华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

调拌方法对磷酸锌黏固剂材料抗压强度的影响

李灏来1, 刘丹2, 毕小琴2, 李晓英1, 陈文1, 赵晓曦1, 杨锦波1   

  1. 1.四川大学华西口腔医院牙体牙髓病科; 2.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室, 四川大学, 四川成都610041
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-25 修回日期:2008-04-25 出版日期:2008-04-20 发布日期:2008-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨锦波,Tel:028- 61153049
  • 作者简介:李灏来(1973-),女,四川人,副主任护师,学士
  • 基金资助:

    四川省卫生厅科研基金资助项目(060031)

Influence of hand - mixed methods on compr essive str ength of zinc phosphate dental cement

LI Hao- lai1, LIU Dan2, BI Xiao- qin2, LI Xiao- ying1, CHEN Wen1, ZHAO Xiao- xi1, YANG Jin- bo1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2008-04-25 Revised:2008-04-25 Online:2008-04-20 Published:2008-04-20
  • Contact: YANG Jin- bo,Tel:028- 61153049

摘要:

目的研究不同调拌方法对磷酸锌黏固剂材料抗压强度的影响。方法选择3名护士在环境温度和湿度,调拌比例、时间、频率均相同并使用同一调拌用具的条件下,分别用单向旋转法、正反双向交替旋转法和上下提拉折叠法3种临床常用的调拌方法调拌磷酸锌黏固剂,调拌后装入高10 mm、内径5 mm的塑料圆柱形模具内,待凝固后取出,测试其抗压强度。结果采用正反双向交替旋转法调拌的磷酸锌黏固剂材料的抗压强度最大,为(106.11±4.82)MPa;上下提拉折叠法调拌的材料抗压强度次之,为(77.57±6.26)MPa;单向旋转法调拌的材料抗压强度最小,为(54.41±5.08)MPa。后两组均未达到临床要求的抗压强度100 MPa,而正反双向交替旋转法调拌的材料达到了临床要求。结论临床上使用磷酸锌黏固剂时,建议采用正反双向交替旋转法调拌。

关键词: 调拌方法, 磷酸锌黏固剂, 抗压强度

Abstract:

Objective To study the influence of hand- mixed methods on the compressive strength of the zinc phosphate dental cement. Methods Three skilled nurses used three kinds of common clinical hand- mixed methods (included the unidirectional rotation method, the alternate pro and con bidirectional rotation method and the pulling and pushing with folding method) to mix the zinc phosphate dental cement on the same condition(i.e. same indoor temperature and humidity, the same mixing ratio, mixing time, mixing frequency and the same mixing instruments and so on). The mixed zinc phosphate cement was packed into the plastic cylinders with 10 mm- high and 5 mmbore. After the mixed zinc phosphate cement coagulated, compressive strength was tested separately. Results The compressive strength of the zinc phosphate dental cement mixed with the alternate pro and con bidirectional rotation method was the best, and the value was (106.11±4.82)MPa. The compressive strength of the zinc phosphate dental cement mixed with the pulling and pushing with folding method was lower, and the value was (77.57±6.26)MPa. The compressive strength of the zinc phosphate dental cement mixed with the unidirectional rotation method was the lowest, and the value was (54.41±5.08)MPa. The compressive strength of the zinc phosphate dental cement mixed with the unidirectional rotation method and the pulling and pushing with folding method could not achieve the clinical required compressive strength(about 100 MPa), while the compressive strength mixed with the alternate pro and con bidirectional rotation method was above 100 MPa. Conclusion The alternate pro and con bidirectional rotation method to mix the zinc phosphate dental cement is recommended in clinic.

Key words: hand- mixed methods, zinc phosphate dental cement, compressive strength