华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Twin-block矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错的软硬组织变化

李立国1 左艳萍2 袁东辉1   

  1. 1.白求恩国际和平医院口腔科, 河北石家庄050082;2.河北医科大学第一医院口腔正畸科, 河北石家庄050031
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-25 修回日期:2010-12-25 出版日期:2010-12-20 发布日期:2010-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 左艳萍,Tel:0311-85917306
  • 作者简介:李立国(1979—),男,河北人,主治医师,硕士

Hard and soft tissue changes following the treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion using Twin-block appliance

LI Li-guo1, ZUO Yan-ping2, YUAN Dong-hui1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Stomatology, The Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050082, China; 2. Dept. of Orthodontics, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
  • Received:2010-12-25 Revised:2010-12-25 Online:2010-12-20 Published:2010-12-20
  • Contact: ZUO Yan-ping,Tel:0311-85917306

摘要:

目的探索安氏Ⅱ类1分类错畸形在应用Twin-block矫治器治疗后软硬组织侧貌的变化。方法将50例处于生长发育高峰前期或高峰期的安氏Ⅱ类1分类错患者分为2组,治疗组(27例)接受Twin-block矫治器治疗,对照组(23例)不进行治疗,随访观察。对2组治疗(观察)前后的X线头影测量数据进行统计学分析。结果软组织指标中治疗组Ls-E、Li-E、U1-Stms、Stms-Stmi、NsLs-FH、LsNsLi、LsNsPg’、H角减小;Sn-Stms、Stmi-Me’、Ns-Me’、Sn-Me’、NsLi-FH、NsPg’-FH、A’Ls-FH、B’Li-FH、LiB’Pg’、CmSnLs、GSnPg’、Z角增大,与对照组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。硬组织指标中治疗组SNB、L1-NB、IMPA增大;ANB、U1-SN、U1-NA、FMIA减小,与对照组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论Twin-block矫治器可显著改善下颌后缩患者上下颌骨的矢状关系,促进面下1/3高度的生长,使软组织侧貌趋于直面型。

关键词: Twin-block矫治器, 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错, 软组织侧貌, 功能矫治

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the hard and soft tissue changes following the treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion using Twin-block appliance. Methods 50 Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion subjects whose handwrist radiographs were in FG-G stage were selected. One group(27 patients) was treated with Twin-block appliance, the other group(23 patients) was observed without treatment. The acquired data of cephalometric of two groups were analyzed statistically with SPSS 11.0. Results Soft tissue changes, Ls-E, Li-E, U1-Stms, Stms-Stmi, NsLs-FH, LsNsLi, LsNsPg’, the angle of H decreased. Sn-Stms, Stmi-Me’, Ns-Me’, Sn-Me’, NsLi-FH, NsPg’-FH, A’Ls-FH, B’Li- FH, LiB’Pg’, CmSnLs, GSnPg’, the angle of Z increased, there was statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Hard tissue changes, SNB, L1-NB, IMPA increased, ANB, U1-SN, U1-NA, FMIA decreased, there was statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion Sagittal relationship between upper- and lower-jaws is effectively improved after orthopedics with Twin-block appliance. Lower face height increases. Soft tissue profile tends to be straight-styled.

Key words: Twin-block appliance, Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, soft tissue profile, functional treatment