华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

1950—2005年我国龋病临床研究文献的质量评价

李彩 郝玉庆 周学东   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室, 四川大学, 四川成都610041
  • 收稿日期:2008-02-25 修回日期:2008-02-25 出版日期:2008-02-20 发布日期:2008-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 周学东,Tel:028- 85501439
  • 作者简介:李彩(1973-),女,河南人,主治医师,硕士

Quality evaluation on Chinese clinical r esear ch liter atur es about dental caries in 1950- 2005

LI Cai, HAO Yu- qing, ZHOU Xue- dong   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2008-02-25 Revised:2008-02-25 Online:2008-02-20 Published:2008-02-20
  • Contact: ZHOU Xue- dong,Tel:028- 85501439

摘要:

目的了解我国龋病临床研究的质量水平。方法通过电子和手工检索1950—2005年我国龋病临床研究文献,采用Jadad量表进行质量评价。结果我国1950—2005年公开发表的龋病临床研究文献共有3 201篇,其中高质量研究文献为46篇,仅占1.44%。3 201篇文献中,142篇(4.44%)提到了具体的随机分配方法,26篇(0.81%)对双盲的措施进行了描述,256篇(8.00%)对治疗期退出与失访的病例进行了描述。结论我国龋病临床研究文献质量有待进一步提高。

关键词: 龋病, 质量评价, 临床研究

Abstract:

Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality level of Chinese clinical research about dental caries in 1950- 2005. Methods The Chinese clinical research literatures about dental caries in 1950- 2005 were collected. All the literatures were evaluated by Jadad scale. The score of Jadad scale was form 0 to 5. Score 2 and below was poor quality literature, and score 3 and more was high quality literature. The full marks of Jadad scale was 5. Results 3 201 clinical research papers about dental caries were collected, in which 46 articles were high quality literature. In 3 201 papers, random allocation methods were mentioned in 142 papers, double- blind measure were performed in 26 papers, the withdrawn and missing cases were described in 256 papers. Conclusion The high quality literature of Chinese clinical research about dental caries in scientific research design is less. The scientific research design should be strength to enhance the total quality of Chinese clinical research about dental caries.

Key words: dental caries, quality evaluation, clinical research