West China Journal of Stomatology ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 532-536.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.05.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effects of scaling and root planing with an adjunctive periodontal endoscope for residual pockets: a randomized controlled clinical study

Zhang Yangheng(), Li Houxuan, Yan Fuhua, Tan Baochun()   

  1. 5 mm) in patients with periodontitis after initial periodontal therapy and has advantages in improving the long-term curative effect of this therapy.
    Dept. of Periodontology, Nanjing Sto?matological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2019-12-28 Revised:2020-06-29 Online:2020-10-01 Published:2020-10-14
  • Contact: Tan Baochun E-mail:zhangyh207@163.com;tanbaochun2002@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Program(YKK17139);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20190133);Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Team(CXTDB2017-014)

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of scaling and root planing (SRP) with a periodontal endoscope in the treatment of residual pockets in patients with periodontitis after initial periodontal therapy. Methods Patients with residual pockets [probing depth (PD)≥5 mm] were included and randomly assigned to the endoscope group (SRP with a periodontal endoscope) or SRP group (SRP alone). The PD, attachment loss (AL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) of residual pockets were recorded before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0 software. Results Compared with the baseline values, the percentage of PD≥5 mm sites, PD, AL, and BOP (+)% in the endoscope group and SRP group at 3 and 6 months after treatment decreased (P<0.05). Compared with the values at 3 months after treatment, the percentage of PD≥5 mm sites, PD, AL, and BOP (+)% at 3 and 6 months after treatment decreased in the endoscope group (P<0.05), whereas no statistical difference in these values was observed in the SRP group (P>0.05). Compared with those in the SRP group, the percentage of PD≥5 mm sites and PD at 3 and 6 months after treatment and AL and BOP (+)% at 6 months after treatment in the endos?cope group decreased (P<0.05). Conclusion SRP with a periodontal endoscope shows a better effect in improving the PD, AL, and BOP of residual pockets (PD≥5 mm) in patients with periodontitis after initial periodontal therapy and has advan?tages in improving the long-term curative effect of this therapy.

Key words: periodontal endoscope, residual pockets, scaling and root planing, chronic periodontitis

CLC Number: