West China Journal of Stomatology ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 43-50.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.01.006

• Orginal Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of different surface modifications on micro-structure and adhesion of zirconia ceramic: an in vitro study

Siwen Li(), Shishi Li, Yanhong Wang, Hongmei. Ma()   

  1. Dept. of General Dentistry, Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical Uni-versity, Shenyang 110000, China
  • Received:2016-01-20 Revised:2016-10-20 Online:2017-02-01 Published:2017-02-01
  • Supported by:
    National Scientific Fund Youth Fund (81200765);Liaoning Scientific Fund (2015020468).

Abstract:

Objective This study evaluated the effect of different mechanical-chemical surface treatments on the charac-teristics, microstructure, and composition of zirconia ceramics and on the zirconia-dentin adhesion. Methods The sintered commercial zirconia blocks (IPS e.max ZirCAD) were sectioned into 126 beams (6 mm×6 mm×5 mm) and randomly assigned to seven experimental groups (n=18). The zirconia block specimens were further treated as follows: (A) untreated, as control; (B) sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3; (C) sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3+30 μm silica powder; (D) sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3+30% silica-sol coating; (E) sandblasted with 110 μm Al2O3; (F) sandblasted with 110 μm Al2O3+30 μm silica powder; and (G) sandblasted with 110 μm Al2O3+30% silica-sol coating. The surface roughness (Ra) of zirconia ceramics using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) after seven surface treatments was analyzed. Seventy specimens of dentin surfaces were prepared. A dual-cure resin cement was applied into zirconia surfaces with its corresponding adhesive components to dentin. Shear bond strength (SBS) of each sample was measured using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS 17.0 software. Results Ra of zirconia were significantly different compared with the control group (P<0.05). The crystalline transformation from tetragonal phase to monoclinic phase was observed after surface modification. Monoclinic volume content of the heat-treated group was highest than that in other groups. The content of element Si in the heat-treated group was higher than that in other treatment groups accompanied by a decrease in elements Zr, Y, and Hf after being treated by two silica-coating methods. Air abrasion signifi-cantly increased the micro-cracks in the ceramic surface and caused the grain boundaries to disappear. A serious shrinkage of the thin silica film can be observed after sintering procedure. This process induced cracks and the film to strip away slightly from the surfaces of Y-TZP substrate. The SBS values from large to small were F and G groups, C and D groups, B and E groups (P<0.05), and control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Alumina sandblasting, silica powder abrasion, and silica-sol coating affect the surface morphology, structure, and composition of the tooth. This effect can also achieve the improved micro-mechanical interlocking or chemical bonding and finally increase the bond strength between zirconia and tooth. Alumina sandblasting followed by silica coating is an effective technique to increase the bonding strength between the zirconia ceramic and dentin.

Key words: zirconia, sandblasting, silica coating, surface roughness, phase transformation

CLC Number: