华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Pancherz分析法评价头帽型肌激动器矫治骨性Ⅱ类错的疗效

张军梅  陈虹羽 张丽   

  1. 贵阳医学院附属医院口腔正畸科, 贵州贵阳550004
  • 收稿日期:2007-12-25 修回日期:2007-12-25 出版日期:2007-12-20 发布日期:2007-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 张军梅,Tel:0851- 6782551
  • 作者简介:张军梅,Tel:0851- 6782551

Pancher z′s analysis in evaluating the tr eatment effects of headgear - activator on skeletal Class Ⅱ divison 1 malocclusion

ZHANG Jun -mei, CHEN Hong- yu, ZHANG Li   

  1. Dept. of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College, Guiyang 550004, China
  • Received:2007-12-25 Revised:2007-12-25 Online:2007-12-20 Published:2007-12-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Jun -mei,Tel:0851- 6782551

摘要:

目的通过Pancherz分析法评价头帽型肌激动器( HGAC)在矫治生长发育期骨性Ⅱ类1分类错!患者中对牙和颌骨的作用机制。方法选择15例ANB角大于等于5°、覆盖大于6 mm、磨牙远中关系的错!患者为研究对象,戴用HGAC矫治8~12个月,每天戴用时间不少于14 h,治疗前后拍摄X线头颅定位侧位片,采用Pancherz分析法分析治疗前后上下颌骨和牙齿位置的变化,统计方法采用配对t检验。结果治疗后SNA角减小( P<0.05),SNB角变化不明显( P>0.05),Go/Me、co/OLP、ML/NSL增大,ANB角减小,pg/OLP增大,下切牙角增加,上切牙角减小( P<0.05);覆盖情况改善,其中骨因素44.64%,牙因素55.36%;下磨牙前移,磨牙关系得以改善,其中骨因素65.65%,牙因素34.35%。结论HGAC矫治骨性Ⅱ类1分类错!,可有效地内收远移上牙列,刺激髁突和关节窝的改建,促进下颌骨的生长。在前牙覆盖改善中,牙因素大于骨因素;在磨牙关系改善中,骨因素大于牙因素。

关键词: 骨性Ⅱ类1分类错!, 头帽肌激动器, Pancherz分析法

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effects of headgear- activat(or HGAC)combination appliances on bone and dentition of juveniles with Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion using Pancherz′s analysis approach. Methods Fifteen patients( 8 males of 10- 13 years old and 7 females of 9- 12 years old, average age was 11.2 years old, ANB≥5°, overjet≥6 mm, Class Ⅱ molar relation) were treated with HGAC appliance for more than 14 hours everyday and for total of 8 - 10 months cephalograms were taken before and after the treatment. The data was analyzed with Pancherz′s analysis and pare t te(st SPSS 11.5 software) . Results After the therapy, SNA and ANB angles re - duced, the change of SNB angle was trivial, pg/OLP was forward movement. The axial inclination of the lower incisors increased and of the upper incisor reduced. Overjet of the incisors was improved, in which skeletal factor was improved to 44.64% and dentition factor was 55.36%. The first molar on the mandible was forward movement. Molar relationship was also improved, in which skeletal factor was improved to 65.65%, and dentition factor was 34.35%. Conclusion HGAC can efficaciously treat Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion with maxillary protrusion, stimulate modification of the mandibular condyle and fossa, and promote the development of the mandibles. Dentition was improved more than skeletal on overjet, and skeletal was improved more than dentition on molar relationship.

Key words: skeletal Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, headgear- activator, Pancherz′s analysis