前牙种植基台的临床决策——Lights决策树

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2022.05.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基台在种植修复系统中连接根方种植体与冠方上部修复体，是承上启下的重要部件。在符合机械及生物学等常规规范下，基台的合理设计选择可一定程度上弥补目标修复体空间（TRS）与种植体空间位置上的偏差，对维系种植体周组织的健康及修复体长期、稳定、有效的预后发挥重要的作用。与后牙基台相比，日常使用的前牙基台种类更加繁杂，如何能够便捷正确选择前牙基台极具挑战性。本决策方案通过虚拟种植设计进行正确种植位点比选，并与上部目标修复体进行术前统筹后，实测选定位点上种植体平面目标修复空间高度（I），预判能否进行种植修复及可选的种植修复体固位方式。术后再根据种植系统（S）、螺钉孔穿出位置和修复体固位方式等初选基台类型；进入术后二期修复时，再结合种植体周水平软组织厚度（T）、穿龈深度（GH）及长轴角度（L）等的实测核查值，完成永久基台的最终选择。同时具体讨论了个性化基台的概念和分类应用。该方案的主控变量L、I、GH、T、S组合成了Lights字样，因此简称为前牙基台Lights决策树。该决策树的决策效能良好，临床可及性高。

关键词: 前牙种植, 基台, 决策树, 临床路径, 种植上部修复

Abstract:

Abutment is an important component serving as a connecting link between the implant and the implant-supported prosthesis. In accordance with mechanical, biological, and other conventional norms, it can compensate the deviation between the implant and the prosthesis, which plays a significant role in maintaining the health of peri-implant tissue and the longevity, stability, and effectivity of prosthesis. However, choosing an anterior implant abutment correctly and conveniently is challenging, given the great variety of anterior abutment in clinical practice. Through virtual implant design, the correct implant site was compared and selected, and the supra-target prosthesis was coordinated before and after the operation. The implant level vertical of height of target restoration space (I) was measured to predict the availability and the retentive method of the implant restoration. After implantation, the primary selection of abutment type was selected according to the implant system (S), screw access position, and retentive method of the prosthesis. The final selection of abutment is accomplished by combining the measured values of peri-implant soft tissue thickness (T), gingival height (GH), and long axis of implant (L). Furthermore, the concepts and the classified applications of custom abutment were discussed in detail in this paper. The plan's main control variables L, I, GH, T, and S compose the words Lights, so this plan can be abbreviated as the anterior abutment decision tree. The decision tree has good decision-making efficiency and high clinical accessibility.

Key words: anterior implantation, abutment, decision tree, clinical pathway, implant-supported supra-restruction

中图分类号:

R 783.4

于海洋, 孙蔓琳, 王中熠. 前牙种植基台的临床决策——Lights决策树[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(5): 504-512.

Yu Haiyang, Sun Manlin, Wang Zhongyi.. Clinical decision-making of anterior implant abutment[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 40(5): 504-512.

图/表 3

参考文献 48

1	Zheng Z, Ao XG, Xie P, et al. The biological width around implant[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2021, 65(1): 11-18.
2	Avila-Ortiz G, Gonzalez-Martin O, Couso-Queiruga E, et al. The peri-implant phenotype[J]. J Periodontol, 2020, 91(3): 283-288.
3	Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(4): 873-876.
4	Gjelvold B, Sohrabi MM, Chrcanovic BR. Angled screw channel: an alternative to cemented single-implant restorations: three clinical examples[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2016, 29(1): 74-76.
5	Edmondson EK, Trejo PM, Soldatos N, et al. The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: a CBCT analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021: S0022-S3913(21)00032-9.
6	Gervais MJ, Hatzipanagiotis P, Wilson PR. Cross-pinning: the philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant-supported prostheses[J]. Aust Dent J, 2008, 53(1): 74-82.
7	于海洋, 李俊颖. 目标修复体空间的内涵、分析设计及临床转移实施[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(2): 111-114.
	Yu HY, Li JY. The concept, clinical design and transfer application of target restoration space[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2015, 33(2): 111-114.
8	张煜强, 于海洋. 颌间距离还是目标修复空间值——实测数值引导的无牙颌种植修复的临床决策[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 233-237.
	Zhang YQ, Yu HY. Interarch distance is a target restora-tive space value: clinical decisionmaking of implant restoration guided by measured value[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2021, 39(2): 233-237.
9	Bagegni A, Spies BC, Kern M, et al. The influence of prosthetic crown height and implant-abutment connection design selection on the long-term implant-abutment stability: a laboratory study[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021, 113: 104095.
10	Fabbri G, Fradeani M, Dellificorelli G, et al. Clinical evaluation of the influence of connection type and restoration height on the reliability of zirconia abutments: a retrospective study on 965 abutments with a mean 6-year follow-up[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017, 37(1): 19-31.
11	Puisys A, Vindasiute E, Linkevciene L, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix membrane for vertical soft tissue augmentation during submerged implant placement: a case series[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(4): 465-470.
12	Tomasi C, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, et al. Bone dimensio-nal variations at implants placed in fresh extraction soc-kets: a multilevel multivariate analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 21(1): 30-36.
13	Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, et al. Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability a-round triangular-shaped implants: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(7): 716-724.
14	Staubli N, Walter C, Schmidt JC, et al. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease—a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(10): 1278-1290.
15	Scarano A, Inchingolo F, Scogna S, et al. Peri-implant disease caused by residual cement around implant-supported restorations: a clinical report[J]. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2021, 35(2 ): 211-216.
16	Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, et al. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(12): 1379-1384.
17	Guarnieri R, Testarelli L, DeVilliers P. Features of peri-implantitis associated with luting cement extrusion: a histopathologic report in humans[J]. Quintessence Int, 2020, 51(5): 398-404.
18	Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz R, Sculean A. Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2019, 81(1): 7-17.
19	Fiorellini JP, Luan KW, Chang YC, et al. Peri-implant mucosal tissues and inflammation: clinical implications[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34: s25-s33.
20	Lops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, et al. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(10): 1263-1268.
21	Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, et al. In vitio color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2007, 27(3): 251-257.
22	Barwacz CA, Shah KC, Bittner N, et al. A retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional case series study evaluating outcomes of CAD/CAM abutments on implants from four manufacturers: 4-year mean follow-up[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2021, 36(5): 966-976.
23	Amorfini L, Storelli S, Mosca D, et al. Comparison of cemented vs screw-retained, customized computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture zirconia abutments for esthetically located single-tooth implants: a 10-year randomized prospective study[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2018, 31(4): 359-366.
24	Rathe F, Junker R, Gröger S, et al. Inflammatory effects of individualized abutments bonded onto titanium base on peri-implant tissue health: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2021, 23(6): 874-882.
25	Serichetaphongse P, Chengprapakorn W, Thongmeearkom S, et al. Immunohistochemical assessment of the peri-implant soft tissue around different abutment materials: a human study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22(5): 638-646.
26	Canullo L, Annunziata M, Pesce P, et al. Influence of abutment material and modifications on peri-implant soft-tissue attachment: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of histological animal studies[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(3): 426-436.
27	Hu ML, Chen JY, Pei XB, et al. Network Meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials[J]. J Dent, 2019, 88: 103115.
28	Sampatanukul T, Serichetaphongse P, Pimkhaokham A. Histological evaluations and inflammatory responses of different dental implant abutment materials: a human histology pilot study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(2): 160-169.
29	Fonseca M, Molinero-Mourelle P, Forrer FA, et al. Clinical performance of implant crowns with customized zirconia abutments: a prospective cohort study with a 4.5- to 8.8-year follow-up[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(7): 853-862.
30	Di Fiore A, Granata S, Monaco C, et al. Clinical performance of posterior monolithic zirconia implant-suppor-ted fixed dental prostheses with angulated screw channels: a 3-year prospective cohort study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021: S0022-S3913(21)00361-9.
31	Nastri L, Nucci L, Grassia V, et al. Aesthetic outcomes and peri-implant health of angled screw retained implant restorations compared with cement retained crowns: medium term follow-up[J]. J Funct Biomater, 2021, 12(2): 35.
32	Chang YT, Wu YL, Chen HS, et al. Comparing the fracture resistance and modes of failure in different types of CAD/CAM zirconia abutments with internal hexagonal implants: an in vitro study[J]. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(7): 2656.
33	Sen N, Us YO. Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 122(3): 315.e1-315.e7.
34	Mizumoto RM, Malamis D, Mascarenhas F, et al. Titanium implant wear from a zirconia custom abutment: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(2): 201-205.
35	Queiroz DA, Hagee N, Lee DJ, et al. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 124(2): 211-216.
36	Güler U, Budak Y, Queiroz JRC, et al. Dislodgement resistance of zirconia copings cemented onto zirconia and titanium abutments[J]. Implant Dent, 2017, 26(4): 510-515.
37	Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(1): 112-114.
38	Linkevičius T. Zero bone loss concepts[M]. Batavia: Quintessence Publishing Co., 2020: 203-205.
39	Gehrke P, Bleuel K, Fischer C, et al. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study[J]. B-MC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1): 111.
40	Perez A, Caiazzo A, Valente NA, et al. Standard vs customized healing abutments with simultaneous bone graf-ting for tissue changes around immediate implants. 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22(1): 42-53.
41	Menchini-Fabris GB, Crespi R, Toti P, et al. A 3-year retrospective study of fresh socket implants: CAD/CAM customized healing abutment vs cover screws[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2020, 23(2): 109-117.
42	Wang LN, Wang TT, Lu YF, et al. Comparing the clinical outcome of peri-implant hard and soft tissue treated with immediate individualized CAD/CAM healing abutments and conventional healing abutments for single-tooth implants in esthetic areas over 12 months: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2021, 36(5): 977-984.
43	Gamborena I, Sasaki Y, Blatz MB. Predictable immediate implant placement and restoration in the esthetic zone[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2021, 33(1): 158-172.
44	Zhuang JB, Wang YY, Song YS, et al. The application of individualized abutment-crown integrated provisional re-storation in optimizing the peri-implant soft tissue contour in the esthetic zone[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2021, 33(4): 560-566.
45	Pinhata-Baptista OH, Kim JH, Choi IGG, et al. Full digital workflow for anterior immediate implants using custom abutments[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2021, 47(2): 140-144.
46	Zhu JK, Xie CY, Wang YK, et al. A digital workflow for accurately and rapidly creating an immediate provisional restoration with natural emergence profile using extracted tooth[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2022, 34(5): 741-749.
47	Costa AJME, Burgoa S, Rayes A, et al. Digital workflow for CAD-CAM custom abutments of immediate implants based on natural emergence profile of the tooth to be extracted[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2021. DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00214 .
48	Naveau A, Rignon-Bret C, Wulfman C. Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review of mechanical and esthetic outcomes[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(5): 775-781.

[1]	于海洋, 赵俊颐, 孙蔓琳. 基于审美分析的口腔美容修复分类诊疗方案（一）：基本概念、决策树及临床路径[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 19-27.
[2]	沈溱原, 黄忞, 魏俊超, 张琦, 吴润发. 不同修复基台经循环加载后的扭矩丧失和基台沉降[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 409-413.
[3]	王彦梅, 刘鑫, 何家才. 角度螺丝通道基台一体冠在美学区种植修复中的短期临床效果研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2021, 39(6): 712-717.
[4]	罗天, 李俊颖, 于海洋. 制备高精度牙预备体肩台的临床路径和预备方法[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(6): 712-717.
[5]	张帅, 吕川, 李进红, 朱保民, 王维倩. 基台颈部缓冲层对种植体应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(5): 537-540.
[6]	施斌, 曾浩. 种植修复基台的选择[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(2): 124-126.
[7]	林野. 当代牙种植体设计进步与临床意义[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 18-28.
[8]	钟倩周国兴光寒冰戴文雍邱憬王国平朱志军汤春波 . 个性化铸瓷复合基台在前牙种植美学修复中的临床应用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2013, 31(4): 429-431,433.
[9]	兰晶徐欣姜广水管延锦黄海云梁晋马晓妮. Replace内、外连接方式种植体-基台内部的应力分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2011, 29(05): 464-468.