华西口腔医学杂志

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同氟浓度人工唾液对3种牙用铸造合金表面形貌的影响

程玮1,2 于海利3 林雪芬1 韩晓鹏3 刘利苹3 丁婷婷1 汲平1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学口腔医院修复科; 2.山东省口腔生物医学重点实验室, 济南250012;3.烟台市口腔医院修复科, 烟台264000
  • 收稿日期:2012-02-25 修回日期:2012-02-25 出版日期:2012-02-01 发布日期:2012-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 汲平,Tel:0531-88382448
  • 作者简介:程玮(1984—),女,山东人,硕士

The effect of fluoride on dental alloys in different concentrations of fluoride artificial saliva

Cheng Wei1,2, Yu Haili3, Lin Xuefen1, Han Xiaopeng3, Liu Liping3, Ding Tingting1, Ji Ping1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; 2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Jinan 250012, China; 3. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Yantai Dental Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
  • Received:2012-02-25 Revised:2012-02-25 Online:2012-02-01 Published:2012-02-01
  • Contact: Ji Ping,Tel:0531-88382448
  • About author:Cheng Wei(1984—),女,山东人,硕士

摘要:

目的研究钴铬合金、纯钛及高钴铬钼合金浸泡于不同氟浓度人工唾液发生腐蚀后表面形貌的改变,分析金属的耐腐蚀性。方法将3种金属试件打磨后浸泡于不同氟浓度(0%、0.05%、0.2%)人工唾液中,(37.0±1.0)℃浸泡3周,测量浸泡前后表面粗糙度并观察表面形貌。结果浸泡后金属表面粗糙度随氟浓度升高而增加。在含氟0.05%人工唾液中浸泡后,钴铬合金和纯钛的表面粗糙度与其浸泡前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);钴铬合金、纯钛与高钴铬钼合金相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);在含氟0.2%人工唾液中浸泡后,3种金属的表面粗糙度较浸泡前差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),3种金属间相比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论常使用含氟制品的患者不宜选用纯钛及钴铬合金修复体。口内有这3种金属的患者,不宜长时间使用高氟制品。

关键词: 氟, 耐腐蚀性, 钴铬合金, 纯钛, 表面粗糙度

Abstract:

Objective To study the changes in surface morphology of cobalt-chromium alloy, pure titanium and high-cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy immersed in artificial saliva with different concentrations of fluoride, and to analyze the corrosion resistance of these metals. Methods The three kinds of metal were polished and then were immersed in artificial saliva with different concentrations of fluoride(0%, 0.05%, 0.2%). All specimens were immersed for 3 weeks at(37.0±1.0)℃. Metal surface roughness before and after immersion were measured and analyzed by scanning electron microscope(SEM). Results Metal surface roughness was increased with the concentration of fluoride. The surface roughness of the Co-Cr group and Ti group had a statistically significant difference between before and after immersion at the fluoride concentration of 0.05%(P<0.01), and the difference between Co-Cr group and vitallium2000 group, Ti group and vitallium2000 group were statistically significant difference(P<0.01). The differences of three groups before and after immersion were statistically significant at the fluoride concentration of 0.2%(P<0.01), and the difference among three groups was statistically significant(P <0.01). Conclusion Patients who frequently use fluoride products should not use pure titanium or cobalt-chromium alloy prosthesis. Patients with these three metal prostheses are not advised to use high concentration fluoride products.

Key words: fluoride, corrosion resistance, cobalt-chromium alloy, pure titanium, surface roughness