华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

采用分光光度计比较种植支持式氧化锆全瓷和贵金属金瓷修复的牙冠颜色


彭敏1  费伟1   Mandana Hosseini2   Klaus Gotfredsen2   

  1. 1.四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院口腔科,成都 610072;
    2.丹麦哥本哈根大学健康科学院口腔修复系,哥本哈根 2200
  • 出版日期:2014-02-01 发布日期:2014-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 彭敏,副主任医师,硕士,E-mail:oivy@163.com
  • 作者简介:彭敏,副主任医师,硕士,E-mail:oivy@163.com

Crown color match of implant-supported zirconia and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: a spectrophotometric comparison

 Peng Min1, Fei Wei1, Mandana Hosseini2, Klaus Gotfredsen2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Stomatology, People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province and Medical Academy of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610072, China; 2. Dept. of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
  • Online:2014-02-01 Published:2014-02-01

摘要:

目的  应用一种小型分光光度计对上前牙区种植支持式氧化锆全瓷修复与贵金属金瓷修复的牙冠颜色进行比较,为临床选择修复材料提供参考依据。方法  纳入 18例(男 7例,女 11例)行口腔种植修复后复查患者的上前牙区种植支持式单冠 29颗进行研究,其中氧化锆全瓷修复单冠 11颗,贵金属金瓷修复单冠 18颗。采用小型反射型分光光度计型比色仪 SpectroShadeTM采集图片并输入计算机,应用相关软件测量每个种植牙冠体 1/3与对照天然牙的CIE L﹡a﹡b﹡颜色差异。应用统计学软件 SPSS 17.0进行统计分析。结果  氧化锆全瓷修复和贵金属金瓷修复的牙冠明度均高于天然牙,全瓷修复引起的明度差异( 4.5±3.2)大于金瓷修复引起的明度差异( 1.0±2.6),具有统计学意义( P=0.004);色相差异和饱和度差异均无统计学意义。全瓷修复和金瓷修复与天然牙的颜色差异( 7.0±2.8和4.0±1.9)均高于人眼的分辨阈值( 3.7),且前者差异大于后者,具有统计学意义( P=0.002)。氧化锆全瓷和贵金属金瓷两种修复方式的临床主观评分无统计学差异( P=0.977)。上前牙天然牙色由前向后明度渐低,色相变红黄。结论 就本试验所选用的修复材料而言,分光光度计测量显示氧化锆全瓷修复与天然牙的牙冠颜色差异大于贵金属金瓷修复与天然牙的颜色差异,但两种修复方式的临床效果无明显区别。

关键词: 分光光度计, 牙冠颜色, 种植支持式单冠

Abstract:

 Objective  This study aimed to compare the crown color match of implant-supported zirconia restorations and porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations in the anterior maxillary region through spectrophotometric evaluation. Methods Eighteen patients with 29 implant-supported single crowns in the anterior maxillary area were recruited. Eleven of the implant crowns were zirconia restorations and 18 were PFM restorations. Color matching of the implant crown with contra-lateral/ neighboring tooth at the position of body 1/3 of the crown was assessed using a spectrophotometer (SpectroShadeTM) in CIE L﹡a﹡b﹡ coordinates. Subjective crown color match scores were evaluated. Independent sample t test of SPSS 17.0 was used to compare the difference between zirconia restoration and PFM restoration. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the relationship between the spectrophotometric color difference and the subjective crown color match score. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the distribution of color coordinates of natural anterial teeth. Results  The crown color of the implant-supported zirconia restorations and PFM restorations were both lighter than that of natural teeth (ΔL, 4.5±3.2, 1.0±2.6). The lightness difference induced by zirconia restorations was significantly larger than that induced by PFM restorations (P=0.004). The spectrophotometric crown color difference (ΔE) induced by zirconia restorations (7.0±2.8) was significantly larger than that induced byPFM restorations (4.0±1.9) (P=0.002), and both values were beyond the clinical thresholds (3.7). Conclusion  The spectrophotometric crown color difference induced by zirconia restorations was significantly larger than that induced by PFM restorations. However, they were indistinguishable in subjective evaluation.

Key words: spectrophotometric, crown color, implant supported single crowns