华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

可变锥度镍钛锉在树脂弯曲根管中成形效果的观察

罗红霞1,黄定明1,贾刘合1,罗世高1,高小洁1,谭  红2,周学东1   

  1. 1.口腔生物医学工程教育部重点实验室,四川大学;2.四川大学华西口腔医院  牙体牙髓科,四川  成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2006-08-25 修回日期:2006-08-25 出版日期:2006-08-20 发布日期:2006-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 周学东,Tel:028-85501481
  • 作者简介:罗红霞(1973-),女,四川人,住院医师,硕士
  • 基金资助:

    国家“十五”科技攻关课题资助项目(2004BA720A23);卫生部临床学科重点建设资助项目[卫(2004-468号)]

haping Ability of Multi-taper Nickel-titanium Files in Simulated Resin Curved Root Canal

 LUO Hong-xia1, HUANG Ding-ming1, JIA Liu-he1, LUO Shi-gao1, GAO Xiao-jie1, TAN Hong2, ZHOU Xue-dong1   

  1. 1. Key. Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2006-08-25 Revised:2006-08-25 Online:2006-08-20 Published:2006-08-20

摘要:

目的  比较不锈钢K型锉与可变锥度ProTaper镍钛锉在仿制树脂弯曲根管中的成形效果。方法  将30个仿制树脂根管随机分为3组,分别使用不锈钢K型锉、手用ProTaper锉、机用ProTaper锉预备,记录预备后根管全长内外侧树脂去除量、预备后根管宽度、根管弯曲度变化、根管偏移。结果  与不锈钢K型锉相比,手用和机用Pro Taper锉预备后的根管在根尖外侧和弯曲起始部内侧的树脂去除量较少(P<0.05),根管直化度较小(P<0.05),无明显根管偏移。结论  ProTaper锉成形效果优于不锈钢K型锉,预备后能形成一个与原形相似、流畅的锥形根管。

关键词:  ProTaper锉, 不锈钢K型锉, 根管预备, 仿制树脂根管

Abstract:

Objective  To compare the shaping ability of ISO standard stainless steel K files and multi-taper ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin curved root canals. Methods  Thirty simulated resin root canals were randomly divided into three groups and prepared by stainless steel K files, hand ProTaper, rotary ProTaper, respectively. The amount of material removed from inner and outer wall and canal width after canal preparation was measured, while the canal curvature before and after canal preparation and canals aberrations were recorded.  Results  The stainless steel K files removed more material than hand ProTaper and rotary ProTaper at the outer side of apex and inner side of curvature(P<0.05). The mean degree of straightening in stainless steel K files group was significantly bigger than in ProTaper group(P<0.05). The canals prepared by ProTaper had no evident aberration. Conclusion  The shaping ability of ProTaper is better than stainless steel K fil

Key words: ProTaper, stainless steel K file, canal preparation, simulated resin root cana