West China Journal of Stomatology ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 346-353.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024407

• Basic Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of the function and activity of masticatory muscles using a self-developed wireless surface electromyography system

Li Wenbo1(), Zhu Yujia2, Qin Qingzhao2, Shan Shenyao1, Gao Zixiang2, Wen Aonan2, Wang Yong2(), Zhao Yijiao1()   

  1. 1.Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
    2.Center of Digital Dentistry/Dept. of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & NHC Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2024-11-07 Revised:2025-04-29 Online:2025-06-01 Published:2025-06-10
  • Contact: Wang Yong,Zhao Yijiao E-mail:liwenb@pku.edu.cn;kqcadc@bjmu.edu.cn;kqcadcs@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Natural Science Foundation-Haidian Original Innovation Joint Fund(L232100);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82271039);Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology(2022YFC2405401)

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of a self-developed domestic wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) system (Oralmetry) in assessing the activity of the temporalis and masseter muscles to provide theoretical support for its clinical application. Methods Twenty-two volunteers were recruited. Through multiple repeated measurements, the sEMG signals of bilateral anterior temporalis and masseter muscles during maximum voluntary clenching were collected using the self-developed sEMG device, Oralmetry, and two commercial sEMG devices (Zebris and Teethan), filtered, screened, and standardized. Seven sEMG indicators for assessing masticatory muscle function were calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements from the three sEMG devices, and statistical analysis was conducted to compare the consistency of the seven sEMG indicators obtained from the devices. Results Among the 22 participants, the ICC values of the repeated measurements from the three sEMG devices ranged from 0.88 to 0.99. The measurements of three sEMG indicators (antero-posterior coeffificient, percentage overlapping coeffificient_MM, and percentage overlapping coeffificient_TA) obtained by Zebris were significantly different from those obtained by Oralmetry and Teethan (P<0.05). No significant differences in the measurements of the seven sEMG indicators were found between Oralmetry and Teethan. Conclusion Oralmetry and the two commercial sEMG devices demonstrated good repeatability in capturing sEMG indicators for evaluating masticatory muscle function. In particular, Oralmetry showed the highest ICC values. All three devices also exhibited good consistency in measuring sEMG indicators, and a high agreement was observed between the two wireless sEMG devices (Oralmetry and Teethan). These findings provide theoretical support for the clinical application of Oralmetry.

Key words: surface electromyography device, electromyographic signals, masticatory muscle, temporalis muscle, masseter muscle

CLC Number: