华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

活动式前牵引矫治器口内固位装置改进的临床研究

张慧1, 刘钧2, 范晓枫2, 赵青2, 张景慧1, 赵志河2   

  1. 1.内蒙古医学院第三附属医院口腔正畸科, 内蒙古包头014010; 2.四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科, 四川成都610041
  • 收稿日期:2008-06-25 修回日期:2008-06-25 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2008-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 赵志河,Tel:028- 85503645
  • 作者简介:张慧(1973-),女,内蒙古人,主治医师,学士

Modified r etention elements of r emovable r ever se headgear appliances

ZHANG Hui1, LIU Jun2, FAN Xiaofeng2, ZHAO Qing2, ZHANG Jing- hui1, ZHAO Zhi- he2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Orthodontics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Neimenggu Medical College, Baotou 014010, China; 2. Dept. of Orthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2008-06-25 Revised:2008-06-25 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2008-06-20
  • Contact: ZHAO Zhi- he,Tel:028- 85503645

摘要:

目的探讨活动式前牵引矫治器口内固位装置改进后治疗骨性Ⅲ类错的临床效果。方法选择18例需行前牵引的替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错患者为研究对象,将18例患者随机分为传统组(T组)和改良组(M组),每组9例。根据分组,固位方式分别选择传统型活动式前牵引矫治器和改良型活动式前牵引矫治器。改良型活动式前牵引矫治器在传统型矫治器基础上,在上颌中切牙间加做箭头卡固位。分别在患者初次佩戴和第1次复诊时使用2个相同的弹簧测力计测定2种前牵引矫治器的最小脱位力,并在矫治初始3个月记录每次复诊时患者的牵引后脱位情况。结果初次佩戴和第1次复诊时M组与T组的最小脱位力之间均有统计学差异(P<0.01,P<0.001),改良型活动式前牵引矫治器的最小脱位力明显大于传统型活动式前牵引矫治器。矫治初始3个月内M组脱位2次,T组脱位9次,两组之间有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论在传统型活动式前牵引矫治器上加做上颌中切牙间箭头卡,可以有效避免牵引加力过程中矫治器向下脱位,提高了前牵引矫治器的治疗效果。

关键词: 前牵引矫治器, 固位, 箭头卡

Abstract:

Objective Retention elements were added in the removable reverse headgear appliances in order to achieve better treatment effects of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion. Methods Eighteen patients who needed treatments with reverse headgear appliances were randomly and equally divided into two groups with traditional type of retention elements(T group) and modified type of retention elements(M group) respectively. For the modified type appliances, an adams clasp was added in the position of central incisors on the basis of the traditional type. The minimum dislocating force for both types was measured with the same forcemeter in the first and second visit, respectively. The occurrence of dislocation caused by traction was recorded during the visits of the first three months. Results The M group showed significantly greater retention than the T group. The minimum dislocating force for M group was larger in the first and second visit (P<0.01, P<0.001). Furthermore, during the first three months, two times of dislocation occurred in M group while it was nine times for T group, indicating great difference in retention (P<0.05). Conclusion Adding an adams clasp in the position of upper central incisors could effectively prevent the downward dislocation of the appliance when traction force was applied. Accordingly, the therapeutic efficacy was greatly improved.

Key words: reverse headgear appliance, retention, adams clasp