华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

反复烧结对牙科二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷颜色和透光性的影响

钱冬冬 张蕾 骆小平 陈文莉   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院修复科,南京 210008
  • 出版日期:2015-02-01 发布日期:2015-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 骆小平,教授,博士,E-mail:L_xiaoping@yahoo.com
  • 作者简介:钱冬冬,副主任技师,学士,E-mail:1738876035@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    江苏省科技厅临床医学科技专项基金资助项目(SBL201230169)

Effect of repeated sintering on the color and translucency of dental lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic

 Qian Dongdong, Zhang Lei, Luo Xiaoping, Chen Wenli   

  1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Online:2015-02-01 Published:2015-02-01

摘要:

目的  评价反复烧结对牙科二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷颜色和透光性的影响。方法  制作30个直径10 mm、厚度(1.00±0.01)mm的IPS e.max Press HT A2圆盘试件,随机分为S0、S1、S2、S3、S4、S5共6组(每组5个),分别执行0、1、2、3、4、5次自身上釉程序。使用ShadeEye NCC测色仪测定每组的色彩参数L*、a*、b*,计算色饱和度C*ab及色差ΔE,使用TM-2透射率测试系统测得可见光积分透射比τ。采用SPSS 17.0软件进行方差分析和LSD多重比较。结果  随着烧结次数增加,试件的L*值总体呈减小趋势(P<0.05);a*、 b*、C*ab和τ值均为先增大后减小(P<0.05)。各组和S0组的ΔE最小为0.89,最大为2.01,在临床可接受范围内。结论  反复烧结对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的明度、色相、彩度和透光性均有影响,但色差在临床可接受范围内。

关键词: 反复烧结, 二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷, 颜色, 透光性

Abstract:

Objective  To evaluate the effect of repeated sintering on the color and translucency of dental lithium disilicatebased glass ceramic. Methods  Thirty disc specimens (10 mm in diameter, and 1.00 mm±0.01 mm in thickness) were fabricated using an IPS e.max Press HT A2 ingot and then randomly divided into six groups (S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) (n=5). Each group was sintered 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times individually according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. After polishing, ultrasonic cleaning, and drying, the color parameters (L*, a*, and b* values) and transmittance (τ) of all the specimens were measured using a ShadeEye NCC dental colorimeter and a TM-2 spectrophotometer, respectively. Subsequently, C*ab and ΔE were calculated. The results were statistically analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software for ANOVA and LSD. Results  After repeated sintering, the L* value significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the a*, b*, and C*ab values initially increased and then decreased (P<0.05). The color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) and the C*ab values of group S3 were higher than those of the other groups. The τ values initially increased and then decreased (P<0.05), and these values were optimal when sintered twice. In terms of transmittance (τ), statistical differences existed between the following groups: S0 and S2, S0 and S3, S2 and S5, and S3 and S5 (P<0.05). Compared with group S0, the color differences ΔE were 0.89 minimally and 2.01 maximally after different sintering times, which can be clinically acceptable. Conclusion  Repeated sintering can affect the color and translucency of the IPS e.max Press lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic, but the color difference can be clinically acceptable.

Key words: repeated sintering, lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic, color, translucency