华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙科乳光瓷透射参数的测量与比较

姚江武1, 李水根2, 林昌健3   

  1. 1.厦门市口腔医院口腔修复科, 福建厦门361003; 2.福建医科大学口腔医院修复科, 福建福州350002; 3.厦门大学固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室, 福建厦门361005
  • 收稿日期:2008-06-25 修回日期:2008-06-25 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2008-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 姚江武,Tel:0592- 2100928
  • 作者简介:姚江武(1956-),男,福建人,教授,硕士

Evaluation of thr ee tr ansmission par ameter s of dental opal por celains and the cor r elations among par ameters

YAO Jiang- wu1, LI Shui- gen2, LIN Chang- jian3   

  1. 1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Xiamen Dental Hospital, Xiamen 361003, China; 2. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Stomatology College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Received:2008-06-25 Revised:2008-06-25 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2008-06-20
  • Contact: YAO Jiang- wu,Tel:0592- 2100928

摘要:

目的测量Ceramco、Shofu、Noritake和Vita等4个品牌22种不同颜色的乳光瓷样本的透明度、对比率和遮色效果3个透射参数,并比较其相关性,为正确选择及使用乳光瓷粉提供参考。方法在反射模式和不同背景下,采用分光光谱仪测量乳光瓷样本的L*、a*、b*值,计算色差、透明度参数(TP)和遮色效果(ME)。在400~750 nm光谱范围内测量样本的光反射率,计算对比率(CR)。TP、ME和CR等3个透射参数分别按品牌和颜色因素用完全随机设计的方差分析进行分析,组间比较用SNK- q检验(α=0.05);3个参数的相关性分析采用直线相关与回归分析和多元线性回归分析(α=0.05)。结果相同品牌不同颜色乳光瓷透射参数的均数总体不等或不全相等(P<0.05)。遮色效果与透明度参数、对比率与透明度参数、遮色效果与对比率的相关性都具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。透明度参数与其他参数的多元线性回归具有统计学意义(P<0.05),偏回归系数都有统计学意义(P<0.05),对比率对透明度参数的回归所起的作用最大。结论使用乳光瓷粉时,应根据其透射参数加以选择;对比率代表不透明度,反映乳光瓷的不透明特性,较遮色效果更具有代表性。

关键词: 乳光瓷, 分光光谱仪, 透明度参数, 对比率, 遮色效果

Abstract:

Objective To measure the translucency parameter(TP), masking effect(ME), and contrast ratio(CR) of opal porcelain of Ceramco, Shofu, Noritake, and Vita, and to compare the correlations among the three transmission parameters, in order to provide reference for selecting opal porcelain correctly. Methods The color of specimens was measured according to CIE L*a*b* under different background and reflectance mode with a Color- Eye 7000A spectrophotometer. The color difference, TP, and ME value were calculated. Within 400- 750 nm spectra, the ratio of light reflectance was measured, and CR was also calculated. The data was compared by ANOVA and SNK- q test (α=0.05). The correlation and multiple linear regression between TP, CR, and ME were analyzed(α=0.05). Results There were statistical difference with different shade of the same brands (P<0.05). The correlations between ME and TP, TP and CR, ME and CR were existed(P<0.05). TP was correlated not only with ME but also with CR based on multiple regression analysis(P<0.05). The partial correlation coefficients were statistically significant(P<0.05). CR was the main devotion to translucency parameter on multiple regressions. Conclusion It is recommended to select opal porcelains based on transmission parameters. CR value has an inner significance of opaque property of opal porcelain and can express opacity property of opal porcelain more appropriately than ME.

Key words: opal porcelains, spectrophotometer, translucency parameter, contrast ratio, masking effect