华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 299-303.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.03.014

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

铸瓷高嵌体修复牙体严重缺损的年轻恒磨牙的效果分析

陈宇,李勉香,张颖()   

  1. 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心口腔科 广州 510623
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-05 修回日期:2019-03-25 出版日期:2019-06-01 发布日期:2019-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 张颖 E-mail:512697367@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈宇,主治医师,硕士,E-mail:150517367@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    广州市医药卫生科技一般引导项目(20151A010052);广东省中医药局立项(20171205)

Effect analysis of ceramic onlay to repair serious dental defects in young permanent molars

Yu Chen,Mianxiang Li,Ying Zhang()   

  1. Dept. of Stomatology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
  • Received:2018-12-05 Revised:2019-03-25 Online:2019-06-01 Published:2019-06-12
  • Contact: Ying Zhang E-mail:512697367@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Guangzhou Medical Science and Technology General Guidance Project(20151A010052);Project of Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine(20171205)

摘要:

目的 评价铸瓷高嵌体修复严重缺损的年轻恒磨牙的临床效果。方法 选取牙体严重缺损的第一恒磨牙60颗,随机分为2组,分别进行树脂直接充填(树脂组)和铸瓷高嵌体修复(高嵌体组)。在修复后3、6、12、24个月检查两组患牙的修复体状态及咬合情况。按照改良USPHS/Ryge标准对修复体进行评价,使用T-Scan Ⅲ咬合分析系统进行咬合分析,记录牙龈状况和邻接关系恢复情况。结果 治疗后12个月,两组边缘适合性评分的差异有统计学意义,高嵌体组的A级多于树脂组(P<0.05)。治疗后12和24个月,两组表面光滑度评分的差异有统计学意义,高嵌体组的A级多于树脂组(P<0.05)。树脂组的患牙与对侧同名牙力百分比的差异均有统计学意义,患牙平均力百分比低于对侧同名牙(P<0.05);而高嵌体组的患牙与对侧同名牙力百分比的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组的牙龈状况和食物嵌塞情况均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 在本研究条件下,高嵌体组在修复体边缘适合性和表面光滑度方面,成功率较树脂组高,咬合力恢复也较树脂组更佳。在修复牙体严重缺损的年轻恒牙时,铸瓷高嵌体修复可作为推荐方案之一,有较好的修复效果。

关键词: 年轻恒磨牙, 牙体缺损, 树脂充填, 铸瓷高嵌体

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the effect of ceramic onlay to repair serious defects in young permanent molars. Methods Sixty patients with defects in young permanent molars were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group was restored with ceramic onlay, and the other used resin composite to direct filling. Follow-up visit was conducted at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Modified USPHS/Ryge criteria were used to evaluate the effect of restoration. The occlusal courses were recorded by the T-Scan Ⅲ system in intercuspal position. Gingival and food impaction were recorded. The effect of the two restorative methods, the recovery of occlusal function, and the gingival and approximal conditions were analyzed. Results At 12 months after restoration, the marginal fitness in the onlay group was significantly better than that in the resin group (P<0.05). At 12 and 24 months after restoration, the surface smoothness in the onlay group was significantly better than that in the resin composite group (P<0.05). At each follow-up visit, the resin group had significantly lower percentage of occlusal force than contralateral molar (P<0.05). The percentage of occlusal force in the onlay group and the contralateral molar showed no statistical difference (P>0.05). The gingival and approximal conditions also demonstrated no statistical differences (P>0.05). Conclusion The ceramic onlay repair method is better than resin composite filling in marginal fitness, surface smoothness, and recovery of the occlusal function when restoring young permanent molars with serious defects.

Key words: young permanent molar, dental defect, resin composite filling, ceramic onlay

中图分类号: