华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用自体下颌骨外板行颅面部贴附植骨的临床研究

赵延峰1, 刘筱菁2, 陆平1, 周晓南1, 归来3   

  1. 大连市中心医院颌面外科;北京大学口腔医院颌面外科;中国医学科学院整形外科医院颅颌面外科;
  • 收稿日期:2008-12-25 修回日期:2008-12-25 出版日期:2008-12-20 发布日期:2008-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 归来,Tel:010-88772004
  • 作者简介:赵延峰(1974-),男,山东人,主治医师,博士

Clinical research of craniofacial bone autograft using mandibular outer cortex

ZHAO Yan-feng1, LIU Xiaojing2, LU Ping1, ZHOU Xiao-nan1, GUI Lai3   

  1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dalian City Central Hospital, Dalian 116033, China; 2. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing 100081, China; 3. Dept. of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100041, China
  • Received:2008-12-25 Revised:2008-12-25 Online:2008-12-20 Published:2008-12-20
  • Contact: GUI Lai,Tel:010-88772004

摘要:

目的探讨应用自体下颌骨外板行颅面部不同部位贴附植骨后的体积变化情况。方法选择6例采用自体下颌骨外板同时行下颌角及部分体部(角体部)、上颌前部的贴附植骨患者为研究对象,采集患者术后即刻、术后半年的CT数据,利用三维CT分体重建和数据配准分割技术,对配准后的下颌角体部及上颌前部2个植骨区域的术后即刻与术后半年的2组数据同时进行分割,分别独立出2个下颌骨外板贴附植骨区域,对移植骨体积的变化进行测量分析。结果下颌骨外板贴附移植于下颌角体部,术后半年体积缩小20.8%±7.2%,差值分析显示吸收的主要部位为靠近下颌骨下缘及后缘;移植于上颌前部者体积缩小11.2%±2.3%。2个部位移植骨体积吸收率有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论下颌骨外板贴附移植于颅面部不同部位,骨吸收的程度不同,受区局部力学环境的差异可能是影响因素之一;对吸收率的量化可更好地指导临床应用。

关键词: 下颌骨外板, 贴附植骨, 三维CT, 颅颌面外科

Abstract:

Objective To illustrate the volume changes of mandibular outer cortex after been grafted to different recipient sites of facies cranii. Methods Six cases underwent onlay bone graft to the angle and body part of  mandible and malar surface simultaneously by using mandibular outer cortex. Three dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) datum of immediate postoperative and 6 months postoperative of each case were collected systematically. By true-up and dissection techniques based on 3D-CT, volume changes of bone graft at different recipient sites were observed and analyzed 6 months postoperative. Results 6 months after onlay bone grafted, bone resorption occurred. To different recipient sites, bone resorption rate was unequal. At the mandible area, bone resorption rate was 20.8%± 7.2%, the main site of resorption was at the lower and posterior border of mandible. At the anterior part of maxilla, bone resorption rate was 11.2%±2.3%. Statistics showed significant difference of resorption rate between the two sites (P<0.05). Conclusion Bone resorption of mandibular outer cortex after onlay graft treatment is variant according to different craniofacial recipient sites. The difference of mechanical environment at variant recipient sites is considered to be an influencing factor. Quantization of bone resorption rate can guide a better clinical use.

Key words: mandibular outer cortex, onlay bone graft, three dimensional computed tomography, craniomaxillofacial surgery