通用型粘接剂和树脂水门汀对氧化锆剪切粘接强度的影响

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2019.05.004

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 476-479.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.05.004

通用型粘接剂和树脂水门汀对氧化锆剪切粘接强度的影响

刘皓琰¹,郑志强²,彭诚³,林捷²()

1.天津医科大学口腔医学院,天津 300070
2.福建医科大学附属口腔医院特诊科,福州 350002
3.天津医科大学第二医院口腔科,天津 300201

收稿日期:2019-01-21 修回日期:2019-04-19 出版日期:2019-10-01 发布日期:2019-10-15
通讯作者: 林捷 E-mail:dds@gmail.com
作者简介:刘皓琰,硕士,E-mail：395711575@qq.com
基金资助:
福建省卫生计生中青年骨干人才培养项目(2016-ZQN-60)

Effects of universal adhesives and resin cement on the shear bond strength of zirconia

Liu Haoyan¹,Zheng Zhiqiang²,Peng Cheng³,Lin Jie²()

1.School of Stomatology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
2.Dept. of VIP Dental Service, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China
3.Dept. of Stomatology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300201, China

Received:2019-01-21 Revised:2019-04-19 Online:2019-10-01 Published:2019-10-15
Contact: Jie Lin E-mail:dds@gmail.com
Supported by:
Young and Middle-aged Key Talents Training Project of Fujian Province Health and Family Planning Commission(2016-ZQN-60)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的研究通用型粘接剂和树脂水门汀对氧化锆陶瓷剪切粘接强度和耐久性的影响。方法氧化锆陶瓷烧结制作20 mm×10 mm×10 mm和10 mm×10 mm×10mm两种尺寸的试件,实验分为12组,将这2种试件分别采用不同的树脂水门汀（RelyX Ultimate树脂水门汀、Clearfil SAC自粘接树脂水门汀）和通用粘接剂（无粘接剂、Scotchbond通用粘接剂、Clearfil SE One粘接剂）在不同的储存条件（水浴、水浴+冷热循环）下进行粘接。测试剪切粘接强度,分析断裂形态。结果水门汀（F=8.41,P<0.01）和粘接剂（F=30.34,P<0.01）对氧化锆剪切粘接强度的影响有统计学意义;储存条件对剪切粘接强度的影响无统计学意义（F=1.83,P=0.18）。RelyX Ultimate树脂水门汀、无粘接剂、水浴+冷热循环储存时的剪切粘接强度最低（14.02 MPa±6.86 MPa）,RelyX Ultimate树脂水门汀、Scotchbond通用粘接剂、水浴+冷热循环储存时的剪切粘接强度最高（54.12 MPa±8.37 MPa）。结论通用型粘接剂可提高树脂水门汀对氧化锆的粘接耐久性。非自粘接的树脂水门汀如不使用通用型粘接剂则其粘接耐久性下降。

关键词: 通用型粘接剂, 自粘接树脂水门汀, 剪切粘接强度, 氧化锆陶瓷

Abstract:

Objective To study the effects of universal adhesives and resin cement on the shear bond strength and durability of zirconia ceramics. Methods Zirconia ceramics were sintered into 20 mm×10 mm×10 mm and 10 mm×10 mm×10 mm specimens. The experiment was divided into 12 groups. The two types of specimens were bonded using two variants of resin cement (RelyX Ultimate and Clearfil SAC self-adhesive resin cement), universal adhesives (non-adhesive, Scotchbond universal adhesive, and Clearfil SE One adhesive), and storage conditions (water bath and water bath-thermal cycling). The shear bond strengths were tested, and the fracture morphologies were analyzed. Results The cement (F=8.41, P<0.01) and adhesive (F=30.34, P<0.01) exerted a significant effect on the shear bond strength of zirconia, whereas storage condition showed no significant effect on this property (F=1.83, P=0.18). The lowest shear bond strength (14.02 MPa±6.86 MPa) was exhibited by the group treated with RelyX Ultimate resin cement, non-adhesive, and water bath-thermal cycling, whereas the highest shear bond strength (54.12 MPa±8.37 MPa) was displayed by the group treated with RelyX Ultimate resin cement, Scotchbond universal adhesive, and water bath-thermal cycling. Conclusion Universal adhesives can improve the durability of the bonding of resin cement to zirconia. If non-self-adhesive resin cement is used without a universal adhesive, the durability of the bond will be greatly reduced.

Key words: universal adhesive, self-adhesive resin cement, shear bond strength, zirconia ceramic

中图分类号:

R783.2

刘皓琰,郑志强,彭诚,林捷. 通用型粘接剂和树脂水门汀对氧化锆剪切粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 476-479.

Liu Haoyan,Zheng Zhiqiang,Peng Cheng,Lin Jie. Effects of universal adhesives and resin cement on the shear bond strength of zirconia[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 37(5): 476-479.

图/表 3

参考文献 15

[1]	Sharafeddin F, Shoale S . Effects of universal and conventional MDP primers on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic and nanofilled composite resin[J]. J Dent (Shiraz), 2018,19(1):48-56.
[2]	Llerena-Icochea AE, Costa RM, Borges A , et al. Bonding polycrystalline zirconia with 10-MDP-containing adhesives[J]. Oper Dent, 2017,42(3):335-341.
[3]	Ozcan M, Kumbuloglu O . Effect of composition, viscosity and thickness of the opaquer on the adhesion of resin composite to titanium[J]. Dent Mater, 2009,25(10):1248-1255.
[4]	Lin J, Shinya A, Gomi H , et al. Effect of self-adhesive resin cement and tribochemical treatment on bond strength to zirconia[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2010,2(1):28-34.
[5]	Lin J, Shinya A, Gomi H , et al. In vitro evaluation of the bonding durability of self-adhesive resin cement to titanium using highly accelerated life test[J]. Dent Mater J, 2011,30(6):837-844.
[6]	Yang B, Wolfart S, Scharnberg M , et al. Influence of contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding[J]. J Dent Res, 2007,86(8):749-753.
[7]	Samran A, Al-Ammari A, El Bahra S , et al. Bond strength durability of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019,121(3):477-484.
[8]	Sato T, Anami L, Melo R , et al. Effects of surface treatments on the bond strength between resin cement and a new zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic[J]. Oper Dent, 2016,41(3):284-292.
[9]	Okutan Y, Yucel MT, Gezer T , et al. Effect of airborne particle abrasion and sintering order on the surface roughness and shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and resin cement[J]. Dent Mater J, 2019,38(2):241-249.
[10]	Alex G . Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2015, 36(1):15-26; quiz 28, 40.
[11]	Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J . Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014,112(2):182-187.
[12]	Ferreira-Filho R, Ely C, Amaral R , et al. Effect of different adhesive systems used for immediate dentin sealing on bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to dentin[J]. Oper Dent, 2018,43(4):391-397.
[13]	Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Ajami AA, Bahari M , et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-adhesive resin cements on the shear bond strength to dentin[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2017,28(6):681-686.
[14]	Yao CM, Yu J, Wang YK , et al. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2018,34(5):809-818.
[15]	Ouchi H, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K , et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition layer of universal adhesives on enamel bond fatigue durability and interfacial characteristics with different etching modes[J]. Oper Dent, 2017,42(6):636-645.

通用型粘接剂和树脂水门汀对氧化锆剪切粘接强度的影响

Effects of universal adhesives and resin cement on the shear bond strength of zirconia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 15

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

水门汀	无粘接剂		Scotchbond通用粘接剂		Clearfil SE One粘接剂
水门汀	水浴	水浴+冷热循环	水浴	水浴+冷热循环	水浴	水浴+冷热循环
RelyX Ultimate树脂水门汀	29.43±8.17^ab	14.02±6.86^a	38.02±9.23^bc	54.12±8.37^d	36.77±6.30^bc	46.14±8.26^cd
Clearfil SAC自粘接树脂水门汀	34.98±8.80^bc	35.99±15.30^bc	42.91±6.54^bcd	48.89±12.66^cd	45.47±2.49^bcd	44.27±14.23^bcd

[1]	孟雨晨, 黄帆, 王思霖, 黄欣, 逯宜, 裴丹丹. 羟磷灰石牙本质脱敏剂对温和型通用型粘接系统粘接性能研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 668-675.
[2]	张海兵, 霍欢, 刘利军. 不同表面处理方法对纳米复合陶瓷与树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(2): 155-159.
[3]	孙源,刘鹤,孙志辉. 处理时间对成熟恒牙和年轻恒牙应用通用型粘接剂时牙本质粘接效果的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(5): 482-487.
[4]	罗新宇, 孟翔峰. 不同核材料与二氧化锆陶瓷树脂粘接耐久性的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 89-92.
[5]	王博陈剑锋张言春王如. 着色剂对口腔修复用钇稳定氧化锆陶瓷粉体制备的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(5): 462-465.
[6]	张红景页聂蓉蓉孟翔峰. 底涂剂的化学处理对二氧化锆陶瓷树脂粘接效果的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(5): 466-469.
[7]	焦纪兰曾利伟周灏邓璐周年苟陈萍江辉. 不同牙本质清洁剂对牙本质与自粘接树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(3): 306-310.
[8]	王丹杨张凌李芳徐帅陈吉华. 参与不同牙本质粘接界面退变过程中基质金属蛋白酶种类的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(4): 394-399.
[9]	胡道勇钟恬朱洪水. 3种树脂表面处理技术对树脂核-玻璃离子水门汀粘接强度影响的实验研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2013, 31(1): 70-73.
[10]	肖喜梅1，2 邢路3 许海平1，2 江喆1，2 苏勤1，2. 4种粘接剂对牙本质粘接强度的体外评价[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 343-345.
[11]	丁虹兰卫东孟翔峰. 自粘接树脂水门汀在模拟根管内的硬度变化[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(3): 243-246.
[12]	李若兰,任煜光,韩捷. 脉冲Nd:YAG激光影响复合树脂修补烤瓷粘接强度实验研究[J]. , 2000, 18(06): 0-.