SC, Souza TM, et al. Influence of brushing motions on the shaping of oval canals by rotary and reciprocating instruments[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2023, 27(7): 3973-3981.
8	Ürgüplüoğlu SN, Akıncı L, Şimşek N. Micro-computed tomography analysis of shaping ability of nickel-tita-nium instruments activated by continuous rotation or ada-ptive motion[J]. Aust Endod J, 2024. doi: 10.1111/aej. 12850 .
9	Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Markou G. The effect of different access cavity designs in combination with WaveOne gold and TruNatomy instrumentation on remaining dentin thickness and volume[J]. J Endod, 2023, 49(1): 83-88.
10	Gunes B, Yesildal Yeter K. Effects of different glide path files on apical debris extrusion in curved root canals[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(7): 1191-1194.
11	Zheng LX, Ji XF, Li CX, et al. Comparison of glide paths created with K-files, PathFiles, and the ProGlider file, and their effects on subsequent WaveOne preparation in curved canals[J]. BMC Oral Heal, 2018, 18(1): 152.
12	van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of two single rotary glide path systems[J]. Int Endod J, 2019, 52(3): 352-358.
13	Liu JY, Zhou ZX, Tseng WJ, et al. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of manual K-files and reciprocating files in glide path preparation: a micro-computed tomography study of constricted canals[J]. BMC Oral Heal, 2021, 21(1): 83.
14	van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, et al. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-wire, and gold wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper next, and WaveOne gold instruments in maxillary first molars[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(1): 62-67.
15	Ha JH, Kwak SW, Versluis A, et al. Buckling resistance of various nickel-titanium glide path preparation instruments in dynamic or static mode[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(8): 1125-1129.
16	Aydın ZU, Keskin NB, Özyürek T, et al. Microcomputed assessment of transportation, centering ratio, canal area, and volume increase after single-file rotary and reciprocating glide path instrumentation in curved root canals: a laboratory study[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(6): 791-796.
17	Danaci Z, Yeter KY. Evaluation of pain following the use of different single-file glide path systems: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Endod, 2024, 50(2): 120-128.
18	Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Markou G. The effect of different molar access cavity designs on root canal sha-ping times using rotation and reciprocation instruments in mandibular first molars[J]. J Endod, 2022, 48(7): 887-892.
19	Plotino G, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F, et al. Influence of negotiation, glide path, and preflaring procedures on root canal shaping-terminology, basic concepts, and a syste-matic review[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(6): 707-729.
20	De-Deus G, Arruda TE, Souza EM, et al. The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path[J]. Int Endod J, 2013, 46(10): 993-998.
21	Zuolo ML, Carvalho MC, De-Deus G. Negotiability of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using a reciprocating system[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11): 1913-1917.
22	Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC. Cyclic fatigue resistance of K3, K3XF, and twisted file nickel-titanium files under continuous rotation or reciprocating motion[J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(12): 1585-1588.
23	Kiefner P, Ban M, De-Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2014, 47(5): 430-436.
24	De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(2): 357-361.
25	Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, et al. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(6): 852-856.
26	Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, et al. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(4): 548-552.
27	Saber SEDM, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth[J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(1): 109-114.
28	Eliasz W, Czarnecka B, Surdacka A. Apical extrusion of debris during root canal preparation with ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold and Twisted Files[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(21): 6254.
29	Shetty V, Yelke S, Wahjuningrum DA, et al. Post-operative quality of life after single-visit root canal treatment employing three different instrumentation techniques—An institutional randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(4): 1535.
30	Belladonna FG, Carvalho MS, Cavalcante DM, et al. Micro-computed tomography shaping ability assessment of the new blue thermal treated reciproc instrument[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(7): 1146-1150.
31	De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Simões-Carvalho M, et al. Shaping efficiency as a function of time of a new heat-treated instrument[J]. Int Endod J, 2019, 52(3): 337-342.
32	Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2018, 51(5): 564-571.
33	Kim HC, Sung SY, Ha JH, et al. Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation[J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(12): 1572-1575.
34	Pawar AM, Bhardwaj A, Zanza A, et al. Severity of post-operative pain after instrumentation of root canals by XP-Endo and SAF full sequences compared to manual instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(23): 7251.
35	Nayak A, Kankar PK, Jain N, et al. Force and vibration correlation analysis in the self-adjusting file during root canal shaping: an in-vitro study[J]. J Dent Sci, 2018, 13(3): 184-189.
36	Moreinos D, Dakar A, Stone NJ, et al. Evaluation of time to fracture and vertical forces applied by a novel gentlefile system for root canal preparation in simulated root canals[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(3): 505-508.
37	Neelakantan P, Khan K, Li KY, et al. Effectiveness of supplementary irrigant agitation with the Finisher GF Brush on the debridement of oval root canals instrumented with the Gentlefile or nickel titanium rotary instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2018, 51(7): 800-807.
38	Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K, et al. Cleaning and sha-ping ability of gentlefile, HyFlex EDM, and ProTaper next instruments: a combined micro-computed tomographic and scanning electron microscopic study[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(7): 973-979.
39	Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, et al. The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(10): 909-916.
40	Pasricha SK, Makkar S, Gupta P. Pressure alteration techniques in endodontics-a review of literature[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(3): ZE01-ZE06.
41	Alves FRF, Andrade-Junior CV, Marceliano-Alves MF, et al. Adjunctive steps for disinfection of the mandibular molar root canal systema: a correlative bacteriologic, micro-computed tomography, and cryopulverization approach[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(11): 1667-1672.
42	Lloyd A, Uhles JP, Clement DJ, et al. Elimination of intracanal tissue and debris through a novel laser-activated system assessed using high-resolution micro-computed tomography: a pilot study[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(4): 584-587.
43	Tong J, Liu L, Du J, et al. Effect of photon-induced photoacoustic streaming and shock-wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming technique on the removal of the smear layer after root canal preparation in curved root canals[J]. J Dent Sci, 2023, 18(1): 157-164.
44	Erkan EH, Gündoğar M, Uslu G, et al. Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Odontology, 2022, 110(4): 786-794.

[1]	周静, 王露凝, 于健, 王昭领, 陈虹瑜. 数字化辅助下双窗法微创摘除伴高位埋伏尖牙的牙瘤1例[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(6): 816-821.
[2]	贺兰稀, 居来提·吾麦尔null, 周子航, 于健, 王昭领, 陈虹瑜. 数字化辅助下牙根先脱位拔除上颌第二磨牙根分叉间埋伏第三磨牙1例[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(3): 403-408.
[3]	陈红, 张荣华, 赵媛. 上颌侧切牙Ⅲ型双牙内陷伴根尖周炎非手术治疗1例[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(3): 409-414.
[4]	王梓, 薛明. 4种机用镍钛锉根管预备后形成牙本质微裂的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 75-81.
[5]	朱桂全, 李春洁. 内镜下唾液腺切除术式的变迁与趋势——从内镜辅助到完全内镜[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(4): 377-384.
[6]	蔡美娟, 向绍雯, 谢成婕, 欧阳楚红, 童方丽. 意向性牙再植治疗下颌第二磨牙根管治疗失败病例1例[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(4): 471-477.
[7]	苏文祺, 李静雯, 蒋立姗, 崔雯洁, 赵阳, 李厚轩. 口腔显微镜辅助种植体表面去污的体外研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 350-355.
[8]	黄佳玥, 刘显, 王艳, 包崇云. 牙囊在埋伏上颌中切牙唇侧微创开放式牵引中的作用探讨[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 197-202.
[9]	李成蹊, 宋卫健. 上颌侧切牙Ⅱ型和ⅢA型双牙内陷根管治疗1例[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 232-236.
[10]	赵志河, 金作林, 白玉兴, 房兵, 白丁, 李巍然, 贺红, 胡敏, 刘月华, 陈莉莉, 宋锦璘, 曹阳, 李宇, 舒睿. 正畸牙移动核心科学问题：目标位、效率、精准度[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 371-376.
[11]	高羽轩, 汪鎏, 傅裕杰, 杨帆, 张岚, 黄定明. 数字化导板引导技术辅助微创治疗前牙钙化根管[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 111-122.
[12]	张婷, 陈度, 苗雷英, 谢思静, 汤旭娜. 激光熔融数字化导板技术辅助钙化根管的治疗[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(5): 525-531.
[13]	乐鑫, 申静, 张海峰. 比较3种微套管装置提取分离器械效果的体外实验研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(2): 160-165.
[14]	余艺, 周昕, 郑黎薇. 乳牙根管治疗技术的进展[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(2): 205-210.
[15]	佘雅鹄,张一祎,刘雨萱,方厂云. 牙尖覆盖厚度对全瓷高嵌体修复前磨牙应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 636-641.

临床导向的机用镍钛预备器械研究新进展

Research progress in problem-solving nickel-titanium rotary instrument in endodontics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价