华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同桩核系统及根管重塑对漏斗形根管下颌前磨牙抗折特性的研究

刘翠玲 高旭 蓝菁 汲平   

  1. 山东大学口腔医院修复科, 山东济南250012
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-25 修回日期:2010-06-25 出版日期:2010-06-20 发布日期:2010-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 汲平,Tel:0531-88382448
  • 作者简介:刘翠玲(1970—),女,山东人,主治医师,硕士

Fracture behavior of mandibular premolars with flared root canals restored with different post-and-core systems and root rehabilitation

LIU Cui-ling, GAO Xu, LAN Jing, JI Ping   

  1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2010-06-25 Revised:2010-06-25 Online:2010-06-20 Published:2010-06-20
  • Contact: JI Ping,Tel:0531-88382448

摘要:

目的探讨不同桩核及根管重塑对漏斗形根管下颌前磨牙抗折特性的影响。方法将36颗离体下颌前磨牙随机分为A、B、C、D共4组,每组9颗。A、B、C组设为实验组,预备成漏斗形根管,A组用预成玻璃纤维桩复合树脂核修复,B组用预成钛合金平行螺纹桩复合树脂核修复,C组用复合树脂根管重塑铸造桩核修复;D组(对照组)采用正常根管预备,行铸造桩核修复。桩核修复后,4组均行铸造全冠修复。在电子万能试验机上以与牙体长轴成30°方向,以1 mm·min-1速度加载至样本折裂,分析4组样本的抗折载荷和折裂模式。折裂模式分为可修复性和不可修复性。对抗折载荷行单因素方差分析,对折裂模式采用Fisher′s确切概率法分析。结果A、B、C、D组的抗折载荷分别为(1.39±0.56)、(1.17±0.40)、(1.21±0.30)、(1.31±0.56)kN,4组间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A、B、C、D组产生不可修复性折裂的样本分别为6、8、9、9颗,4组间折裂模式的差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论不同桩核系统对下颌前磨牙漏斗形根管残根的抗折特性没有影响,复合树脂重塑可作为漏斗形根管残根修复的一种选择。

关键词: 桩核, 根管重塑, 漏斗形根管, 抗折强度

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the influence of the restoration methods with different post-and-core systems and root rehabilitation on the fracture resistance property of mandibular premolars with flared root canals. Methods Thirty-six human mandibular premolars were divided randomly into four groups(n=9). Three experimental groups with flared root canals were restored with prefabricated glass fiber posts and composite resin cores(group A), prefabricated titanium metal posts and composite resin cores(group B) and cast post-and-cores in combination with root rehabilitation using composite resin(group C), respectively. The control group with normal root canals was restored with cast post-and-cores(group D). The four groups were restored with metal crowns. A compressive load was applied at a 30° angle to the long axis of the tooth until fracture, at a crosshead speed of 1 mm·min-1. The fracture was categorized into repairable mode and unrepairable mode. The data was statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Fisher′s exact test. Results The mean failure of the four groups were listed as the followings: Group A(1.39±0.56)kN, group B (1.17±0.40)kN, group C (1.21±0.30)kN, group D (1.31±0.56)kN. There were no significant differences among the groups(P>0.05). The number of unrepairable fracture in group A, B, C, D were 6, 8, 9, 9, respectively. No significant differences were found among the groups(P >0.05). Conclusion Different post -and -core systems have no influences on the fracture resistance property of mandibular premolars with flared root canals. Composite resin rehabilitation is an effective method to restore flared canal roots.

Key words: post-and-core, root rehabilitation, flared root canal, fracture resistance