华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔修复常用合金间瞬间电偶电流值的测定

曹艳兰1,朱  松1,单义斌2   

  1. 1.吉林大学口腔医院  修复科,吉林  长春 130041;2.中国科学院长春应用化学研究所  电化学实验室,吉林  长春 130021
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-25 修回日期:2006-12-25 出版日期:2006-12-20 发布日期:2006-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 朱 松,Tel:0431-8796018
  • 作者简介:曹艳兰(1979-),女,江苏人,硕士研究生
  • 基金资助:

    吉林省计委重点科技资助项目(2004-987)

Measuration of Instantly Galvanic Current Magnitude among Dental Common Restorative Alloys

CAO Yan-lan1, ZHU Song1, SHAN Yi-bin2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Prosthetics, College of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China; 2. Laboratory of Electrochemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2006-12-25 Revised:2006-12-25 Online:2006-12-20 Published:2006-12-20

摘要:

目的  测定异种金属咬合接触时产生的电流值。方法  在人工唾液中体外模拟异种金属(金合金、纯钛、高含锌银汞和低含锌银汞)瞬间咬合接触时的回路。记录浸泡初各偶对的电位及瞬间接触电流值,继续浸泡8 h后再次测量,记录瞬间接触电流值。结果  多次瞬间接触引起的电流值变化无规律性。初浸时,金合金/纯钛、金合金/高含锌银汞、低含锌银汞/高含锌银汞偶对产生较大的峰值电流,纯钛/高含锌银汞偶对与其他偶对的电流值间差别有统计学意义(P<0.05);浸泡8 h后,纯钛/高含锌银汞、纯钛/低含锌银汞偶对分别与金合金/纯钛、金合金/低含锌银汞、金合金/高含锌银汞的电流值间差别有统计学意义(P<0.05);偶对浸泡8 h前后相比,只有金合金/高含锌银汞偶对的电流值间差别没有统计学意义>0.05),金合金/低含锌银汞、纯钛/高含锌银汞的电流增加。高含锌银汞的电位较负,而且实验中始终为阳极,被加速腐蚀。结论  临床医师不可忽视使用异种金属修复体早期无不适感的病例。金合金/纯钛、金合金/高含锌银汞、低含锌银汞/高含锌银汞偶对若存在于口腔中,有可能对患者造成危害。金合金/低含锌银汞、纯钛/高含锌银汞偶对也不宜共存于口腔中。临床应尽量使用低含锌银汞或者无锌银汞合金。

关键词: 牙科合金, 电偶电流, 电偶腐蚀

Abstract:

Objective  To measure the magnitude of galvanic currents produced by different occluding metallic contact. Methods  The circuits of instantly different metallic contact were simulated in artificial saliva, and electrical potential of every couple and 15 currents of instant contact were then measured. After 8 hours′ soaking, 15 currents were obtained in addition. Results  Galvanic currents variation produced by intermittently metallic contact was ruleless. During early soaking, gold/titanium, gold/high zinc-containing amalgam and low/high zinc-containing amalgam exhibited much higher current, and there was significant difference on currents between titanium/high zinc-containing amalgam and other couples(P<0.05). There was also significant difference on currents between titanium/high zinc- containing amalgam, titanium/low zinc-containing amalgam and gold/titanium, gold/low zinc-containing amalgam and gold/high zinc-containing amalgam after 8 hours′ soaking(P<0.05). In contrast with currents produced by couples before and after 8 hours′ soaking, only the currents produced by gold/high zinc-containing amalgam proved to be no significant of difference(P>0.05), while the currents produced by gold/low zinc-containing amalgam and titanium/high zinc-containing amalgam increased. Potential of high zinc-containing amalgam was more negative than other alloys, and it was always under anodic behavior during the experiment corrupted acceleratedly. Conclusion  Dentists can′t ignore the case that the patient feels normal at the beginning of wearing different occluding metallic restorations. Either of gold/titatium, gold/high zinc-containing amalgam and low/high zinc-containing amalgam appearing in oral will do harm to the patients′ health. Neither of gold/low zinc-containing amalgam nor itanium/high zinc-containing amalgam can coexist in oral. Zinc-free or low zinc-containing amalgam should be selected instead of high zinc-containing amalgam.

Key words: dentalalloy, galvaniccorrosion, galvaniccurrent