新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器与伞形剥离器行陡峭羊上颌窦底黏膜剥离的研究

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2018.05.005

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 488-492.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.05.005

新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器与伞形剥离器行陡峭羊上颌窦底黏膜剥离的研究

李长健(),吕源,李岩峰(),樊佳东,刘乐,张月

中国人民解放军总医院第一附属医院口腔科,北京 100048

收稿日期:2018-01-05 修回日期:2018-07-09 出版日期:2018-10-01 发布日期:2018-10-18
作者简介:李长健,住院医师,硕士,E-mail： 494955789@qq.com
基金资助:
首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广项目(Z171100001017154);解放军总医院转化医学项目(2017TM-030)

Comparison of stripping of steep sheep maxillary sinus mucosal with new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper and umbrella stripper

Changjian Li(),Yuan Lü,Yanfeng Li(),Jiadong Fan,Le Liu,Yue Zhang

Dept. of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2018-01-05 Revised:2018-07-09 Online:2018-10-01 Published:2018-10-18
Supported by:
Capital Characteristic Clinical Application Research and Achievement Promotion Project(Z171100001017154);PLA General Hospital Translational Medicine Project(2017TM-030)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的在陡峭羊上颌窦行经牙槽嵴顶的上颌窦底内提升术,使用0.012、0.014型号新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器以及伞形剥离器剥离窦底黏膜,测量剥离长度,对比剥离效果。方法经羊头颅计算机体层摄影选择窦底有60°~90°坡度的山羊,建立动物模型72个,并随机分成3组（n=24）：A（0.012型号）、B（0.014型号）、C（伞形剥离器）组。冲顶后行经牙槽嵴上颌窦底黏膜的剥离,待达到剥离极限或黏膜穿孔时测量剥离长度。结果 A组剥离黏膜的平均长度为11.3 mm±4.6 mm,3例出现上颌窦黏膜穿孔;B组剥离黏膜的平均长度为17.5 mm±5.0 mm,1例出现上颌窦黏膜穿孔;C组剥离黏膜的平均长度为4.2 mm±1.3 mm,4例出现上颌窦黏膜穿孔。经方差分析得3组总体均值不全相同（P<0.01）,再通过Dunnett’s T3检验得出,3组剥离窦底黏膜长度的均数两两比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器能够有效剥离陡峭的上颌窦底黏膜,而0.014型号剥离效果更好,且相对安全。

关键词: 上颌窦, 上颌窦底提升, 新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器

Abstract:

Objective This work aims to investigate the effect of stripping of steep sheep maxillary sinus by using 0.012 or 0.014 model new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper and umbrella stripper. Methods Goats with sinus floor gradients of 60° to 90° were selected by computed tomography of sheep head. A total of 72 animal models were established and rando-mized into three groups (n=24): group A (0.012 model), B (0.014 model) and C (umbrella stripper). Alveolar and maxillary sinus mucosa were stripped after crowning, and stripping length was measured when the stripping limit was reached or mucosal perforation occurred. Results The average stripping length of mucosa in group A was 11.3 mm±4.6 mm, and three cases experienced perforation of sinus floor mucosa. The average stripping length of mucosa in group B was 17.5 mm±5.0 mm, and one case experienced perforation of sinus floor mucosa. The average stripping length of mucosa in group C was 4.2 mm±1.3 mm, and four cases experienced perforation of sinus floor mucosa. The difference among the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.01) according to variance analysis. Moreover, the comparison between any two means was also statistically significant according to Dunnett’s T3 test (P<0.05). Conclusion The new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper effectively stripped steep maxillary sinus mucosa. The 0.014 model exhibited superior peeling effect and was relatively safe.

Key words: maxillary sinus, maxillary sinus bottom, new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper

中图分类号:

R783

李长健,吕源,李岩峰,樊佳东,刘乐,张月. 新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器与伞形剥离器行陡峭羊上颌窦底黏膜剥离的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(5): 488-492.

Changjian Li,Yuan Lü,Yanfeng Li,Jiadong Fan,Le Liu,Yue Zhang. Comparison of stripping of steep sheep maxillary sinus mucosal with new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper and umbrella stripper[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 36(5): 488-492.

图/表 4

参考文献 13

[1]	樊佳东, 李岩峰, 刘乐 , 等. 新型剥离器与伞形剥离器行羊上颌窦黏膜剥离对比实验[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016,34(5):506-510. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2016.05.015 URL
	Fan JD, Li YF, Liu L , et al. Comparative experiments of stripping sheep maxillary sinus mucosal with new-type strip-per and umbrella detacher[J]. West Chin J Stomatol, 2016,34(5):506-510. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2016.05.015 URL
[2]	Fan J, Hu P, Li Y , et al. Goat model for direct visualizing the effectiveness of detaching sinus mucosa in real time during crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2017,43(4):247-253. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00102 URL
[3]	Summers RB . A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique[J]. Compendium, 1994, 15(2): 152, 154-156. URL pmid: 8055503
[4]	Emmerich D, Att W, Stappert C . Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Perio-dontol, 2005,76(8):1237-1251. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1237 URL pmid: 16101354
[5]	沈庆赋, 阎军峰, 李俊梅 , 等. 上颌窦提升牙种植术中窦黏膜穿孔的预防及处理的临床研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2012,28(11):689-690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2012.11.020 URL
	Shen QF, Yan JF, Li JM , et al. Prevention and treatment of mucosal membrane breakage in maxillary sinus lifting with dental implants[J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2012,28(11):689-690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2012.11.020 URL
[6]	Schwarz L, Schiebel V, Hof M , et al. Risk factors of mem-brane perforation and postoperative complications in sinus floor elevation surgery: review of 407 augmentation proce-dures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,73(7):1275-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.039 URL
[7]	Mazor Z, Kfir E, Lorean A , et al. Flapless approach to ma-xillary sinus augmentation using minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation[J]. Implant Dent, 2011,20(6):434-438. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182391fe3 URL
[8]	Ucer TC . Use of negative air pressure by nasal suction during maxillary sinus floor lift: audit of 13 consecutive sinus grafts[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009,47(2):151-152. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.07.193 URL
[9]	杨炎忠, 田小华, 李小凤 , 等. 经牙槽嵴顶入路液压提升法提升上颌窦底黏膜并植骨同期种植的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015,24(6):721-725.
	Yang YZ, Tian XH, Li XF , et al. Clinical study of sinus elevation by hydraulic and implant placement followed by bone graft simultaneously[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2015,24(6):721-725.
[10]	王丽萍, 张树标, 范长斌 , 等. 超声内提升骨刀在上颌窦内提升术中的临床应用[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2010,20(3):187-191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2010.03.009 URL
	Wang LP, Zhang SB, Fan CB , et al. Inner lifting in osteo-tome sinus floor elevation technique with ultrasound bone knife[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,20(3):187-191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2010.03.009 URL
[11]	Reiser GM, Rabinovitz Z, Bruni J , et al. Evaluation of ma-xillary sinus membrane response following elevation with the crestal osteotome technique in human cadavers[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofacl Implants, 2001,16(6):833-840.
[12]	Ucer TC . A modified transantral endoscopic technique for the removal of a displaced dental implant from the maxil-lary sinus followed by simultaneous sinus grafting[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009,24(5):947-951.
[13]	Tobita T, Nakamura M, Ueno T , et al. Sinus augmentation surgery after endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of chronic maxillary sinusitis: a case report[J]. Implant Dent, 2011,20(5):337-340. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182310dd0 URL

[1]	杨大维, 肖静宜, 张鹏, 路泊遥, 梁星. 植骨和种植体突入长度对经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升骨改建影响的回顾性研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 570-575.
[2]	郑小菲, 莫安春, 朱娟芳, 王素苹, 杜雅晶, 姚永治. 上颌窦解剖因素对经牙槽嵴顶上颌窦底提升术成骨效果的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(6): 652-656.
[3]	黄江琴, 胡常琦, 夏勋, 郭水根, 龚金梅, 魏洪武. 经牙槽嵴顶上颌窦底提升同期植入短种植体的回顾性研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(6): 667-671.
[4]	辛禧瑞,蔡青,汪汉池,周延民. 上颌后牙游离端应用倾斜种植的研究进展[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(1): 86-89.
[5]	王虎, 谭震, 游梦, 刘文佳. 上颌窦囊性改变的影像分类诊断及上颌窦提升术的探讨[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 457-462.
[6]	李晓宇,伍靖,曹君,杨微,武斌,谢春. 脱细胞真皮基质复合小牛脱细胞骨修复口腔上颌窦瘘[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 633-637.
[7]	樊佳东李岩峰刘乐韩奕诗胡品张月包文雅. 新型剥离器与伞形剥离器行羊上颌窦黏膜剥离对比实验[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016, 34(5): 506-510.
[8]	吕源韩奕诗李岩峰任桓樊佳东刘茜胡品包文雅 . 山羊上颌窦及额窦黏膜厚度与可承受压强相关研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 59-62.
[9]	王虎. 口腔种植术前锥形束CT影像评估上颌窦状况[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(4): 331-335.
[10]	段志坚叶平吴润发白彭芮瑞黄忞谢晨. 锥形束CT对上牙槽后动脉骨孔的测量分析研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(6): 581-583.
[11]	何静雷逸灵王丽琼. 超声骨刀在闭合式上颌窦底提升术中应用的护理[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2013, 31(6): 583-584.
[12]	黄建生. 上颌后牙区骨量不足种植的风险与对策[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(1): 1-9.
[13]	吴平凡郭凌燕陈林林. 鼻内窥镜在取上颌窦内牙齿断根中的临床应用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2011, 29(06): 663-664.
[14]	周磊徐淑兰徐世同黄建生宋光保张雪洋. Summers骨凿提升上颌窦的临床应用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2008, 26(03): 296-298.
[15]	方丽琼!310006. 病灶牙伴上颌窦炎及继发性青光眼一例报告[J]. , 1997, 15(01): 0-.

新型记忆弹性丝套管剥离器与伞形剥离器行陡峭羊上颌窦底黏膜剥离的研究

Comparison of stripping of steep sheep maxillary sinus mucosal with new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper and umbrella stripper

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 13

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价