West China Journal of Stomatology ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 582-588.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2022.05.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Morphometric evaluation of sella turcica and cranial base in patients with congenital absence of teeth

Li Yaqi(), Wang Ziqian, Liu Jiaqi, Yan Zhebin, Xiao Chuqiao, Wang Jun, Xiong Xin.()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Si-chuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2022-02-15 Revised:2022-07-13 Online:2022-10-01 Published:2022-10-17
  • Contact: Xiong Xin. E-mail:liyaqi@stu.scu.edu.cn;drxiongxin@scu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Province College Students’ Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Plan Program(S202210610543);Correspondence: Xiong Xin, E-mail: drxiongxin@scu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the size and shape of sella turcica and cranial base in patients with different degrees of congenital absence of teeth. Methods The subjects comprised 322 patients from the Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University from 2020 to 2021. Based on the number of congenital absence of teeth, the patients were divided into three groups: control group (without loss of teeth, n=112), group Ⅰ (loss of 1-2 teeth, n=104), and group Ⅱ (loss of 3 or more teeth, n=106). Uceph cephalometric software was used to measure the linear and angular parameters of cranial base. The length, depth, and diameter of sella turcica were also calculated. The shape of sella turcica was described as normal or with aberrations. Analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were conducted with SPSS 21.0. Results No statistical differences were observed in the length, depth, and diameter of sella turcica and parameters related to the cranial base among the three groups (P>0.05). The incidence of sella turcica bridge among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.013). The incidence was higher in the study group compared with the control group (P<0.05), and no significant difference was observed between groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P>0.05). Conclusion Although the linear size of sella turcica and parameters related to the cranial base was not statistically different between normal subjects and patients with congenital absence of teeth, the incidence of sella turcica bridge was higher in patients with congenital absence of teeth, suggesting the possibly abnormal anatomical morphology of sella turcica in this population.

Key words: congenital absence of teeth, sella turcica, cranial base, lateral cephalogram

CLC Number: