Abstract:

The current low quality of fixed restoration margins is highly correlated with the high incidence of margin-related complications. It is also related to the unclear spatiotemporal geometric position relationship among the consensus definitions of the gingival margin (G), preparation margin (P), and restoration margin (R). This paper discusses the existing problem of the existing term “gingival margin” as a surface anatomical landmark; proposes the term “free gingival margin line” that conforms to geometry and measurement and has importance as a surface anatomical landmark; and clarifies the participants that exist in the marginal area. These participants include the P, R, and G; cementation (adhesive) layer; and gingival sulcus. Moreover, this paper discusses the various iatrogenic damages induced by entering the gingival sulcus via the P, R, and cementing (adhesive) layer. Through the discussion of the design deficiencies of the subgingival and biologically oriented preparation technique, the physiological and clinical importance of the concept of gingival sulcus/gingival sulcus fluid + supercrestal tissue attachment (biological width) = first periodontal protective barrier was analyzed. The value of preserving the physiological role of the gingival sulcus is emphasized. Furthermore, the newly defined RPG distance represents the distance between the successive P or R line and free G line and can be measured in the clinical procedure of tooth preparation. The optimal solution is 0-200 µm, that is, RPG200: the P and R are located on the free G line and the distance between these margins is less than 200 µm. This distance not only has the aesthetic effect of invisibility to the naked eye, it also has a minimal effect on the G and gingival sulcus and is convenient for doctors and patients to clean. Furthermore, in accordance with the positional relationship between the three margins and cementation (adhesive) layer, a new classification of marginal positions is proposed. This classification overcomes the problems of incomplete inclusion objects and uncontrolled risk factors in the previous classification. It also has the advantages of strong practicability, good efficiency of main control geometric quantity, and clear risk control points. The new design scheme and classification of the margi-nal position of RPG200 proposed in this paper provide a new understanding for margin design and complication prevention in the future.

Key words: gingival margin (line), preparation margin, restoration margin, target restorative space, physiophysiologic function of gingival sulcus, micro-prosthodontics and fabrication, biological width, biologically orien-ted preparation technique