华西口腔医学杂志

• 专栏论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔多菌种生物膜对防龋中药敏感性的实验研究

赵今;李继遥;朱昞;周学东;肖晓蓉   

  1. 口腔生物医学工程教育部重点实验室四川大学,,四川成都610041
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-25 修回日期:2006-12-25 出版日期:2006-12-20 发布日期:2006-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 周学东,Tel: 028-85501439
  • 作者简介:赵今(1968-),女,云南人,副教授,博士,现在新疆医科大学第一附属医院口腔科工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(30430800)

Study of Susceptibility of Oral Bacteria Biofilm to Traditional Chinese Drug Preventing Caries

 ZHAO Jin.LI Ji-yao. ZHU Bing, ZHOU Xue-dong, XIAO Xiao-rong   

  1. Key. Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education. Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2006-12-25 Revised:2006-12-25 Online:2006-12-20 Published:2006-12-20

摘要:

 目的采用MBECTM-Device研究防龋中药五倍予多酚性化合物(GCE)、五倍子B(GCE-B)、蜂房95%组分(NVEI)对多菌种生物膜细菌的生长抑制作用,建立防龋中药药效学的药物敏感实验方法,为临床实验提供客观的药物作用的浓度范围。方法选择与龋病发生密切相关的4种口腔细菌形成多菌种生物膜,药物为GCE、GCE-B、NVEl,扫描电镜观察口腔细菌在MBEC州一Device上形成细菌生物膜的能力和形成情况;采用MBECn._HTP_Assav测定药物对口腔细菌的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和对细菌生物膜的最小生物膜清除浓度(MBEC)。结果在MBFCm_Device提供的桩钉表面上I]腔细菌能形成良好的生物膜结构,从不同时段取出酌样本可以观察到细菌从定植粘附到生物膜形成以及生物膜成熟结构。GCE. GCE-B、NVEl对口腔细菌均有良好的抑制作用。GCE、GCE-B对口腔生物膜细菌有很好的抑制作用,但是NVEI对口腔生物膜细菌的抑制作用较差。药物对口腔生物膜细菌的MBEC是MIC的2-16倍。结论中药五倍子多酚性化合物和五倍子B对口腔生物膜细菌有很好的抑制和清除效应,MBEC比MIC能更客观地反映药物作用的浓度范围

关键词: 五倍子, 蜂房, 细菌生物膜, 龋病

Abstract:

 Objective Using MBECTM-Assay to assay minimal hiof'ilm eradication concentratio( MBEC) of Galla Chinensis and Nidus Vespae to oral bacterial hiof'ilm. To set up traditional Chinese medicine susceptibility pharmacodynamic empirical study methods of oral bacterial biofilm. Methods  Cariogenic bacteria strains were selec:tecl Streptococcus mutan_s ATCC 25175, Streptococcu_s .sangui.s ATCC 10556. Lactobacillus rhamnosus AC 413. Actinomyces naeslundii WVU 627) in this study. Extraction components of Galla Chinensis were CCE( aqueous extract),  GJCE -B( 30%  alcohol  extract)  and  extraction  components  of Nidus  Vespae  were  NVEI( 95%  alcohol extract). LI)To observe oral bacterial biof'ilm formatiom in MBECTM一Device at diff'erent time.(②MBECTM-HTP-Assay: The minimal inhibitory concentration( MIC) and minimal biofilm eradication concentration( MBEC) of' (GCE. GJCE-B and NVEI to oral bacteria strains were determined. Results Oral bacterial biofilm were readily formed on the lid of MBECm'_Device under selected condition observed by SEM). Oral cariogenic hacteria growing as plankton populations were sensitive to GCE. GCE-B and NVEI. To GCE. GCE-B and NVEl. oral cariogenic bacterial biofilm were 2-16 times less susceptible than growing plankton bacteria. GCE and GCE-B were the most eff'ective medicine against oral cariogenic hacterial biof'ilm. NVEl were effective in killing oral-bacterial biofilm at relatively high concentration. Conclusion  GCE and GCE-B were effective medicine against oral cariogenic bacterial biofilm. MBEC( minimal biof'ilm eradication concentration) can provide a relative accurate medicine concentration f'or clinical test.

Key words: GallaChinesis, NidusVespae, oralbacterialbiofilm, caries