华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 129-136.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2026.2025174

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种含氟涂料对低龄儿童龋病社区干预的效果与成本分析

杨朝青1,2(), 余锦梅1(), 张艺山1, 刘芳宏1, 庞秋玲1, 谢羽璐1, 冉翎杉1, 邱荣敏1()   

  1. 1.广西医科大学口腔医学院/附属口腔医院,广西口腔颌面修复与重建研究自治区级重点实验室,广西颅颌面畸形临床医学研究中心,广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会 口腔感染性疾病防治重点实验室,南宁 530021
    2.河池市人民医院口腔科,河池 547000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-20 出版日期:2026-02-01 发布日期:2026-02-02
  • 通讯作者: 邱荣敏 E-mail:646280966@qq.com;1105385097@qq.com;9056732@qq.com
  • 作者简介:杨朝青,主治医师,硕士,E-mail:646280966@qq.com|余锦梅,硕士,E-mail:1105385097@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西科技厅重点研发项目(AB22035015);广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目(S2020041);广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目(S2024121);南宁市青秀区科技计划项目-重点研发计划(2020039);广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会科研项目(Z-M20251725)

Efficacy and cost analysis of two fluoride varnishes in community-based interventions for early childhood caries

Yang Chaoqing1,2(), Yu Jinmei1(), Zhang Yishan1, Liu Fanghong1, Pang Qiuling1, Xie Yulu1, Ran Lingshan1, Qiu Rongmin1()   

  1. 1.College & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Key Laboratory of the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction for Oral and Maxillofacial Research, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Craniofacial Deformity, Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment for Oral Infectious Diseases, Nanning 530021, China
    2.Dept. of Stomatology, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi 547000, China
  • Received:2025-04-20 Online:2026-02-01 Published:2026-02-02
  • Contact: Qiu Rongmin E-mail:646280966@qq.com;1105385097@qq.com;9056732@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Project of Guangxi Science and Technology Department(AB22035015);Guangxi Medical and Health Appropriate Technology Development and Promotion and Application Project(S2020041);Key Research and Development Program of Science and Technology Plan Project of Qingxiu District, Nanning(2020039);Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Z-M20251725)

摘要:

目的 基于社区干预模式,探讨爱睿康与多乐氟对低龄儿童乳牙龋病的预防效果及经济学效益。 方法 选取河池市宜州区儿童纳入研究并随机分为2组,爱睿康组和多乐氟组。分别使用相应含氟涂料,每6个月进行口腔健康教育+局部涂氟。1.5年后对比2组儿童干预前后龋病发生和成本支出情况,采用成本最小化分析法对二者的经济效益进行比较,通过敏感性分析来探讨模型中主要参数变化对研究结果稳定性的影响及量化分析2种含氟涂料在同等防龋效果下的成本优势概率差异。 结果 干预前2组间患龋率及龋均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预1.5年后2组间患龋率及龋均差异仍无统计学意义(P>0.05),龋病发病率和新增龋均差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组新增龋均差异的单侧97.5%CI均低于非劣效界值,非劣效性结论成立(P<0.025)。成本最小化分析结果显示,爱睿康组总成本(25 411.44元)低于多乐氟组(26 692.98元)。单因素敏感性分析中发现影响总成本的最主要参数是两者材料价格。通过1 000次的蒙特卡罗模拟分析发现爱睿康组的总体费用低于多乐氟组的概率达到73.1%。

关键词: 低龄儿童龋, 含氟涂料, 社区干预, 成本最小化分析

Abstract:

Objective A community intervention mo-del was used to investigate the preventive effects and cost-effectiveness of I-ReHealth® and Duraphat® in early childhood caries. Methods Children from Yizhou District, Hechi City, were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: the I-ReHealth® group and the Duraphat® group. Each group received topical fluoride varnish applications and dental health education every 6 months. After 1.5 years, the incidence of caries and associated costs were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Cost minimization analysis was employed to evaluate economic efficiency, and sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of variations in key parameters on result stability and to quantify the probabilistic differences in cost benefits between the two fluoride varnishes under equivalent caries-preventive effects. Results Prior to the intervention, we found no statistically significant differences in caries prevalence or mean dmft scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After 1.5 years of treatment, both groups still showed no statistically significant differences in caries prevalence (P>0.05), mean dmft scores (P>0.05), caries incidence rate (P>0.05), or increment in mean dmft (P>0.05). The one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the difference in mean dmft increment was below the non-inferiority threshold, confirming non-inferiority (P<0.025). Cost minimization analysis revealed lower total costs in the I-ReHealth® group (¥25 411.44) than in the Duraphat® group (¥26 692.98). One-way sensitivity analysis identified material price as the most influential parameter affecting total costs. Monte Carlo simulation with 1 000 iterations demonstrated a 73.1% probability that the I-ReHealth® group will yield cost savings compared with the Duraphat® group. Conclusion I-ReHealth® is non-inferior to Duraphat® in caries-preventive efficacy but superior in cost-effectiveness in reducing patient expenses.

Key words: early childhood caries, fluoride varnish, community-based intervention, cost minimization analysis

中图分类号: