华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

正畸求治人群对侧貌面下1/3高度的审美偏好

范明玲  王媛媛  王伟财  周晨  郭丛丛  包柏成   

  1. 中山大学光华口腔医学院•附属口腔医院正畸科,广州 510055
  • 出版日期:2013-08-01 发布日期:2013-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 包柏成,Tel:020-83866394
  • 作者简介:范明玲(1985—),女,越南河内人,硕士
  • 基金资助:

    广东省科技计划基金资助项目(2010B080701068)

Perception of facial profile attractiveness of lower anterior face height in orthodontic treatment seeking people

Pham Minhlinh, Wang Yuanyuan, Wang Weicai, Zhou Chen, Guo Congcong, Bao Baicheng.   

  1. Dept. of Orthodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Online:2013-08-01 Published:2013-08-01

摘要:

目的  调查正畸求治人群对男、女侧貌面下1/3高度的审美偏好。方法  随机选取中山大学光华口腔医学院•附属口腔医院正畸科就诊患者232人为受试者。以模特(男、女各1名)侧貌面中1/3高度恒定、面下1/3高度渐变的系列图片为模型,设计电子问卷。调查受试者感知到的3项指标:1)可以接受的面下1/3与面中1/3高度最小比值(即短容忍边界值)的侧貌,2)可以接受的面下1/3与面中1/3高度最大比值(即长容忍边界值)的侧貌,3)最理想面下1/3与面中1/3高度比值(即理想值)的侧貌。以上述侧貌相对应的面下1/3与面中1/3高度比为试验数据,进行统计分析。结果  正畸求治人群对男、女模面下1/3高度的短容忍边界值中位数为0.8,男模大于女模(P=0.039);长容忍边界值中位数为1.1,男模小于女模(P<0.001);理想值中位数为0.9,男模大于女模(P<0.001)。结论  正畸求治人群对侧貌面下1/3高度存在短容忍边界值、长容忍边界值以及理想值的审美偏好,这对正畸临床具有指导意义。

关键词: 侧貌, 审美, 面下1/3高度

Abstract:

Objective  To evaluate the most acceptable lower anterior face height of male and female by orthodontic treatment seeking people. Methods  Two hundred and thirty-two Chinese orthodontic seeking people of Guanghua Hospital of Stomatology of Sun Yat-sen University were randomly selected in this survey. An electronic questionnaire was designed with a set of male and female young Chinese adult images with changes of the lower anterior face height (while the middle anterior face height remains the same). They were asked about the lowest, highest and optimal proportion(or so-called lower, higher and optimum limits respectively) between the lower anterior face height and the middle anterior face height(LAFH/MAFH) they could accept. All the findings of the proportion were analyzed by a statistic system. Results  The lower limits’median value in regard to the LAFH/MAFH of male model and female model images was 0.8, this limit value for the male model’s was greater than the female model’s(P=0.039); the higher limits’median value was 1.1, this limit value for the male model’s was less than the female model’s(P<0.001); the optimum limits’median value was 0.9, this limit value for the male model’s was greater than the female model’s (P<0.001). Conclusion The result of this study shows all lower, higher and optimal limits accepted by the orthodontic treatment seeking people in regard to the proportion between the lower and middle height of anterior faces. This result will facilitate the understanding of aesthetic judgments of orthodontic patients on profile lower anterior facial height
for orthodontist in treatments.

Key words: profile, aesthetics, lower anterior face height