华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

成人安氏Ⅱ类错正畸人群正中关系位与最大牙尖交错位不调的研究

邓潇1 万哲2 何姝姝3 Peter Wamalwa3,4 陈嵩3 张智轶5   

  1. 1.重庆医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科, 重庆400015;2.新疆医科大学第六附属医院口腔科, 乌鲁木齐830002; 3.四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科, 成都610041;4.Division of Orthodontics, Dept. of Dentistry, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi 00202, Kenya;5.重庆医科大学附属口腔医院修复科, 重庆400015
  • 收稿日期:2011-02-25 修回日期:2011-02-25 出版日期:2011-02-20 发布日期:2011-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 张智轶,Tel:023-89035721
  • 作者简介:邓潇(1982—),男,重庆人,住院医师,硕士

The centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy in adult Angle’s Class Ⅱ pretreatment patients

 DENG Xiao1, WAN Zhe2, HE Shu-shu3, Peter Wamalwa3,4, CHEN Song3, ZHANG Zhi-yi5   

  1. 1. Dept. of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400015, China; 2. Dept. of Stomatology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830002, China; 3. Dept. of Orthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 4. Division of Orthodontics, Dept. of Dentistry, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi 00202, Kenya; 5. Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400015, China
  • Received:2011-02-25 Revised:2011-02-25 Online:2011-02-20 Published:2011-02-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Zhi-yi,Tel:023-89035721

摘要:

目的横向调查安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形正畸人群中正中关系(CR)位与最大牙尖交错(MI)位不一致的比例及严重程度,为制定临床治疗计划提供参考。方法选取符合纳入标准的安氏Ⅱ类错牙合患者80例,以及个别正常牙合人50例。使用双手法配合负荷试验取得所有受检者CR位的咬合记录,使用Panadent牙合架将所有受检者的牙科模型在CR位上牙合架并进行分析。采用髁突位置测量仪(CPI)测量并记录每个受检者CR位与MI位的髁突位置在三维方向上的差异。结果1)安氏Ⅱ类错牙合组有74例患者存在CR-MI不调,阳性率为92.50%;个别正常牙合组仅有5例,阳性率为10.00%,二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。2)安氏Ⅱ类错牙合组中,55例的CR-MI不调类型为一致性不调,占74例CR-MI不调患者的74.32%。3)安氏Ⅱ类错牙合组与个别正常牙合组的牙合干扰大多数位于后牙区,分别占91.25%和66.00%。结论进行正畸治疗前有必要分析安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者CR-MI的一致性,以制定出正确的治疗计划。

关键词: 正中关系位, 安氏Ⅱ类错牙合, 髁突位置测量仪

Abstract:

Objective This study investigates the differences in condylar position between centric relation(CR) and maximum intercuspation(MI) in Angle’s Class Ⅱ orthodontic patients before treatment. Methods 80 cases, who were Angle’s Class Ⅱ pretreatment patients, and 50 cases, who were normal(ideal) occlusion were accepted. Dental casts were mounted on Panadent articulator with CR bite record, taken by bilateral manipulation and load testing. The differences in condylar position between CR and MI in all three spatial planes were measured using the Panadent condylar position indication(CPI). Results 1)The positive rate of CR-MI discrepancy was 92.50%(74 cases) in the group of Angle’s Class Ⅱ malocclusion and 10.00%(5 cases) in the group of normal occlusion(P< 0.001). 2)74.32%(55 cases) CR-MI discrepancy in 74 cases in the group of Angle’s Class Ⅱ pretreatment patients were coincidence discrepancy. 3)91.25% patients in the group of Angle’s Class Ⅱ malocclusion and 66.00% in the group of normal occlusion present occlusion interferences which located at the posterior teeth. Conclusion The results suggested that orthodontists should be aware of a high incidence of condylar displacement in Angle’s Class Ⅱ pretreatment patients, and measure condylar displacement before the start of comprehensive orthodontic treatment to unmask real jaw relationships and avoid possible misdiagnoses.

Key words: centric relation, Angle’s Class Ⅱ malocclusion, condylar position indication