华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 414-416.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2012.04.021

• 专栏论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

漂白剂对玻璃离子水门汀类材料充填Ⅴ类洞边缘微渗漏的影响

唐健霞 冯云枝   

  1. 中南大学湘雅二医院口腔中心, 长沙410011
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-17 修回日期:2012-01-08 出版日期:2012-08-01 发布日期:2012-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 冯云枝,Tel:0731-85295055
  • 作者简介:唐健霞(1985—),女,湖南人,硕士
  • 基金资助:

    湖南省科委基金资助项目(06JJ4125);中南大学基本科研业务费重点基金资助项目(2010DXPY012)

Effects of bleaching agents on the microleakage of class Ⅴ cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements

Tang Jianxia, Feng Yunzhi.   

  1. Dept. of Stomotology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
  • Received:2011-08-17 Revised:2012-01-08 Online:2012-08-01 Published:2012-08-01

摘要:

目的评估漂白凝胶和洁白牙贴对3种不同的玻璃离子水门汀类材料边缘微渗漏的影响。方法在45颗离体健康前磨牙的颊舌侧制备Ⅴ类洞,随机分为A、B、C组,分别使用加强型玻璃离子水门汀KetacTM Molar Easymix、复合体F2000、复合体Dyract AP充填,每个大组再分为3个亚组,第1组和第2组分别使用质量分数14%过氧化氢(HP)洁白牙贴和10%过氧化脲(CP)凝胶进行漂白,第3组为对照组。所有样本置入37 ℃蒸馏水中保存7 d后冷热循环500次,然后进行漂白。漂白21 d后置于碱性品红溶液中染色24 h,沿牙体长轴通过充填体中央颊舌向剖开牙齿,体视显微镜下观察并测量染料渗入窝洞壁的深度。结果2种漂白方式对充填体边缘微渗漏的影响没有明显差异(P>0.05);与对照组相比,2种漂白方式对B、C组的微渗漏均没有产生明显影响(P>0.05),但均可使A组的微渗漏增加(P<0.05)。结论10%CP凝胶和14%HP洁白牙贴对充填体边缘微渗漏的影响无明显差异;漂白不会影响复合体的微渗漏,但会增加加强型玻璃离子水门汀的微渗漏。

关键词: 漂白, 过氧化脲, 过氧化氢, 微渗漏

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effects of a bleaching gel and a whitening strip on the microleakage of three different glass-ionomer cements. Methods Forty-five freshly extracted human premolars were used and class Ⅴ cavity was prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces. The teeth were randomly assigned to A, B and C groups and restored as follows: Conventional strengthen glass-ionomer cement(KetacTM Molar Easymix), compomer(F2000) and compomer (Dyract AP). Teeth were kept in distilled water at 37 ℃ for 7 days. Then the specimens were thermocycled for 500 times. Each group was randomly divided into 3 subgroups which were treated for 21 days with one of the following: Whitening strip(14% hydrogen peroxide), bleaching gel(10% carbamide peroxide), or distilled water(control). After bleaching, the teeth were placed in a solution of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours, then the teeth were sectioned longitudinally to evaluate the dye penetration. The depth of staining along the tooth restoration interface was recorded with a stereomicroscope. Results There were no signicant differences between the two bleaching agents in microleakage of restorations(P>0.05). The two bleaching agents did not significantly affect the microleakage of compomer(P>0.05), whereas the microleakage of glass-ionomer cement in the experimental groups was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion There are no significant differences in microleakage of restorations between bleaching gel(10%carbamide peroxide) and whitening strip(14% hydrogen peroxide). The two bleaching agents do not significantly affect the microleakage of compomer but adversely affect the microleakage of strengthen glass-ionomer cement.

Key words: bleaching, carbamide peroxide, hydrogen peroxide, microleakage