华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

螺纹种植体螺距的优化设计和应力分析

孔亮1, 刘宝林2, 胡开进1, 李德华2, 宋应亮2, 马攀2, 杨劲3   

  1. 1.第四军医大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科; 2.种植科, 陕西西安710032; 3.西北工业大学力学与土木建筑学院, 陕西西安710072
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-25 修回日期:2006-12-25 出版日期:2006-12-20 发布日期:2006-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘宝林,Tel:029- 84776451
  • 作者简介:孔亮( 1979-),男,陕西人,博士研究生

Optimized Thr ead Pitch Design and Str ess Analysis of the Cylinder Scr ewed Dental Implant

KONG Liang1, LIU Bao- lin2, HU Kai- jin1, LI De- hua2, SONG Ying- liang2, MA Pan2, YANG Jin3   

  1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China; 2. Dept. of Implantology, College of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China; 3. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi′an 710072, China
  • Received:2006-12-25 Revised:2006-12-25 Online:2006-12-20 Published:2006-12-20
  • Contact: LIU Bao- lin,Tel:029- 84776451

摘要:

目的应用Ansys Workbench DesignXplorer优化设计模块,探讨圆柱状V形螺纹种植体螺距变化对颌骨和
种植体应力大小的影响,为临床设计和选择最佳的螺纹参数提供理论依据。方法建立了包含圆柱状V形螺纹种植
体的颌骨骨块三维有限元模型,设定螺纹螺距( P)范围为0.5~1.6 mm,观察P变化对颌骨和种植体Equivale(nt EQV)
应力峰值的影响。结果在垂直向加载中皮质骨、松质骨和种植体的EQV应力峰值增幅分别为7.1%、123.4%和
28.7%;在颊舌向加载中皮质骨、松质骨和种植体的EQV增幅分别为2.8%、28.8%和14.9%;在各种加载情况下,当
变量P大于0.8 mm时,对颌骨及种植体的EQV应力峰值响应曲线曲率位于- 1和1之间。结论松质骨的应力大小更
易受到螺距的影响;螺纹对垂直加载时的力学传递影响更明显;螺距在保护种植体垂直受力时起着更为重要的作
用;圆柱状螺纹种植体螺距最佳设计应不小于0.8 mm,但同时应避免过大的螺距。

关键词: 牙种植体, 三维有限元分析, 优化设计, Von Mises 应力, 螺距

Abstract:

Objective To determine the optimal thread pitch for an experimental cylinder implant in Ansys Workbench
Design Xplorer environment. Methods Finite element models of segment jaw bone with a V- shaped thread
implant were created. The thread pitc(h P)was set from 0.5 mm to 1.6 mm. The maximum Equivalent stresse(s EQV
stresses) in jaw bone and in implant were evaluated. Results Under axial load, the amplification of maximum EQV
stresses in cortical bone, cancellous bone and implant were 7.1%, 123.4% and 28.7% respectively. Under buccolingual
load, the amplification of maximum EQV stresses in cortical bone, cancellous bone and implant were 2.8%,
28.8% and 14.9% respectively. When P exceeded 0.8 mm, the response curve curvature of maximum EQV stresses in
jaw bone and in implant to P was ranged from - 1 to 1. Conclusion Stresses in cancellous bone are more sensitive
to thread pitch than in cortical bone. Stresses in jaw bone under axial load are easier affected by thread pitch than
under bucco- lingual load. Thread pitch plays a greater role in protecting dental implant under axial load than under
bucco- lingual load. Thread pitch exceed 0.8 mm should be the optimal design in a cylinder implant, but oversized
pitch should be avoided too.

Key words: dentalimplant, three-dimensionalfiniteelementanalysis, optimizeddesign