美学区种植体植入轴向的影响因素及临床决策

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023151

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 512-520.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023151

美学区种植体植入轴向的影响因素及临床决策

刘雨婷(), 袁泉()

口腔疾病防治全国重点实验室国家口腔医学中心国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院，成都 610041

收稿日期:2023-05-19 修回日期:2023-06-25 出版日期:2023-10-01 发布日期:2023-10-08
通讯作者: 袁泉 E-mail:Aliceyutingl@163.com;yuanquan@scu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘雨婷，主治医师，博士，E-mail：Aliceyutingl@163.com|袁泉，四川大学华西口腔医院主任医师、教授、博士生导师，口腔修复学系主任。日本广岛大学联合培养口腔医学博士，美国哈佛大学牙学院博士后，加州大学洛杉矶分校访问学者。担任国际牙科研究会（IADR）种植研究分会主席，国际牙医师学院（ICD）fellow，国际牙种植学会（ITI）fellow，中国医师协会口腔医师分会口腔种植工作委员会副主任委员，中华口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会常务委员，四川省口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会候任主任委员。入选国家高层次人才计划科技创新领军人才，四川省学术和技术带头人等。获国家自然科学基金委杰出青年基金和优秀青年基金等项目资助，发表第一/通讯作者论文50余篇，参编《口腔种植学》和《口腔修复学》规划教材和专著10部。

Clinical decision and related factors influencing implant direction in the esthetic area

Liu Yuting(), Yuan Quan.()

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2023-05-19 Revised:2023-06-25 Online:2023-10-01 Published:2023-10-08
Contact: Yuan Quan. E-mail:Aliceyutingl@163.com;yuanquan@scu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

美学区种植治疗的目标在于长期稳定的骨结合和理想美学效果。除了种植体植入的理想三维位置，良好的种植体轴向亦是保证美学区种植治疗成功的关键因素。由于上颌前牙区特殊的解剖结构，医生在种植手术时常需要综合考量剩余牙槽骨骨量及形态、软组织特征、修复方式和患者需求等多种因素，从而确定种植体植入的轴向。本文综述了前牙美学区种植体植入轴向的影响因素，并分析了理想修复体长轴与牙槽骨的矢状位置关系，以期为美学区种植决策的制定提供参考。

关键词: 美学区种植, 以修复为导向的种植, 牙槽骨轴向, 种植轴向

Abstract:

Implant treatment in the esthetic area requires stable osseointegration and successful esthetic outcomes. Achieving this goal requires careful consideration of accurate implant axis and ideal three-dimensional position. Owing to the high esthetics and the special anatomical structure of the maxillary, a successful implant means a synthesized deli-beration of the residual bone dimensions, soft-tissue thickness, and the relationship of the residual alveolar ridge with the planned restoration. This article offers an in-depth analysis of the clinical decisions and key factors affecting the implant direction in the esthetic area.

Key words: implant in the esthetic area, prosthetic-driven implantology, direction of alveolar bone, implant direction

中图分类号:

R 783.4

刘雨婷, 袁泉. 美学区种植体植入轴向的影响因素及临床决策[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 512-520.

Liu Yuting, Yuan Quan.. Clinical decision and related factors influencing implant direction in the esthetic area[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 41(5): 512-520.

图/表 6

图 1

图 2

图 3

图 4

图 5

图 6

参考文献 50

1	Lim HC, Kang DU, Baek H, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of the alveolar ridge profile and virtual implant placement for the anterior maxilla[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2019, 49(5): 299-309.
2	Tsigarida A, Toscano J, de Brito Bezerra B, et al. Buccal bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(11): 1326-1343.
3	Omori Y, Lang NP, Botticelli D, et al. Biological and mechanical complications of angulated abutments connec-ted to fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2020, 47(1): 101-111.
4	Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant pla-cement with restoration-generated site development[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1995, 16(8): 796, 798-802, 804.
5	Zhou Y, Si M, Liu Y, et al. Likelihood of needing facial bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla of Chinese Asians: a cone beam computed tomography virtual implant study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(3): 503-509.
6	Wu Q, Yang B, Gao S, et al. Apical U-shape splitting technique for undercut areas of the anterior alveolar ri-dge: a prospective non-randomized controlled study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 48(3): 388-394.
7	Casar-Espinosa JC, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Serrera-Figallo MÁ, et al. Combination of straight and tilted implants for supporting screw-retained dental prostheses in atrophic posterior maxillae: a 2-year prospective study[J]. J Dent, 2017, 63: 85-93.
8	Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann J, García-Gil I, Pedregal P, et al. Long-term clinical behavior and complications of intentionally tilted dental implants compared with straight implants supporting fixed restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Biology (Basel), 2021, 10(6): 509.
9	宫苹. 牙缺失种植修复并发症与咬合[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018, 53(12): 800-804.
	Gong P. Role of occlusion in complications of implant rehabilitation[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2018, 53(12): 800-804.
10	Ramanauskaite A, Sader R. Esthetic complications in implant dentistry[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2022, 88(1): 73-85.
11	Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19 Suppl: 43-61.
12	Buser D, Belser U, Wismeijer D.Implant therapy in the esthetic zone: single tooth replacements. The ITI treatment guide volume 1[M]. Berlin: Quintessence Publi-shing, 2007.
13	Rojas-Vizcaya F. Biological aspects as a rule for single implant placement. The 3A-2B rule: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22(7): 575-580.
14	Testori T, Weinstein T, Scutellà F, et al. Implant placement in the esthetic area: criteria for positioning single and multiple implants[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1): 176-196.
15	Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 27(6): 1514-1519.
16	刘慧凤, 黄盛兴, 石磊, 等. 基于锥形束CT的上颌前牙区解剖形态学研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2015, 23(6): 306-310.
	Liu HF, Huang SX, Shi L, et al. Anatomical morphology of maxillary anterior teeth—a study using cone beam computed tomography[J]. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis, 2015, 23(6): 306-310.
17	陶荣, 蒙萌, 牛丽娜, 等. 300名正常上前牙牙根与牙槽窝位置关系的锥形束CT分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2017, 52(10): 631-636.
	Tao R, Meng M, Niu LN, et al. Investigation of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary alveolar bone: a cone-beam CT study in 300 cases with normal occlusion[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2017, 52(10): 631-636.
18	Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(1): 73-80.
19	Le BT, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Pluemsakunthai W. Is buc-colingual angulation of maxillary anterior implants associated with the crestal labial soft tissue thickness[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 43(7): 874-878.
20	Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Tözüm TF, et al. Into the paradigm of local factors as contributors for peri-implant disease: short communication[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016, 31(2): 288-292.
21	Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, et al. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent Res, 2014, 93(10): 950-958.
22	Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Majzoub J, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation: complications and cost-effectiveness[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2022. doi: 10.1111/prd.12469 .
23	Slagter KW, Meijer HJA, Hentenaar DFM, et al. Immediate single-tooth implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation in bony defect sites in the esthetic region: a 5-year randomized controlled trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(12): 1738-1748.
24	Esfahrood ZR, Kadkhodazadeh M, Talebi Ardakani MR. Gingival biotype: a review[J]. Gen Dent, 2013, 61(4): 14-17.
25	Fischer KR, Künzlberger A, Donos N, et al. Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(1): 443-448.
26	Lee SA, Kim AC, Prusa LA, et al. Characterization of dental anatomy and gingival biotype in Asian populations[J]. J Calif Dent Assoc, 2013, 41(1): 31-39.
27	Lee WZ, Ong MMA, Yeo AB. Gingival profiles in a select Asian cohort: a pilot study[J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2018. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12269 .
28	Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, et al. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2007, 27(3): 251-257.
29	Zucchelli G, Sharma P, Mounssif I. Esthetics in perio-dontics and implantology[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1): 7-18.
30	杜巧琳, 顾新华. 牙种植体形态结构设计的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(5): 475-480.
	Du QL, Gu XH. Progress of research on the morphological and structural design of dental implants[J]. Stomato-logy, 2021, 41(5): 475-480.
31	林野. 当代牙种植体设计进步与临床意义[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 18-28.
	Lin Y. Current dental implant design and its clinical importance[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2017, 35(1): 18-28.
32	Karl M, Irastorza-Landa A. Does implant design affect primary stability in extraction sites[J]. Quintessence Int, 2017, 48(3): 219-224.
33	宿玉成. 口腔种植学[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014.
	Su YC. Implant dentistry[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2014.
34	Rajan M, Gunaseelan R. Fabrication of a cement-and sc-rew-retained implant prosthesis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2004, 92(6): 578-580.
35	Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP, et al. Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 73(1): 141-151.
36	Lim G, Lin GH, Monje A, et al. Wound healing complications following guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(1): 41-50.
37	Tay JRH, Lu XJ, Lai WMC, et al. Clinical and histological sequelae of surgical complications in horizontal guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and proposal for management[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1): 76.
38	Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fe-nestrations: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(): 113-123.
39	Urban IA, Monje A. Guided bone regeneration in alveolar bone reconstruction[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2019, 31(2): 331-338.
40	Sato D, Kanazawa M, Kim YK, et al. Immediate loading of two freestanding implants placed by computer-guided flapless surgery supporting a mandibular overdenture wi-th magnetic attachments[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2016, 60(1): 54-62.
41	D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 73(1): 121-133.
42	Aydemir CA, Arısan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand me-thod: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(3): 255-263.
43	Wismeijer D. Ridge augmentation procedures in implant patients. The ITI treatment guide volume 7[M]. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing, 2013.
44	Benic GI, Hämmerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014, 66(1): 13-40.
45	Lau SL, Chow J, Li W, et al. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(1): 142-153.
46	Chiapasco M, Casentini P. Horizontal bone-augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: prosthetically gui-ded regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1): 213-240.
47	Gluckman H, Pontes CC, Du Toit J. Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: a CBCT classification for immediate implant placement[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 120(1): 50-56.
48	杨刚, 胡文杰, 曹洁, 等. 汉族青年人上颌前牙牙根位置及牙槽骨厚度的测量分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2013, 48(12): 716-720.
	Yang G, Hu WJ, Cao J, et al. Measurement and analysis of maxillary anterior tooth root position and alveolar bone thickness in Han youth people[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2013, 48(12): 716-720.
49	Andre A, Ogle OE. Vertical and horizontal augmentation of deficient maxilla and mandible for implant placement[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2021, 65(1): 103-123.
50	Plonka AB, Urban IA, Wang HL. Decision tree for vertical ridge augmentation[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2018, 38(2): 269-275.

美学区种植体植入轴向的影响因素及临床决策

Clinical decision and related factors influencing implant direction in the esthetic area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 50

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价