华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

早期舌癌不同颈部处理方式对无病生存率影响的多因素分析

刘云生1, 刘少华1, 杨春惠2, 吴正华1   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医院口腔颌面外科, 山东济南250012; 2.山东中医药大学附属第二医院口腔颌面外科, 山东济南250001
  • 收稿日期:2007-12-25 修回日期:2007-12-25 出版日期:2007-12-20 发布日期:2007-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘云生,Tel:13969188866
  • 作者简介:刘云生( 1956-),男,山东人,副教授,硕士

Multivar iate analysis of impact of differ ent neck tr eatment and prognostic factor s affecting disease - free survival in patients with ear ly- staged squamous cell car cinoma of tongue

LIU Yun- sheng1, LIU Shao- hua1, YANG Chun- hui2, WU Zheng- hua1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; 2. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong Traditional Medical University, Jinan 250001, China
  • Received:2007-12-25 Revised:2007-12-25 Online:2007-12-20 Published:2007-12-20
  • Contact: LIU Yun- sheng,Tel:13969188866

摘要:

目的探讨影响T1/T2N0M0期舌鳞癌患者无病生存率的影响因素,比较不同颈部处理方式对无病生存率的影响。方法回顾性调查97例舌癌患者的住院病历和随访记录,采用Cox比例风险模型对性别、年龄、T分期、原发灶治疗方式、颈部处理方式和肿瘤细胞分化程度共6个可能影响患者无病生存率的因素进行筛选,Kaplan-Meier法对各影响因素进行生存率分析并计算生存率,log- rank法比较各因素不同水平生存分布的差异。重点考察不同颈部处理方式对生存率的影响。结果T分期、原发灶治疗方式、颈部处理方式和细胞分化程度是影响患者无病生存率的主要因素,其P值分别为P<0.001、P=0.04、P=0.003、P<0.001,相对风险率分别为4.387、0.496、0.504、2.620。各有影响因素下不同水平间的无病生存率有统计学差异( P<0.05)。结论cN0患者颈部不同处理方式对患者无病生存率有明显影响,颈淋巴清扫术加放疗可减少复发风险49.6%;TNM分期对早期舌癌预后有良好的描述能力。

关键词: 舌鳞状细胞癌, 颈淋巴清扫术, Cox比例风险模型, Cox回归

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the prognostic factors affecting the disease- free survival in T1/T2N0M0- staged patients with squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and compare the effectiveness of different neck treatment modalities. Methods 97 consecutive patients with early- staged squamous cell carcinoma of tongue were included in this study. The treatment and following- up records were reviewed retrospectively. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the statistically significant prognostic factors in the 6 potential factors. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the disease - free survival and analyze the survival rate among the different levels, and log- rank method for comparison of the different distribution of the survival. A special focus was on the effectiveness of different neck treatment modalities. Results T stage, treatment methods of primary tumor, the modalities of neck treatment and cell differentiation were statistically significant prognostic factors. The value of P and relative ri(sk RR)were P<0.001, RR=4.387; P=0.04, RR=0.496; P=0.003, RR=0.504; P<0.001, RR=2.620, respectively. The difference of disease- free survival was statistically significant among the different levels under the different factors. Conclusion The disease- free survival was affected by neck treatment modalities remarkably in cN0 stage patients. Selected neck dissection together with adjuvant irradiation could decrease the recurrence risk by 49.6% according to the results of this study. TNM stage system could describe the characteristics of the patients with early- staged squamous cell carcinoma of tongue reasonably.

Key words: squamous cell carcinoma of tongue, neck dissection, Cox proportional hazard model, Cox regression