华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔黏膜病问卷中文版的信度和效度评价

王琳1 杨小竺2,3 陈方淳2,4   

  1. 1.重庆大学医院口腔科,重庆 400045;2.重庆市口腔疾病与生物医学研究中心;3.重庆医科大学附属口腔医院种植科;4.口腔黏膜科,重庆 401147
  • 出版日期:2014-12-01 发布日期:2014-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 杨小竺,主治医师,硕士,E-mail:yangxiao6196@sina. com
  • 作者简介:王琳,主治医师,硕士,E-mail:wanglinhx@sina.com

Reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of the chronic oral mucosal disease questionnaire

Wang Lin1, Yang Xiaozhu2,3, Chen Fangchun2,4.   

  1. 1. Dept. of Stomatology, Chongqing University Hospital, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Chongqing Research Center for Oral Diseases and Biomedical Science, Chongqing 401147, China; 3. Dept. of Implant Dentistry, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, China; 4. Dept. of Oral Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, China
  • Online:2014-12-01 Published:2014-12-01

摘要:

目的 评价口腔黏膜病问卷(COMDQ)中文版的信度和效度。方法对COMDQ进行初译、回译、质量评价、文化调适和预评估,形成COMDQ中文版。该量表包括26个条目,涉及4个维度:疼痛和功能限制、药物治疗相关、社交及情感功能、对患者的支持。进而将其应用于口腔黏膜病患者,最终对调查结果进行统计学分析,考评量表的信度和效度。结果共回收有效问卷130份。量表总的克朗巴赫α系数为0.914,Guttman分半信度系数为0.809,表格之间相关性r为0.697。经过验证性因子分析,提取4个因子,累积贡献率达67.62%,显示量表存在预想的连带关系和逻辑关系。结论COMDQ中文版通过严格的性能测试,具有良好的信度和效度,可在国内口腔黏膜病患者中推广应用。

关键词: 口腔黏膜病问卷, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the chronic oral mucosal disease questionnaire (COMDQ). Methods Using translation, back-translation, quality evaluation, cross-cultural adaptation, and pre-assessment, a Chinese version of the COMDQ was drafted. A 26-item instrument which comprised of four domains: pain and functional limitation, medications and side effects, social and emotional aspects, and patient support was designed and tested. This questionnaire was given to patients who visited our clinic. After the patients accomplished the questionnaires, we analyzed the collected data to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results A total of 130 patients were enrolled in our study. All the COMDQ questionnaires were completely filled out. The Chinese version of the COMDQ showed the following psychometric properties: Cronbach’s alpha of 0.914, split-half reliability of 0.809, and correlation of 0.697. Factor analysis of construct validity demonstrated that the 26 items were classified into four domains, and the cumulative proportion was 67.62%. Thus, the scale had certain logical relation between the items in the same domains. Conclusion The Chinese version of the COMDQ demonstrate good reliability and validity by rigorous psychometric properties. It can be widely used to test the oral health-related quality of life of patients with oral mucosal diseases.

Key words: chronic oral mucosal diseases questionnaire, reliability, validity