West China Journal of Stomatology

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of differ ent ster ilization methods on the cor rosion of dental fissur e bur

LI Rui- min1, WANG Chenglin1, XU Gui- xiang1, YE Ling2, TAN Hong2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2007-12-25 Revised:2007-12-25 Online:2007-12-20 Published:2007-12-20
  • Contact: YE Ling,Tel:028- 85501439

Abstract:

Objective The purpose was to analyze the effects of three sterilization methods( dry heat sterilization, steam sterilization, chemical sterilization) on the corrosion of dental fissure burs. Methods 100 dental fissure burs were distributed to 10 groups. One was control, the burs in the other 9 groups were treated by dry heat sterilization, steam sterilization, chemical sterilization with 5, 10, 15 cycles respectively. Weight method, scanning electron microscope, micro- hardness measurement were used to analyze the corrosion of dental fissure burs. Results The fissure burs gained their weight with cycles of sterilization. 5, 10, 15 cycles of dry heat sterilization, 10, 15 cycles of steam sterilization and 15 cycles of chemical sterilization, the weight of fissure burs were significantly increased ( P<0.05). Scanning electron microscope showed differences on the surfaces of dental fissure burs among the three sterilization groups. After sterilization, spot or partial erosion were seen on the surface of the burs. The steam sterilization groups showed the most evident changes, followed by chemical sterilization groups and dry heat sterilization groups. X- ray energy spectrometer showed the steam sterilization groups had the largest percentage of W, followed by dry heat sterilization groups, chemical sterilization groups and control group. Fe had the opposite trends. Micro- hardness reduced after sterilization. The reduction was most clear in steam sterilization group, followed by chemical sterilization and dry heat sterilizati(on P<0.05). The difference between 5 and 10 times of steam sterilization and 5, 10, 15 times of chemical sterilization were significant differenc(e P<0.05). There was no significant difference between 5, 10, 15 times of dry heat sterilization ( P >0.05). Conclusion The corrosion is most severe in steamsterilization group, followed by chemical sterilization, dry heat steriliza -tion. Dry heat sterilization shows less corrosion.

Key words: sterilization, corrosion, dental fissure bur