不同表面处理对牙颈部非龋性硬化性病损粘接性能的影响

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2020.04.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

牙颈部非龋性硬化性病损（NCSL）是含有非龋性硬化性牙本质（NCSD）的牙颈部病损,大多数呈楔状或碟形,表面光亮,质硬,呈淡黄色或深棕色,好发于尖牙以及前磨牙,临床上可伴牙本质敏感,并影响美观。目前,治疗NCSL的主要方法是复合树脂直接粘接修复,但存在充填体脱落率高等临床问题。NCSL的粘接界面有NCSD和釉质2个部分,研究表明粘接修复前对这该界面进行特殊处理可以提高NCSL的粘接性能。本文对NCSL直接粘接修复术的表面处理方法及其对粘接性能的影响作一综述,为临床治疗提供参考。

关键词: 牙颈部非龋性硬化性病损, 非龋性硬化性牙本质, 表面处理方法, 粘接性能

Abstract:

Noncarious cervical sclerotic lesions (NCSL) are dental cervical lesions with noncarious sclerotic dentine (NCSD), which appears smooth, hard, and either light yellow or dark brown. Most NCSLs are wedge or dish shaped and commonly occur in canines and premolars, leading to dental hypersensitivity and aesthetic defect. The principal treatment is composite resin restoration; however, many clinical problems, such as retention loss, should not be ignored. NCSL’s bonding interface includes NCSD and enamel, and interface pre-treatment can promote the bonding effect. This review summarizes current surface treatment methods and their influence on the bonding effectiveness of NCSL to provide guidance for clinical practice.

Key words: noncarious cervical sclerotic lesions, noncarious cervical sclerotic dentine, surface treatments, bonding efficacy

中图分类号:

R781.05

余丹华, 贾玲玲, 李继遥. 不同表面处理对牙颈部非龋性硬化性病损粘接性能的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(4): 438-442.

Yu Danhua, Jia Lingling, Li Jiyao. Effects of various surface treatments on the bonding efficacy of noncarious cervical sclerotic lesions[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 38(4): 438-442.

参考文献 42

[1]	Walter C, Kress E, Götz H, et al. The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2014,18(1):139-146. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0960-0 URL
[2]	Igarashi Y, Yoshida S, Kanazawa E. The prevalence and morphological types of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) in a contemporary sample of people[J]. Odontology, 2017,105(4):443-452. URL pmid: 28275876
[3]	Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, et al. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial[J]. J Dent, 2018,69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011 URL pmid: 28962842
[4]	Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review[J]. J Dent, 2004,32(3):173-196. URL pmid: 15001284
[5]	Rocha AC, da Rosa W, Cocco AR, et al. Influence of surface treatment on composite adhesion in noncarious cervical lesions: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Oper Dent, 2018,43(5):508-519.
[6]	Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Mena-Serrano A, et al. Effect of EDTA conditioning on cervical restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive: a randomized double-blind clinical trial[J]. J Dent, 2015,43(9):1175-1183. URL pmid: 25963586
[7]	Martini EC, Parreiras SO, Gutierrez MF, et al. Effect of different protocols in preconditioning with EDTA in sclerotic dentin and enamel before universal adhesives applied in self-etch mode[J]. Oper Dent, 2017,42(3):284-296.
[8]	Can Say E, Özel E, Yurdagüven H, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2014,18(5):1427-1433. URL pmid: 24264636
[9]	Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear[J]. Monogr Oral Sci, 2014,25:32-45. URL pmid: 24993256
[10]	Kwong SM, Tay FR, Yip HK, et al. An ultrastructural study of the application of dentine adhesives to acid-conditioned sclerotic dentine[J]. J Dent, 2000,28(7):515-528. URL pmid: 10960756
[11]	王雪, 仇丽鸿, 李子木, 等. 不同表面处理方法对非龋性硬化牙本质黏结强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013,22(6):662-666.
	Wang X, Qiu LH, Li ZM , et al. Effect of different surface managements on micro-tensile bond strength of non-carious sclerotic dentin to resin[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2013,22(6):662-666.
[12]	Gisler G, Gutknecht N. The influence of the energy density and other clinical parameters on bond strength of Er:YAG-conditioned dentin compared to conventional dentin adhesion[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2014,29(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1243-8 URL pmid: 23224751
[13]	Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, et al. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique[J]. Dent Mater, 2002,18(5):359-369. URL pmid: 12175574
[14]	Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on the clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2015,17(5):391-403.
[15]	Luque-Martinez IV, Mena-Serrano A, Muñoz MA, et al. Effect of bur roughness on bond to sclerotic dentin with self-etch adhesive systems[J]. Oper Dent, 2013,38(1):39-47. doi: 10.2341/11-390-L URL pmid: 22770432
[16]	Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, et al. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite[J]. J Dent Res, 2006,85(10):941-944. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501014 URL pmid: 16998137
[17]	Oliveira B, Ulbaldini A, Sato F, et al. Chemical interaction analysis of an adhesive containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) with the dentin in noncarious cervical lesions[J]. Oper Dent, 2017,42(4):357-366. doi: 10.2341/16-062-L URL pmid: 28157419
[18]	刘芳, 赵信义, 何惠明. 预酸蚀对非龋性硬化牙本质黏结强度的影响[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2007,17(5):272-275.
	Liu F, Zhao XY, He HM . Effect of additional acid-etching on the bond strengths of self-etching adhesives to noncarious sclerotic dentine[J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2007,17(5):272-275.
[19]	Loguercio AD, Bittencourt DD, Baratieri LN, et al. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2007,138(4):507-514. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0204 URL pmid: 17403742
[20]	Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, et al. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis[J]. Oper Dent, 2008,33(4):370-378. doi: 10.2341/07-128 URL pmid: 18666493
[21]	Perdigão J. Dentin bonding: variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment[J]. Dent Mater, 2010,26(2):e24-e37. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149 URL pmid: 20005565
[22]	Häfer M, Jentsch H, Haak R, et al. A three-year clinical evaluation of a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions[J]. J Dent, 2015,43(3):350-361. URL pmid: 25541248
[23]	Breschi L, Maravic T, Cunha SR, et al. Dentin bonding systems: from dentin collagen structure to bond preservation and clinical applications[J]. Dent Mater, 2018,34(1):78-96. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.11.005 URL pmid: 29179971
[24]	Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Araújo E, et al. Effect of dentin age and acid etching time on dentin bonding[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2011,13(2):139-145. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19028 URL pmid: 21594227
[25]	Mena-Serrano AP, Garcia EJ, Perez MM, et al. Effect of the application time of phosphoric acid and self-etch adhesive systems to sclerotic dentin[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2013,21(2):196-202. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302136 URL pmid: 23739856
[26]	Farias DC, Lopes GC, Baratieri LN. Two-year clinical performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: influence of subject’s age and dentin etching time[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015,19(8):1867-1874. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1399-2 URL pmid: 25609033
[27]	Lattaa MA. Shear bond strength and physicochemical interactions of XP Bond[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2007,9(Suppl 2):245-248.
[28]	Osorio R, Erhardt MCG, Pimenta LAF, et al. EDTA treatment improves resin-dentin bonds’ resistance to degradation[J]. J Dent Res, 2005,84(8):736-740. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400810 URL pmid: 16040732
[29]	李婷婷, 孙敏敏, 康钧棠, 等. EDTA预处理法对树脂黏结强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015,24(5):594-597.
	Li TT, Sun MM, Kang JT , et al. Clinical research of EDTA pretreatment on the bonding strength of resin[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2015,24(5):594-597.
[30]	Sauro S, Mannocci F, Toledano M, et al. EDTA or H₃PO₄/NaOCl dentine treatments may increase hybrid layers’ resistance to degradation: a microtensile bond strength and confocal-micropermeability study[J]. J Dent, 2009,37(4):279-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.12.002 URL pmid: 19155116
[31]	班晶浩. 不同功率Er,Cr:YSGG激光预处理对非龋性硬化牙本质自酸蚀粘接性能的影响[D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2015.
	Ban JH . The effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different output powers on the self-etching bonding properties of non-carious sclerotic dentin[D]. Xi’an: The Fourth Military Medical University, 2015.
[32]	李子木, 仇丽鸿, 孙海燕. 脉冲Nd:YAG激光对非龋性硬化牙本质自酸蚀黏结强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2009,18(4):346-349.
	Li ZM, Qiu LH, Sun HY . Effect of pulse Nd:YAG laser on micro-tensile bond strength of non-carious sclerotic dentin to resin[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2009,18(4):346-349.
[33]	Hadley J, Young DA, Eversole LR, et al. A laser-powered hydrokinetic system for caries removal and cavity preparation[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2000,131(6):777-785. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0277 URL pmid: 10860330
[34]	刘艳, 付强, 葛志华, 等. Er,Cr:YSGG激光对老年人非龋性硬化牙本质粘结强度的影响[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2014(9):530-533.
	Liu Y, Fu Q, Ge ZH , et al. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the bonding strength of the elderly non-carious sclerotic dentin[J]. Chin J Conserv Dent, 2014(9):530-533.
[35]	Sun X, Ban J, Sha X, et al. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different output powers on the micromorphology and the bond property of non-carious sclerotic dentin to resin composites[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(11):e0142311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142311 URL pmid: 26544034
[36]	刘艳, 付强. Er,Cr:YSGG激光对非龋性硬化牙本质超微形态的作用及对其粘接性能的影响[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2017,26(4):177-180, 233.
	Liu Y, Fu Q . Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on ultrastructure and adhesive properties of non-carious sclerotic dentin[J]. Chin J Laser Med Surg, 2017,26(4):177-180, 233.
[37]	Swanson TK, Feigal RJ, Tantbirojn D, et al. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth[J]. Pediatr Dent, 2008,30(2):134-140. URL pmid: 18481578
[38]	Schroeder M, Reis A, Luque-Martinez I, et al. Effect of enamel bevel on retention of cervical composite resin restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2015,43(7):777-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.017 URL pmid: 25765866
[39]	Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, et al. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface[J]. Dent Mater, 2008,24(1):90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009 URL
[40]	Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results[J]. Oper Dent, 2012,37(1):3-11. doi: 10.2341/11-222-C URL
[41]	Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, et al. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2008,10(5):339-344. URL pmid: 19058678
[42]	Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A, et al. Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2016,53:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.009 URL pmid: 27381814