Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement and influencing factors

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2017.01.015

Abstract

Abstract:

Digital technology is a new trend in implant dentistry and oral medical technology. Stereolithographic surgical guides, which are computer-guided implant placement, have been introduced gradually to the market. Surgeons are attracted to this approach because of it features visualized preoperative planning, simple surgical procedure, flapless implant, and imme-diate restoration. However, surgeons are concerned about the accuracy and complications of this approach. This review aims to introduce the classification of computer-guided implant placement. The advantages, disadvantages, and accuracy of this approach are also analyzed. Moreover, factors that may affect the outcomes of computer-guided implant placement are deter-mined. Results will provide a reference to surgeons regarding the clinical application of this approach.

Key words: dental implant, accuracy, computer-assisted design implant dentistry, guided surgery, effect factors

CLC Number:

R783

Jinmeng Li, Guomin. Ou. Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement and influencing factors[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 35(1): 93-98.

References 44

[1]	Torabinejad M, Anderson P, Bader J, et al.Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replace-ment: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007, 98(4):285-311.
[2]	Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, et al.A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dent-ures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004, 15(6):667-676.
[3]	Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, et al.A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(2):119-130.
[4]	Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al.Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scan-ners for dentomaxillofacial applications[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 71(3):461-468.
[5]	Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al.Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(2):267-271.
[6]	Jacobs R.Preoperative radiologic planning of implant sur-gery in compromised patients[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2003, 33:12-25.
[7]	Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, et al.Effect of flapless sur-gery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006, 21(2):298-304.
[8]	Jeong SM, Choi BH, Kim J, et al.A 1-year prospective clini-cal study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011, 111(1):41-46.
[9]	Becker W, Wikesjö UM, Sennerby L, et al.Histologic eva-luation of implants following flapless and flapped surgery: a study in canines[J]. J Periodontol, 2006, 77(10):1717-1722.
[10]	Barter S.Computer-aided implant placement in the recons-truction of a severely resorbed maxilla-a 5-year clinical study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(6):627-637.
[11]	Nkenke E, Eitner S, Radespiel-Tröger M, et al.Patient-centred outcomes comparing transmucosal implant place-ment with an open approach in the maxilla: a prospective, non-randomized pilot study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(2):197-203.
[12]	van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and imme-diate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2005, 7(Suppl 1):S111-S120.
[13]	Sanna AM, Molly L, van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CAD-CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: a cohort study of consecutive patients[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007, 97(6):331-339.
[14]	Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M.Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 6):124-135.
[15]	Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant place-ment with restoration-generated site development[J]. Com-pend Contin Educ Dent, 1995, 16(8):796, 798-802, 804.
[16]	D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithogra-phic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012, 14(3):321-335.
[17]	Van de Velde T, Glor F, De Bruyn H. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(1):66-72.
[18]	Fürhauser R, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, et al.Esthetics of flapless single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla using guided surgery: association of three-dimensional accuracy and pink esthetic score[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(Suppl 2):e427-e433.
[19]	Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, et al.Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(3):308-313.
[20]	Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, et al.Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 6):112-123.
[21]	Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, et al. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results[J]. J Periodontol, 2005, 76(4):503-507.
[22]	Beretta M, Poli PP, Maiorana C.Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: a prospec-tive clinical study[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2014, 44(4):184-193.
[23]	Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, et al.Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived ste-reolithographic surgical guides in implant placement[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(2):394-401.
[24]	Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A.Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(2):234-242.
[25]	Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N.Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003, 18(4):571-577.
[26]	Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, et al.Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method—a combined in vivo-in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part Ⅱ)[J]. J Cranio-maxillofac Surg, 2010, 38(7):488-493.
[27]	Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al.Computer techno-logy applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl):92-109.
[28]	Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, et al.Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre ran-domised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2014, 7(3):229-242.
[29]	Schneider J, Decker R, Kalender WA.Accuracy in medi-cinal modelling[J]. Phidias Nes letters, 2002, 8:5-14.
[30]	Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, et al.Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant plan-ning[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(11):1191-1199.
[31]	Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, et al.Reliability of im-plant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants[J]. J Periodontol, 2008, 79(8):1339-1345.
[32]	Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I.Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 108(3):181-188.
[33]	Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.Accuracy of two ste-reolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical compa-rative study[J]. J Periodontol, 2010, 81(1):43-51.
[34]	Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, et al.Computed tomo-graphy-based evaluation of template (Nobel Guide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(10):1157-1163.
[35]	Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, et al.Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: PartⅠ[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2010, 103(6):334-342.
[36]	Di Giacomo GA, da Silva JV, da Silva AM, et al. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sin-tering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation[J]. J Perio-dontol, 2012, 83(4):410-419.
[37]	Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, et al.Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(3):448-459.
[38]	Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, et al.Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator expe-rience[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(3):407-413.
[39]	Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I.Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithogra-phic surgical templates: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(4):248-254.
[40]	Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Bergé SJ, et al.An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the aug-mented maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(6):1154-1163.
[41]	Van Assche N, Quirynen M.Tolerance within a surgical guide[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 21(4):455-458.
[42]	Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, et al.Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(6):630-634.
[43]	Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE.Accuracy of a compute-rized tomography-guided template-assisted implant place-ment system: an in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(10):1156-1162.
[44]	D’haese J, De Bruyn H.Effect of smoking habits on accu-racy of implant placement using mucosally supported ste-reolithographic surgical guides[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(3):402-411.