华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 315-322.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2021565

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

916份可摘局部义齿加工设计单质量的调查评估

张呐1(), 毛渤淳2, 戴云涵1, 陈圣恺1, 由子樱1, 张隽婧1, 陈昕1, 董皓月1, 岳莉1, 于海洋1()   

  1. 1.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院,成都 610041
    2.北京大学口腔医院正畸科 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-04 修回日期:2022-04-06 出版日期:2023-06-01 发布日期:2023-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 于海洋 E-mail:786517813@qq.com;yhyang6812@scu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张呐,博士,E-mail:786517813@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    成都市科技局技术创新研发项目(2019-YF05-01086-SN)

Audit to assess the quality of 916 prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures

Zhang Na1(), Mao Bochun2, Dai Yunhan1, Chen Shengkai1, You Ziying1, Zhang Junjing1, Chen Xin1, Dong Haoyue1, Yue Li1, Yu Haiyang1()   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
    2.Dept. of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-09-04 Revised:2022-04-06 Online:2023-06-01 Published:2023-06-02
  • Contact: Yu Haiyang E-mail:786517813@qq.com;yhyang6812@scu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Technological Innovation Research and Development Project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau(2019-YF05-01086-SN)

摘要:

目的 评估可摘局部义齿(RPD)加工设计单的填写质量,分析医技沟通及信息传递的现状。 方法 随机抽取某一全国性大型义齿加工厂在4周内的RPD加工设计单,按照委托方的等级将加工设计单分为3组。调查内容包括患者基本信息、医生基本信息、设计图信息、其他详细信息以及出件时间等信息。同时由2位质检员共同完成质量评估。 结果 共收集和评估了916份设计单的填写情况。患者及医生的姓名填写率最好,均为97.6%(n=894);出件时间填写情况最差,仅占6.4%(n=59)。58.7%(n=538)的设计单无医生联系电话,86.8%(n=795)设计单的设计图信息部分填写不全。质量评估结果为74.2%设计单未达到入检“合格”的标准。 结论 目前RPD加工设计单整体上看填写质量较差,RPD设计及制作中医技职责划分不明确,医技沟通情况不理想。

关键词: 可摘局部义齿, 义齿加工设计单, 医技沟通, 义齿加工厂

Abstract:

Objective The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and to analyze the current situation of the communication and information delivery between clinicians and technicians. Methods All RPD prosthetic prescriptions received by a major dental laboratory in 4 weeks were involved in a quality audit, and the prescriptions were divided into three groups in accordance with the grades of clients. The filling of prosthetic prescriptions was recorded. The items in the prescriptions for audit included the general information of the patient, the general information of the clinician, the design diagram information, other detailed information, and the return date. The prescriptions were categorized into four levels on the basis of their quality by two quality inspectors who have been working for more than 10 years. Results A total of 916 prescriptions were collected and assessed. The names in the general information of the patient and the clinician were filled out best, both at the rate of 97.6% (n=894). The return date was filled out worst, only at the rate of 6.4% (n=59). Of those prescriptions, 86.8% (n=795) exhibited inadequate design diagram information. The results of the quality assessment demonstrated that 74.2% of prescriptions were assessed as noncompliant ones and failed to meet the acceptable clinical quality standard. Conclusion At present, the overall quality of RPD prosthetic prescriptions is poor. The responsibilities of clinicians and technicians are unclear, and the communication between them is not ideal.

Key words: removable partial dentures, prosthetic prescription, communication, dental laboratory

中图分类号: