Facial scarless surgical approach for mandibular condyle fracture

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2025.2025405

Abstract

Abstract:

The selection of surgical approaches for mandibular condylar fractures faces dual challenges of anatomical complexity and the risk of complications. This article reviews conventional approaches and proposes a classification system centered on anatomical pathways. In light of the growing emphasis on aesthetic demands and advances in minimally invasive techniques, the evolution and implementation of the “facial scarless” concept are discussed. Particular attention is given to the endoscopic intraoral and retroauricular transmeatal approaches, with analysis of their clinical applications, advantages, and limitations, aiming to provide insights for optimizing individualized surgical strategies in the management of condylar fractures.

Key words: mandibular condylar fracture, surgical approach, facial scarless, endoscopy, minimally invasive

CLC Number:

R782.4

Chen Jinlong, Liu Lei. Facial scarless surgical approach for mandibular condyle fracture[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2026, 44(2): 173-179.

Figures/Tables 4

References 39

[1]	Alyahya A, Bin Ahmed A, Nusair Y, et al. Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 58(6): 625-631.
[2]	Chrcanovic BR. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(2): 158-179.
[3]	Leow J, Exley R, Holmes S, et al. How good is good enough? Lessons learned from review of outcomes of 50 patients following extraoral open reduction and internal fixation of condylar neck and base fractures at a regional major trauma centre[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2024, 62(1): 83-88.
[4]	Tandon S, Verma V, Rashid M, et al. Is the facial nerve at risk following surgical correction of mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Natl J Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 13(): S1-S10.
[5]	Al-Moraissi EA, Louvrier A, Colletti G, et al. Does the surgical approach for treating mandibular condylar fractures affect the rate of seventh cranial nerve injuries? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a new classification for surgical approaches[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2018, 46(3): 398-412.
[6]	Chen J. Outcome analyses of endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach for surgical treatment of subcondylar fracture[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2025, 54(): 53.
[7]	Soltani AM, Francis CS, Motamed A, et al. Hypertrophic scarring in cleft lip repair: a comparison of incidence among ethnic groups[J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 4: 187-191.
[8]	Mansuri Z, Dhuvad J, Anchlia S, et al. Comparison of three different approaches in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures—Our experience[J]. Natl J Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 14(2): 256-263.
[9]	Pulino B, De Andrade JF, De Macedo TFO, et al. Surgical approaches for condylar fractures: an analysis of the advantages of transmeatal retroauricular access[J]. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2025, 17: 100500.
[10]	Kanno T. Surgical approaches to open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures[J]. Shimane J Med Sci, 2020, 37(3): 83-94.
[11]	Koirala U, Subedi S. Retromandibular transparotid approach for subcondylar mandibular fracture: a retrospective study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2021, 37(2): 314-320.
[12]	Hou J, Chen L, Wang T, et al. A new surgical approach to treat medial or low condylar fractures: the minor parotid anterior approach[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2014, 117(3): 283-288.
[13]	Tang W, Gao C, Long J, et al. Application of modified retromandibular approach indirectly from the anterior edge of the parotid gland in the surgical treatment of condylar fracture[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(3): 552-558.
[14]	Nitesh C, Kirthi RK, Amar UP, et al. “Cervicomastoid versus retromandibular extension of pre-auricular incision in transmasseteric anteroparotid approach for condylar fracture management-a prospective study”[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2023, 22(3): 652-660.
[15]	Narayanan V, Ramadorai A, Ravi P, et al. Transmassete-ric anterior parotid approach for condylar fractures: experience of 129 cases[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 50(5): 420-424.
[16]	Scolozzi P, Foletti JM. A closer examination of the retromandibular subparotid approach: surgical technique and anatomical considerations with a special focus on the angular tract. A cadaveric study and a technical note[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 121(5): 569-574.
[17]	Tomar K. Efficacy of the retroparotid trans-masseteric approach via retromandibular incision in ORIF of subcondylar fractures: our institution experience[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2018, 17(3): 332-338.
[18]	Girhe V, Patil V, Bhujbal R, et al. Pre-auricular transparotid approach for the management of mandibular condylar fracture: an experience of 82 cases[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2022, 21(3): 916-922.
[19]	Al-Kayat A, Bramley P. A modified pre-auricular approach to the temporomandibular joint and malar arch[J]. Br J Oral Surg, 1979, 17(2): 91-103.
[20]	Pau M, Feichtinger M, Reinbacher KE, et al. Trans-tragal incision for improved exposure of diacapitular and condylar neck fractures[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 41(1): 61-65.
[21]	Girotto R, Cirignaco G, De Tomaso S, et al. Trans-Tragal approach for mandibular neck and head condylar fra-ctures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2025, 36(4): 1306-1309.
[22]	Anchlia S, Sahal A, Bhatt U, et al. The perimeatal modification of inviscision: in the search of the ideal preauricular incision[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2025[2025-06-23]. .
[23]	Li H, Zhang G, Cui J, et al. A modified preauricular approach for treating intracapsular condylar fractures to prevent facial nerve injury: the supratemporalis approach[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74(5): 1013-1022.
[24]	Frenkel B, Abu Shqara F, Berg T, et al. Endoscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation of sub-condylar fractures: debunking some of the myths[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31(6): 1727-1730.
[25]	Kanno T, Sukegawa S, Fujioka M, et al. Transoral open reduction with rigid internal fixation for subcondylar fractures of the mandible using a small angulated screwdriver system: is endoscopic assistance necessary[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(11): e372-e384.
[26]	Hakim SG, Trankle T, Kimmerle H, et al. A new non-endoscopic intraoral approach for open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fractures of the mandible[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014, 42(7): 1166-1170.
[27]	Alagarsamy R, Lal B, Arangaraju R, et al. Endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach for mandibular condyle fracture management: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2023, 136(5): 537-553.
[28]	Anehosur V, Joshi A, Rajendiran S. Endoscopic-assisted intraoral open reduction internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures: initial experiences from a tertiary-care maxillofacial center in India[J]. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 2018, 11(3): 183-191.
[29]	Huang CH, Lee CC, Wu YC, et al. Novel endoscopic-assisted long plate approach for mandibular condylar fracture reconstruction—A preliminary study[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2025, 41(8): e70033.
[30]	Kang SH, Choi EJ, Kim HW, et al. Complications in endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012, 113(2): 201-206.
[31]	Arcuri F, Brucoli M, Baragiotta N, et al. Analysis of complications following endoscopically assisted treatment of mandibular condylar fractures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2012, 23(3): e196-e198.
[32]	Bera RN, Anand Kumar J, Kanojia S, et al. How far we have come with the management of condylar fractures? A meta-analysis of closed versus open versus endosco-pic management[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2022, 21(3): 888-903.
[33]	Domanski MC, Goodman J, Frake P, et al. Pitfalls in endoscopic treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(6): 2260-2263.
[34]	Sakkas A, Schulze C, Scheurer M, et al. Intraoperative repositioning accuracy in transoral endoscopically-assis-ted mandibular subcondylar fracture repair: a 3-dimensional analysis[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2025, 126(5S): 102441.
[35]	Gangola A, Rana AS, Sharma P, et al. Post auricular approach: an aesthetic advantage[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 36(11): 1085.
[36]	Benech A, Arcuri F, Baragiotta N, et al. Retroauricular transmeatal approach to manage mandibular condylar head fractures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(2): 641-647.
[37]	Kolk A, Neff A. Long-term results of ORIF of condylar head fractures of the mandible: a prospective 5-year follow-up study of small-fragment positional-screw osteosynthesis (SFPSO)[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2015, 43(4): 452-461.
[38]	Arcuri F, Brucoli M, Benech A. Analysis of the retroauricular transmeatal approach: a novel transfacial access to the mandibular skeleton[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 50(2): e22-e26.
[39]	Emam HA, Jatana CA, Ness GM. Matching surgical approach to condylar fracture type[J]. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 25(1): 55-61.