1 |
Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge T, et al. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-suppor-ted, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study[J]. Clin O-ral Implants Res, 2019, 30(10): 1005-1015.
|
2 |
Pessoa R, Siqueira R, Li J, et al. The impact of surgi-cal guide fixation and implant location on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery[J]. J Prosthodont, 2022, 31(2): 155-164.
|
3 |
Garcia-Hammaker S, George FM. Use of a surgical template for minimally invasive second-stage surgery: a den-tal technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(1): 37-40.
|
4 |
Gao J, Li J, Liu C, et al. A stereolithographic template for computer-assisted teeth preparation in dental esthetic ceramic veneer treatment[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2020, 32(8): 763-769.
|
5 |
Ackerman S, Aguilera FC, Buie JM, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional-printed endodontic surgical guide: a human cadaver study[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(5): 615-618.
|
6 |
D’haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery[J]. Perio-dontol 2000, 2017, 73(1): 121-133.
|
7 |
Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position using surgical guides fabricated by additive and subtractive techniques[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020, 29(6): 534-541.
|
8 |
Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, et al. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(1): 101-115.
|
9 |
Tuğcu E, Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan YK, et al. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers on teeth with different preparation depths[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2018, 38(): s87-s95.
|
10 |
Yu H, Zhao Y, Li J, et al. Minimal invasive microscopic tooth preparation in esthetic restoration: a specialist consensus[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2019, 11(3): 31.
|
11 |
Coachman C, Gurel G, Calamita M, et al. The influence of tooth color on preparation design for laminate veneers from a minimally invasive perspective: case report[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2014, 34(4): 453-459.
|
12 |
Magne P, Douglas WH. Additive contour of porcelain veneers: a key element in enamel preservation, adhesion, and esthetics for aging dentition[J]. J Adhes Dent, 1999, 1(1): 81-92.
|
13 |
Revilla-León M, Sánchez-Rubio JL, Besné-Torre A, et al. A report on a diagnostic digital workflow for esthetic dental rehabilitation using additive manufacturing technologies[J]. Int J Esthet Dent, 2018, 13(2): 184-196.
|
14 |
Cattoni F, Teté G, Calloni AM, et al. Milled versus moulded mock-ups based on the superimposition of 3D meshes from digital oral impressions: a comparative in vitro study in the aesthetic area[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1): 230.
|
15 |
Otani T, Raigrodski AJ, Mancl L, et al. In vitro evaluation of accuracy and precision of automated robotic too-th preparation system for porcelain laminate veneers[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(2): 229-235.
|
16 |
Liu C, Guo J, Gao J, et al. Computer-assisted tooth preparation template and predesigned restoration: a digital workflow[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2020, 23(4): 351-362.
|
17 |
Gao J, He J, Fan L, et al. Accuracy of reduction depths of tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers assisted by different tooth preparation guides: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2022, 31(7): 593-600.
|
18 |
Silva BPD, Stanley K, Gardee J. Laminate veneers: preplanning and treatment using digital guided tooth preparation[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2020, 32(2): 150-160.
|
19 |
D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012, 14(3): 321-335.
|