West China Journal of Stomatology ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 568-572.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023038

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The removal of three kinds of occlusal veneers by Er: Yag laser

Zhu Jianyu1(), Hong Feifei1, He Lianghang2, Wen Wei2, Lei Xianlin2, Zhang Zhisheng1, Yin Lu1,3()   

  1. 1.Stomatological Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Stomatological Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, Xiamen 361000, China
    2.Dept. of Oral Medicine, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China
    3.Engineering Research Center of Fujian University for Stomatological Biomaterials, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China
  • Received:2023-02-07 Revised:2023-06-19 Online:2023-10-01 Published:2023-10-08
  • Contact: Yin Lu E-mail:j790408@hotmail.com;516021929@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Xiamen Science and Technology Project(3502Z20224035);Fujian Province Medical Innovation Project(2022CXB022)

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to remove occlusal veneers of varied thicknesses and compositions by Er:Yag laser in vitro and analyze the interfacial microstructure between veneers and tooth that irradiated by laser, by which experimental evidence could be provided to support the non-invasive removal of occlusal veneerby laser. Methods Fresh mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic requirements were collected for tooth preparation. Three kinds of ceramic materials (Vita Suprinity, Vita Mark Ⅱ, and Upcera Hyramic) were selected to fabricate occlusal veneer with different thicknesses (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm). One week later, Er:Yag laser (2.5 W and 3.5 W) was used to irradiate and remove the occlusal veneer and recorded the timespan. After the removal operation, the micro-morphologies of samples were examined by scanning electron microscope. Results Upcera Hyramic veneer failed to be removed (>20 min); the operation span at 2.5 W, Vita Suprinity (96.0 s±16.0 s) was longer than Vita MarkⅡ(84.5 s±19.5 s) in the 1.0 mm group (P<0.05), and Vita Suprinity (246.5 s±13.5 s) was longer than Vita MarkⅡ(170.0 s±14.0 s) in the 1.5 mm group (P<0.05). At 3.5 W, Vita Suprinity (381.0 s±24.0 s) was longer than Vita MarkⅡ(341.5 s±26.5 s) in the 2.0 mm group. Conclusion Increasing laser power could shorten the operation span and facilitate the removal of occlusal veneers with the same thickness and composition. The occlusal veneer was sustained when insufficient laser power was applied. With the same laser power and ceramic thickness, laser penetration could interfere with the integral of the ceramic structure when the laser interacted with the bonding layer. With the same ceramic composition and laser power, the operation span and laser power increased with the thickness of the occlusal veneer. However, the laser was incapable of removing occlusal resin veneer directly.

Key words: Er: Yag laser, occlusal veneer, debonding, resin-based ceramics, glass ceramics, scanning electron microscope

CLC Number: