华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同错类型患者下前牙区牙槽厚度测量的研究

李佳岭1, 2, 李小兵2, 李佳园3, 乔鞠2, 彭明慧2, 钱煦2   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院正畸科;四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科;四川大学华西公共卫生学院流行病学教研室;四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科;
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-25 修回日期:2008-08-25 出版日期:2008-08-20 发布日期:2008-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 李小兵, Tel:028- 85501425
  • 作者简介:李佳岭(1980-),女,四川人,硕士

Study of mandibular anter ior alveolar bone thickness in subjects with differ ent facial skeletal types LI Jialing1,2, LI Xiao- bing2, LI Jia- yuan3, QIAO Ju2, PENG Ming- hui2, QIAN Xu2.

LI Jialing1,2, LI Xiao- bing2, LI Jia- yuan3, QIAO Ju2, PENG Ming- hui2, QIAN Xu2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Orthodontics, The Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China; 2. Dept. of Orthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 3. Dept. of Epidemiology, West China College of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2008-08-25 Revised:2008-08-25 Online:2008-08-20 Published:2008-08-20
  • Contact: LI Xiao- bing, Tel:028- 85501425

摘要:

的研究不同错类型患者下前牙区牙厚度与垂直骨面型和矢状骨面型的关系。方法选取恒牙列初期错畸形患者168例,其中男性93例,女性75例。根据垂直骨面型和矢状骨面型将患者分为9组,对其X线头影侧位片上的下前牙槽根尖区牙槽厚度进行测量,并采用SPSS 13.0统计软件对测量结果进行方差分析和两两比较。结果不同垂直骨面型患者下前牙区牙槽厚度的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),低角组厚度最大,其次为均角组,高角组最小。高角组下前牙槽根尖区牙槽较窄,低角组较厚。在高角、均角、低角各组内部,骨性Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类患者牙槽厚度的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。均角Ⅲ类患者下前牙区牙槽厚度较小,与高角Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类患者牙槽厚度的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);低角Ⅲ类患者与均角Ⅰ、Ⅱ类患者牙槽厚度的差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论下前牙区牙槽厚度与垂直骨面型密切相关,与矢状骨面型关系不明显。

关键词: 牙槽厚度, 垂直骨面型, 矢状骨面型, 头影测量

Abstract:

alveolar bone thickness. Methods Among 168 cases with malocclusion in early permanent dentition stage, 93 patients were male and 75 patients were female. All patients(aged 10 - 14 years) were divided into 9 groups by different facial skeletal types, mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness in patients′lateral cephalometric films were measured. ANOVA were performed to measurement results with the SPSS 13.0 statistical software. Results Though sagittal facial skeletal types were the same, there were significant differences between different vertical facial types groups. The order was low- angle group, average- angle group and high- angle group according to the size. A high- angle individual often had a thin anterior alveolar bone while a low- angle individual often had the oppositemorphology character. There was no statistical significance between skeletal type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ. But group of skeletal type Ⅲ also had a thin alveolar bone thickness which had no significant difference with high- angle group. Lowangle group Ⅲ had no significant difference with average- angle groupⅠ and Ⅱ in alveolar bone thickness. Conclusion Sagittal facial skeletal types have little influence on anterior alveolar morphology, but the vertical facial skeletal types have strong connection with anterior alveolar bone thickness.

Key words: terior alveolar thickness, vertical facial skeletal type, sagittal facial skeletal type, cephalometry