West China Journal of Stomatology ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 398-403.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.04.008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Relationships among the periodontal biotype characteristics in the maxillary anterior

Yuan Jie1(), Guo Qianqian2, Li Qi3, Sui Yanjun4, Jiang Baoqi5()   

  1. 1. Scottsdale Center for Dentistry, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China
    2. Dept. of Stomatology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China
    3. Jidong Stomatological Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
    4. West Branch, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, China
    5. Dept. of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2019-10-02 Revised:2020-03-11 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-08-03
  • Contact: Jiang Baoqi E-mail:jiangbaoqione@163.com

Abstract:

Objective To explore the correlation among gingival thickness (GT), underlying alveolar bone thickness (BT), and other periodontal biotype characteristics in the maxillary anterior. Methods A total of 40 young volunteers with healthy periodontal were involved in this research. The periodontal probe was previously used to divide the gingiva from thick to thin. Two records were measured by cone beam CT (CBCT) GT, which was measured at the cement-enamel junction level; and BT, which was measured at 3 locations: 1, 3, 5 mm below the alveolar crest. Oral and gypsum measurements were used to analyze the associations of the crown width/crown length ratio (CW/CL), the keratinized mucosa width (KM), and the free gingival margin curvature. Results Significant difference in the GT was observed between the thick and thin biotypes, which were divided by periodontal probe (P<0.01). Difference was observed in each periodontal biotype characteristic between the thick (GT≥1 mm) and thin biotypes (GT<1 mm) (P<0.05). BT was positively associated with GT (r=0.293, P=0.001), CW/CL (r=0.273, P=0.003), KM (r=0.291, P=0.001), and free gingival margin curvature (r=0.290, P=0.001). Conclusion The transparency of the probing in the sulcus could analyze the GT qualitatively. The thick and thin biotypes have different periodontal biotype characteristics. Compared with individuals with thick biotype, those with thin biotype are susceptible to risk dental aesthetic.

Key words: periodontal biotype, gingival thickness, bone thickness, oral implantology

CLC Number: