West China Journal of Stomatology

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of zoledronate on the osteoclast adhesion and gene expression of integrin αv and β3

Lin Jueshan1, Dong Wei1, Xu Chunfeng1, Sun Hong2, Feng Xiaojie1, Qi Mengchun1.   

  1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Stomatology, Hebei United University, Tangshan 063000, China; 2. Dept. of Pathology, College of Basic Medicine, Hebei United University, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Online:2014-12-01 Published:2014-12-01

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of zoledronate (ZOL) on the osteoclast adhesion and expression of integrin αvand β3 in vitro. Methods Mice RAW264.7 cells were used for osteoclast differentiation in vitro, and osteoclastogenesis was examined by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and dentin resorption lacunae examination. The cells were then divided into 2 groups, the control group and ZOL treatment group (treated with 1×10-6 mol·L-1 ZOL for 2 d). The adhesion ability of osteoclasts and mRNA and the protein expressions of integrin αvand β3were examined by crystal violet staining, real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blot analysis, and immunofluorescent chemistry. Results TRAP staining and dentin resorption lacunae examination revealed the formation of multi-nuclear osteoclasts. ZOL treatment significantly decreased the adhesion ability of osteoclasts (P<0.01). In the ZOL-treated group, the mRNA levels of integrin αvand β3 were 0.66±0.05 and 0.59±0.08, respectively. In the control group, the mRNA levels of integrin αv and β3were 1.01±0.01 and 1.01±0.02, respectively; these values were higher than those in the ZOL-treated group (P<0.01). The protein level of integrin αvand β3in the ZOL-treated group (31 934.84±112.91 and 18 812.79±194.13) was downregulated by approximately 39.19% and 40.17%, respectively, compared with those in the control group (52 517.81±211.72 and 31 441.93±456.87) (P<0.01). Immunofluorescent examination showed that the fluorescent intensities of integrinαv and β3 in the ZOL-treated group (9.491±0.748 and 4.744±0.759) were also significantly decreased compared with those in the control group (15.159±1.143 and 11.418±1.095) (P<0.01). Conclusion ZOL significantly inhibits osteoclast adhesion and downregulates integrin αvand β3expression, thus contributing to the ZOL-induced inhibition of osteoclastmediated bone resorption.

Key words: zoledronate, osteoclast, cell adhesion, integrin αv and β3, sealing zone